Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 15, 1963
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: 372 U.S. 708 (1963) LUCKMAN v. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL. No. 63, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided April 15, 1963. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John S. McInerny, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated
Summary: 372 U.S. 708 (1963) LUCKMAN v. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL. No. 63, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided April 15, 1963. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John S. McInerny, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated ..
More
372 U.S. 708 (1963)
LUCKMAN
v.
DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
No. 63, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided April 15, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John S. McInerny, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
