Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Transportation
Latest Update: May 14, 1975
Summary: Whether subject sign required current permits and whether said signs were in an "unsightly condition".Respondent's signs were unsightly/unpermitted, but subsequently these violations were cleared. Recommended Order/Final Order: dismiss complaint where there were no longer any violations by Respondent.
75-0120.PDFSTATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, )
)
Petitioner, )
) CASE NO. 75-120T
vs. ) DOCKET NO. 75-106-OA
) NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
After notice to the parties, a formal administrative hearing, pursuant to the Florida Administrative Procedures Act, was held in DeLand, Florida, on April 11, 1975, before Delphene Strickland, Hearing Examiner.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Francis Bayley, Esquire
Glen McCutcheon
For Respondent: William Rowland, Esquire
ISSUES
Whether subject sign required current permits and whether said signs were in an "unsightly condition".
FINDINGS OF FACT
Previous to the date of this Recommended Order subject signs were properly permitted and refurbished to remove them from the "unsightly" violation category.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
When violations are cleared parties should be notified.
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Dismiss the petition inasmuch as the state and federal violations have been cleared.
DELPHENE STRICKLAND
Hearing Examiner
Date: 5/14/75
Docket for Case No: 75-000120
Orders for Case No: 75-000120
| Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
|
May 14, 1975 |
Recommended Order
|
Respondent's signs were unsightly/unpermitted, but subsequently these violations were cleared. Recommended Order/Final Order: dismiss complaint where there were no longer any violations by Respondent.
|
