Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Vernon L Whittier Jr.
Vernon L Whittier Jr.
Visitors: 112
0
Bar #270164(FL)    
Tallahassee FL

Are you Vernon L Whittier Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

88-000534  YOWELL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE REVIEW BOARD  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 08, 1988
The basic issue is whether the fines were properly assessed. This issue is determined by a consideration of whether the shipments in question were traveling in interstate or intrastate commerce. A secondary issue is which party has the burden of proof.Shipments were not exempt under reciprocal agreement. Petitioner failed to prove entitlement to an exemption and fines levied were proper.
87-005190  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. JIM DAVENPORT  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 20, 1988
Whether Respondent's sign is in violation of the applicable Florida Statutes?Removal of sign recommended. Unpermitted sign violated spacing requirement on federal-aid highway. Argument to waive requirement unpersuasive.
87-004590  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. REDDY ICE  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 05, 1988
The issue is whether a request by Reddy Ice for reimbursement of impact fees assessed by the Town of Davie when its ice manufacturing plant was displaced by the Department of Transportation for the construction of Interstate 595 should be granted under the relocation assistance program established pursuant to Section 421.55, Florida Statutes. STIPULATED FACTS 1/ Reddy Ice, Inc., an ice manufacturing company, received relocation assistance and related moving costs from the Florida Department of Transportation (Department) when its plant was moved due to the construction of Interstate 595 in Broward County, Florida. When Reddy Ice relocated its business to the Town of Davie in Broward County, it was paid $108,135.57 in relocation costs by the Department. The Town of Davie had an ordinance which required the payment of impact fees by a business such as Reddy Ice which uses large quantities of water. Payment of the impact fee was a prerequisite to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new facility. Reddy Ice was assessed and paid $71,937 as contribution charges to the Town of Davie. The payment was treated as a capital expense in the accounting records of Reddy Ice. The water and sewer service agreement Reddy Ice executed with Town of Davie Utilities Department provided for an upward adjustment of the charges if the actual water flow exceeds the estimated amount. There is no provision in the agreement for a downward adjustment of the impact fee in the event less water is used than was estimated. The impact fees are not reimbursed by the Town if the business moves to another location. Reddy Ice filed a claim with the district office of the Department of Transportation in Fort Lauderdale to recover the impact fees. The district office denied the claim because it was not specifically provided for in the list of eligible move costs categories specified in the Florida Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Policies Manual. See the Manual, Operating Procedures, Relocation Assistance, Section 3-2. The impact fee was considered an additional expense of operating in a new location, which was ineligible for reimbursement under Section 3-3 of the Right-of-Way Manual. The claim was then forwarded to the State relocation office in Tallahassee for review and determination. The State office concurred with the district determination. Because the claim for impact fees presented a relatively unique relocation issue, and federal funds are involved in the repayment of relocation costs for interstate highway construction, a national ruling was requested from the Federal Highway Administration. Ms. Barbara Reichart, Chief, Relocation Division, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., advised on May 27, 1987, that the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration Division Office were correct in their determination that impact fees were ineligible for reimbursement as relocation costs under 49 CFR Section 25.305(f). Impact fees are considered by the Federal Highway Administration to be an additional operating expense incurred by a business because of operating in a new location. Reddy Ice was advised of the final determination and denial of the claim by letter dated August 25, 1987, which resulted in this administrative proceeding.Ice manufacturer. relocated due to construction of I-595. Department followed advice of Federal highway administration that impact fee for water at new site not reimbursable.
87-005557  WILLIE C. HAGGINS vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 01, 1988
Employee found to have abandoned his job by failing to get approval for sick leave.
87-005443  JERRY C. SCARBOROUGH vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 30, 1988
Change of zoning to meet requirement for zoning despite some appearances of spot zoning.
87-003649  GATOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 21, 1988
Sign permit granted and other permits revoked due to landowner's agreement for use of land and spacing requests.
88-000238  DONTO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 04, 1988
Application for permit does not meet spacing requirement

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer