Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Transportation
Latest Update: May 15, 1975
Summary: Whether subject signs should be removed for failure to secure current permits and for failure to keep signs in good repair.Respondent repeatedly failed to secure permits for and to refurbish unsightly signs. Recommend removal of signs.
75-0117.PDFSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, )
)
Petitioner, )
) CASE NO. 75-117T
vs. ) DOCKET NO. 75-109-OA
) RIVERS ADVERTISING COMPANY, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
After notice to the parties, a formal administrative hearing, pursuant to the Florida Administrative Procedures Act, was held in DeLand, Florida, on April 11, 1975, before Delphene Strickland, Hearing Examiner.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Tom King
Chuck Chtenberger Francis Bayley, Esquire
For Respondent: No appearance
ISSUES
Whether subject signs should be removed for failure to secure current permits and for failure to keep signs in good repair.
FINDINGS OF FACT
No currents permits were secured for subject signs and said signs are in a poor and unsightly condition with damaged faces. Letters in the file show owner promised to refurbish subject signs on September 12, 1974 and also March 31, 1975. At date of hearing the sign was in the same unsightly condition. Notice of Violation was sent September 3, 1974.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Signs without current permits and signs in unsightly conditions are in violation of state and federal law and are subject to be removed by the Department of Transportation.
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Remove signs within five (5) days of date of Final order.
DELPHENE STRICKLAND
Hearing Examiner
Date: 5/15/75
Docket for Case No: 75-000117
Orders for Case No: 75-000117
| Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
|
May 15, 1975 |
Recommended Order
|
Respondent repeatedly failed to secure permits for and to refurbish unsightly signs. Recommend removal of signs.
|
