welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Thomas J Cassidy, III
Thomas J Cassidy, III
Thomas J Cassidy, III
Visitors: 120
0
Bar #333123(FL)     License for 43 years; Member in Good Standing
Panama City FL

Are you Thomas J Cassidy, III? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

87-210  US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. MIAMI SHEET METAL  (1987)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 24, 1987 Citations: 516 So. 2d 29
516 So. 2d 29 (1987) UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO., and Mascrete, Inc., Appellant, v. MIAMI SHEET METAL PRODUCTS, INC., and Artic Air Condition Corporation, Appellees. No. 87-210. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 24, 1987. Rehearing Denied December 23, 1987. *30 Gilmour, Morgan & Rosenblatt and Robert A. Rosenblatt, Miami, for appellant. Ferdie & Gouz and Michael Heidt, Coral Gables, Evan J. Langbein, Miami, for appellees. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL..
96-003667BID  ALL SEASONS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS, INC. (E-7578) vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 1996
Whether All Seasons Landscape Contractors, Inc., should be awarded Department of Transportation Contract Number 7584 as the lowest and best bid.Petitioner was third place bid; no standing.
96-003668BID  ALL SEASONS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS, INC. (E-7578) vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 06, 1996
Whether All Seasons Landscape Contractors, Inc., should be awarded Florida Department of Transportation Contract Number 7578 as the lowest and best bid.Petitioner failed to provide required equipment list - material information and can't be waived.
93-004271BID  PAB CONSULTANTS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 03, 1993
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intent to award a contract for bridge-tending services (RFP DOT 92/93 2088 REBID) to Intervenor constitutes fraudulent, arbitrary, capricious, illegal or dishonest action.Absent proof that award of bid for bridge-tending services is arbitrary, fraudulent, capricious, illegal or dishonest award should be made to Intervenor.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer