Leon FL Lawyers | Todd Evan Studley -- eLawyers

Todd Evan Studley

Visitors: 37

Bar #10238(FL) License for 20 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Todd Evan Studley? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

CFR: 29 CFR 1630.2, 29 CFR 1630.2, 29 CFR 1630.2

Florida Laws: 110.227, 112.532, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 20.315, 509.092, 538.20, 760.01, 760.02, 760.10, 760.11, 760.35

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.214, 60L-33.002

15-001803F RANDALL B. JOHNSON vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 02, 2015

Whether pursuant to section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2015),1/ Petitioner, Randall B. Johnson (Johnson), should be awarded reasonable costs and attorney’s fees incurred in defense of an administrative proceeding initiated by Respondent.Petitioner is not entitled to attorney's fees award pursuant to sections 120.595, Florida Statutes, because DOC is not a non-prevailing adverse party.

14-002617 LOU ARMENTROUT vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2014

Whether Respondent Department of Corrections (Respondent or the Department) constructively discharged Petitioner Lou Armentrout (Petitioner) in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, sections 760.01–760.11 and 509.092, Florida Statutes,1/ by subjecting Petitioner to a hostile work environment because of Petitioner’s race, age, or gender.Respondent constructively discharged Petitioner by subjecting her to a hostile work environment on account of Petitioner's race in violation of the Act and is entitled to relief.

14-002526 CHARLOTTE A. PINKERTON vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 28, 2014

Whether Respondent, Department of Corrections, discriminated against Petitioner, Charlotte Pinkerton, on the basis of her age, race, disability, or in retaliation, and, if so, what remedy should be ordered.Petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination or retaliation.

14-002527 MARKEITH DANIELS vs FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 28, 2014

Whether Respondent is liable to Petitioner for discrimination in employment on the basis of race, or in retaliation, in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992.Petitioner did not prove a prima facie case of employment discrimination. Petitioner proved a prima facie case of retaliation, but Respondent demonstrated legitimate non-discriminatory reasons for dismissal.

12-002616 PHILLIP RILEY vs LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 2012

The issue in this case is whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice by discriminating against Petitioner on the basis of his race and his gender.Petitioner did not prove race/gender discrimination. No competent evidence was offered to prove disparate treatment theory. Though not required, Respondent proved legitimate non-discriminatory reasons for firing Petitioner while he was on probation.

12-001524 NATALIE GOLDENBERG vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 2012

The issue is whether this case should be dismissed based on Petitioner's failure to appear at the hearing and apparent intent to withdraw her request for an administrative hearing.Petitioner did not appear at the hearing, apparently intending to withdraw her petition. Recommended dismissal of petition for relief from no cause determination.

11-004466 PATRICIA HERRING vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 01, 2011

Did Respondent, the Florida Department of Corrections (Department or DOC), sexually harass or discriminate against Petitioner, Patricia Herring (Herring), on account of her sex? Did DOC retaliate against Ms. Herring for opposing an unlawful employment practice?Petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of gender discrimination, sexual harassment or retaliation. Accordingly, her Petition for Relief should be dismissed.

10-001176 GERTRUDE BERRIEUM vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 10, 2010

The issues are whether Respondent discriminated against Petitioner based on a perceived disability and retaliated against her in violation of Section 760.10, Florida Statutes.Petitioner did not prove that Respondent discriminated against her based on a perceived disability.