Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Tucker Frazee Mackie
Tucker Frazee Mackie
Visitors: 29
0
Bar #41023(FL)     License for 17 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Tucker Frazee Mackie? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-007940  IN RE: PETITION TO MERGE THE MAIN STREET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND THE RIVERS EDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 18, 2010
The issue before the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (“Commission”) in this proceeding is whether to grant the Petition of the Rivers Edge Community Development District and the Main Street Community Development District (“Petition”), to merge the boundaries of the Rivers Edge Community Development District (“Rivers Edge”) and the Main Street Community Development District (“Main Street”) (collectively, the “Districts” or “Petitioners”). Under Section 190.005(1)(d), Florida Statutes, the local public hearing was conducted for the purpose of taking testimony and public comment and receiving exhibits. This Report of the public hearing and the hearing record is made for the consideration of the Commission in its determination whether to adopt a rule to merge the Districts’ boundaries.Report on proposal to merge two community development districts. No reason not to grant.
07-005750  IN RE: PETITION TO AMEND THE CROSSINGS AT FLEMING ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 19, 2007
The issue is whether the Petition to Amend the Boundaries of the Crossings at Fleming Island Community Development District (Petition) meets the applicable criteria set forth in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (2007)1, and Florida Administrative Code Rule Chapter 42-1. The purpose of the local public hearing was to gather information in anticipation of quasi-legislative rulemaking by the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (Commission).Petition to amend community development district boundaries by adding 21 acres met all statutory criteria; where the effect of expansion was de minimus, only consent of owners of the expansion parcels required, not all existing owners within the district.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer