Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
William Edward Sexton
William Edward Sexton
Visitors: 23
1
Bar #37197(FL)     License for 17 years; Member in Good Standing
Starke FL

Are you William Edward Sexton? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52120.54120.541120.56120.569120.68373.042373.0421373.709

14-001420RU  PAUL STILL vs SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issues to be determined in this case are whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, 62-42.300, and a document incorporated by reference (“the Proposed Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority; whether the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) complied with statutory requirements regarding preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) for the Proposed Rules; and whether the approval by the Governing Board of the Suwannee River Water Management District (“SRWMD”) of a document entitled “Recovery Strategy: Lower Santa Fe River Basin” (“Recovery Strategy”) is invalid because it required rulemaking.It is concluded that proposed rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, and the Supplemental Regulatory Measures incorporated by reference in rule 62.-42.300(1)(d) are valid, but proposed rules 62-42.300(1)(a) and (b) are invalid because they are vague.
14-001421RP  PAUL STILL vs SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 2014
The issues to be determined in this case are whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, 62-42.300, and a document incorporated by reference (“the Proposed Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority; whether the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) complied with statutory requirements regarding preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) for the Proposed Rules; and whether the approval by the Governing Board of the Suwannee River Water Management District (“SRWMD”) of a document entitled “Recovery Strategy: Lower Santa Fe River Basin” (“Recovery Strategy”) is invalid because it required rulemaking.It is concluded that proposed rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, and the Supplemental Regulatory Measures incorporated by reference in rule 62.-42.300(1)(d) are valid, but proposed rules 62-42.300(1)(a) and (b) are invalid because they are vague.
14-001443RP  PAUL STILL vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 2014
The issues to be determined in this case are whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, 62-42.300, and a document incorporated by reference (“the Proposed Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority; whether the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) complied with statutory requirements regarding preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) for the Proposed Rules; and whether the approval by the Governing Board of the Suwannee River Water Management District (“SRWMD”) of a document entitled “Recovery Strategy: Lower Santa Fe River Basin” (“Recovery Strategy”) is invalid because it required rulemaking.It is concluded that proposed rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, and the Supplemental Regulatory Measures incorporated by reference in rule 62.-42.300(1)(d) are valid, but proposed rules 62-42.300(1)(a) and (b) are invalid because they are vague.
14-001644RP  FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 11, 2014
The issues to be determined in this case are whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, 62-42.300, and a document incorporated by reference (“the Proposed Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority; whether the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) complied with statutory requirements regarding preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) for the Proposed Rules; and whether the approval by the Governing Board of the Suwannee River Water Management District (“SRWMD”) of a document entitled “Recovery Strategy: Lower Santa Fe River Basin” (“Recovery Strategy”) is invalid because it required rulemaking.It is concluded that proposed rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, and the Supplemental Regulatory Measures incorporated by reference in rule 62.-42.300(1)(d) are valid, but proposed rules 62-42.300(1)(a) and (b) are invalid because they are vague.
08-002719  CRAIG W. PATTERSON AND TIMOTHY BUFFKIN vs BRADFORD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 09, 2008
The issue in this case is whether the Bradford County Board of County Commissioners should approve or deny an application to rezone a 12.76-acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Highway 301 and County Road 18 in unincorporated Bradford County (“the Property”) from Residential, (Mixed) Single Family/Mobile Home (RSF/MH-1) to Commercial Intensive (CI).Applicants for re-zoning demonstrated that the Commerical- Intensive zoning was consistent with the comprehensive plan and land development regulations.
20-000091  PAUL STILL vs SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND BRADFORD COUNTY, FLORIDA,  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 2020
The issue to be determined is whether Bradford County meets the criteria listed in Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-330.051(4)(e) for a road repair exemption.Bradford County was entitled to an exemption for road repair to repair storm damaged S.W. 101st Avenue.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer