Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Werts v. State, 98-2368 (1999)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 98-2368 Visitors: 59
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jan. 08, 1999
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 722 So. 2d 982 (1999) Charles Michael WERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 98-2368 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 8, 1999. Charles Michael Werts, Raiford, Pro Se. No Appearance For Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the lower court's denial of the most recent Rule 3.800(a) attack on Charles Michael Werts' sentence. This is the fifth Rule 3.800(a) motion, and the ninth appeal to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. CR84-4432. E
More
722 So. 2d 982 (1999)

Charles Michael WERTS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-2368

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 8, 1999.

Charles Michael Werts, Raiford, Pro Se.

No Appearance For Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court's denial of the most recent Rule 3.800(a) attack on Charles Michael Werts' sentence. This is the fifth Rule 3.800(a) motion, and the ninth appeal to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. CR84-4432. Enough is enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. CR84-4432. As this court did in Davis v. State, 705 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Bradley v. State, 703 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Rooney v. State, 699 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); and O'Brien v. State, 689 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So. 2d 511 (Fla.1997), defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer