welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Vivian Jacqueline Arenas
Vivian Jacqueline Arenas
Vivian Jacqueline Arenas
Visitors: 57
0
Bar #1012303(FL)     License for 6 years; Member in Good Standing
Lake Worth FL

Are you Vivian Jacqueline Arenas? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

01-001081  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.
01-001082  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.
92-000953  ALAN R. BEHRENS vs CONSOLIDATED MINERALS, INC., AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 1992
Whether the Southwest Florida Water Management District ("District") should renew and modify an existing water use permit held by Consolidated Minerals, Inc. ("CMI") authorizing groundwater withdrawals at CMI's proposed "Pine Level" phosphate mine operation in DeSoto County, Florida. Whether the water use requested in CMI's permit renewal application meets all the criteria specified in Rule 40D-2.301, Florida Administrative Code ("F.A.C"), with the exception of 40D-2.301(1)(d), F.A.C.; and Whether CMI is exempt from the District's surface water management system permitting requirements as contained in Rule 40D-2.301(1)(d), F.A.C.Applicant for water use permit failed to provide reasonable assurances that use will not cause adverse impact to water resources and environment.
91-002704  WYATT S. BISHOP, JR. vs SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL BOARD, D/B/A SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 1991
The issue for consideration herein is whether Sarasota County Utilities should be issued a consumptive use permit to draw water from the 14 wells in issue here located in Sarasota County.Once applicant establishes entitlement to permit protestant must show he has not given reasonable assurances approval will not harm public interest.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer