Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
William George Salim, Jr.
William George Salim, Jr.
Visitors: 47
1
Bar #750379(FL)     License for 36 years
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you William George Salim, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

14-005300BID  TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (USA), INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION vs SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 2014
Whether, in issuing the Revised Recommendation/Tabulation for contracts for Items 1 and 3 for Invitation to Bid No. 15- 048E, Multifunctional Devices, Cost-Per-Copy, Respondent acted contrary to one or more governing statutes, rules, policies, or procurement specifications, or any combination thereof; and if so, for each such instance, whether the misstep was clearly erroneous, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to competition.Petitioner failed to show that the School Board's intended award was contrary to its governing rules, policies or solicition specifications or that the School Board's actions were clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, or capricious.
13-001222  BOCA BAY DUI PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 2013
The issue is whether denial of Petitioner's Application for DUI Program Licensure was appropriate.Petitioner demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that its application met all applicable criteria. Recommend awarding Petitioner a license to operate a DUI program in the 17th Judicial Circuit.
06-004499BID  PHIL`S EXPERT TREE SERVICE vs BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 09, 2006
The issues in this bid protest are whether Intervenor's bid was nonresponsive because Intervenor, a corporation formed in 2005, lacks the required five years' experience in the tree trimming business; and, if so, whether Respondent's preliminary decision to award Intervenor the contract at issue was clearly erroneous, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to competition.Respondent`s decision to award a contract for tree trimming services to a corporation lacking five years` experience was erroneous or contrary to competition; both bids, the contract recipient and protester were nonresponsive. Each should be rejected.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer