Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Thelma Elaine Holmes
Thelma Elaine Holmes
Visitors: 28
0
Bar #238090(FL)     License for 47 years; Member in Good Standing
New Port Richey FL

Are you Thelma Elaine Holmes? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

99-002234  BRENDA B. SHERIDAN vs DEEP LAGOON MARINA, A/K/A DEEP LAGOON BOAT CLUB, LTD., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 18, 1999
The issues in this case are whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should modify the conditions of permits held by the Deep Lagoon Boat Club, Ltd., d/b/a Deep Lagoon Marina (Applicant), to allow Applicant to construct and operate a boat travel lift in a new location at the marina and to substitute a 60-foot wide flushing channel required by the prior permits with two-48 inches box culverts.Application to modify marina permit to relocate travel boat lift and substitute culverts for flushing channel. Recommended Order: impacts on water quality and manatees de minimis; grant application with additional conditions.
98-003901  BRENDA B. SHERIDAN vs DEEP LAGOON BOAT CLUB, LTD., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 04, 1998
The issue in DOAH Case No. 98-3901 is whether Respondent Deep Lagoon Boat Club, Ltd., is entitled to a maintenance dredging exemption from environmental resource permitting. The issue in DOAH Case No. 98-5409 is whether Respondent Deep Lagoon Boat Club, Ltd., is entitled to an environmental resource permit for the construction of a surface water management system.Dredging failed to establish width of maxium canal depth as originally designed; dredging did not qualify for maintenance exception. Department failed to consider impacts of environmental resource permit that was formerly surface water management permit.
97-003863RE  RICK MARTINEZ vs DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 22, 1997
Petitioner has challenged a series of emergency rules promulgated by the Respondent to address the discovery of Mediterranean fruit flies (medflies) in parts of central Florida. Specifically, Petitioner contends that 5BER 97-3, 5BER 97-4, 5BER 97-6, and 5BER 97-7 are invalid to the extent that they make any geographical area subject to emergency rule for more than 90 days. The issue for determination, therefore, is whether the emergency rules are invalid as claimed.Serial adopt. of emergency rules violates 90-day limit.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer