welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Vivian Jacqueline Arenas
Vivian Jacqueline Arenas
Vivian Jacqueline Arenas
Visitors: 52
0
Bar #1012303(FL)     License for 6 years; Member in Good Standing
Lake Worth FL

Are you Vivian Jacqueline Arenas? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-000791  PEACE RIVER/MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000792  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000804  ALAN R. BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000805  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC. vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-001610  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
05-000344  MIAMI CORPORATION AND VERGIE CLARK vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 18, 2007
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
05-002607  VERGIE CLARK vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 20, 2005
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
05-002940  MIAMI CORPORATION vs CITY OF TITUSVILLE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2005
The issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) should issue a consumptive use permit (CUP) in response to Application Number 99052 filed by the City of Titusville and, if so, what CUP terms are appropriate.Public water supply consumptive use permit application met all criteria except for the allocation amount which the Recommended Order reduces.
02-004134  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 21, 2002
The issues are whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should: grant the application filed by IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for modification of the approved Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP) for the Four Corners/Lonesome Mine, IMC-FCL-CPD; and issue a Consolidated Environmental Resource/Wetland Resource Permit No. 0155875-004 (Draft Permit) to mine phosphate and reclaim land on the Altman Tract in the northeastern corner of Manatee County.Based on findings as to disputed facts, phosphate mine reclamation plan did not maintain or improve biological functions of wetlands impacted (and had other defects); mitigation for wetland impacts was insufficient; other required assurances not given.
01-001080  MANASOTA-88, INC. vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer