Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

J. DANIEL METHVIN vs. ORLOWSKI PRODUCE COMPANY, INC., 79-000116 (1979)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 79-000116 Visitors: 12
Judges: CHARLES C. ADAMS
Agency: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 1979
Summary: Whether the Petitioner, J. Daniel Methvin, is entitled to the payment of $93,894.82 as proceeds due the Petitioner for fifty loads of potatoes delivered to the Respondent, 0rlowski Produce Co., Inc.Petitioner entitled to share in Respondent's bond proceeds for Respondent's failure to pay for produce delivered under contract.
79-0116.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


J. DANIEL MELVIN )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 79-116A

) ORLOWSKI PRODUCE CO., INC., )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held before Charles C. Adams, a Hearing Officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings, in Palatka, Florida, at 10:00 a.m., May 1, 1979.


APPEARANCES


J. Daniel Methvin of Route 1, Box 104 AB, East Palatka, Florida, appeared as Petitioner. Robert A. Chastain, Esquire, who is the General Counsel of the State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Mayo Building, Tallahassee, Florida 32301, appeared on behalf of that Department. Although the Respondent had received proper notice of this hearing, it did not appear. (An explanation of the non-appearance is discussed in the Order of the undersigned dated April 30, 1979, which Order denied the Respondent's request for a continuance of the May 1, 1979, hearing date in the case at issue.)


ISSUE


Whether the Petitioner, J. Daniel Methvin, is entitled to the payment of

$93,894.82 as proceeds due the Petitioner for fifty loads of potatoes delivered to the Respondent, 0rlowski Produce Co., Inc.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. The Respondent, Orlowski Produce Co., Inc., was licensed as a dealer in agricultural products for the period April 20, 1978, to September 24, 1978, which license was issued by the State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. In connection with its activity in the State of Florida, the Respondent was required to make a surety bond in the amount of $20,000.00 as security for its business transactions with Florida agricultural producers, their agents or representatives for those agricultural products bought from or handled or sold for the Florida agricultural producers, their agents or representatives. The licensure provisions and requirement for bond are set out in the Sections 604.15 through 604.30, Florida Statutes. A copy of the license and bond may be found in the State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Composite Exhibit No. 1 admitted into evidence. All exhibits of that Department will henceforth be referred to as "Department Exhibits."

  2. The Petitioner, J. Daniel Methvin, a producer of agricultural products in the State of Florida, filed a complaint with the State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, alleging that the Respondent failed to pay moneys due and owing to the Petitioner for fifty bulk loads of potatoes. This complaint was filed on October 3, 1978, and may be found as Department's Exhibit No. 2 admitted into evidence. Following the filing of the complaint and in keeping with Section 604.21, Florida Statutes, the Department informed the Respondent that a complaint had been filed by forwarding the notice and complaint by certified mail with a return receipt requested. A copy of the notice of filing a complaint and return receipt may be found as Department's Composite Exhibit No. 3 admitted into evidence. The Respondent did not reply to the Methvin complaint, notwithstanding the fact that one of its officials had signed the return receipt request, indicating that it had received the complaint and explanation.


  3. In view of the fact that the Respondent had failed to reply to the complaint within the twenty-five days allowed to answer the complaint, and had failed to request a hearing within that twenty-five-day period, the Commissioner of Agriculture, State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, entered an order in favor of the Petitioner. A copy of this order was served on the Respondent by certified mail with a return receipt requested. The Respondent received that order. The order itself nay be found as the Department's Exhibit No. 4 admitted into evidence.


  4. In the order, the Commissioner of Agriculture makes the following findings of fact:


    1. Complainant, J. Daniel Methvin, is an individual whose address is Route 1, Box 104 AB, East Palatka, Florida.

    2. Respondent, Orlowski Produce Company, is a corporation whose address is Post Office Box 128, Water Mill, New York. At the time of the transactions involved, respondent was licensed as a dealer in agricultural products supported by surety bond in the amount of$20,000.00.

    3. Between May 16, 1978 and June 9, 1978, the respondent received 50 loads of bulk potatoes from the complainant.

    4. The respondent has furnished the complainant an itemized listing of each load showing the vehicle number, date, quantity, price, deductions and net due.

    5. The accounting shows an amount of

      $96,892.81 as the proceeds due the complainant on the 50 loads of potatoes.

    6. There are mathematical errors found in the accounting, to wit; the overall total of the figures shown should be $93,891.81 not

      $93,892.81; the transaction on May 18 shown as

      $1,617.51 should be $1,618.51; the entire transaction shown on June 2 as $2,402.75 should be shown as $2,404.76. These errors, when taken into consideration, makes the correct total for the 50 loads of potatoes

      $96,894.82.

    7. The respondent gave the complainant an

      advance of $3,000 which leaves a net balance of $93,894.82.

    8. The complaint was received in this office within nine (9) months from the date of the last transaction.

    9. There are no known disputed facts in this matter.


      The Commissioner of Agriculture also concluded as a matter of law that the Respondent was justly indebted to the Petitioner in the amount of $93,894.82 and for that reason had violated the conditions and provisions of the bond, within the meaning of Subsection 604.21(1), Florida Statutes. After establishing the apparatus for default judgment, the Commissioner of Agriculture afforded the Respondent and others with a material interest in the outcome of the case, one final opportunity to request a hearing before the Commissioner of Agriculture's conclusions of law became binding. The Respondent, in the person of one of its officers, Robert Carpenter, made such a request for a hearing, but having made such a request, elected not to attend the hearing, for reasons that are mare completely detailed through the pleadings filed in this cause.


  5. On the date and time scheduled for hearing, alluded to in the introductory statement of this Order, a de novo hearing was conducted. Testimony was offered and that testimony substantiated the findings of fact of the Commissioner of Agriculture in his order of December 7, 1978, except paragraph nine (9). Therefore, those findings of fact reported herein, excepting paragraph nine (9), are adopted as the findings of fact of this Hearing Officer.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  6. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and parties to this action.


  7. Based upon a full consideration of the facts herein, it is concluded as a matter of law that the Respondent owes the Petitioner an amount of $93,894.82 for fifty loads of potatoes which the Petitioner delivered to the Respondent and it is further concluded that the Petitioner is entitled to share in the bond proceeds of the bond which is filed with the state of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. See Sections 604.15 through 604.30, Florida Statutes.


RECOMMENDATION


It is recommended that the State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, uphold the claim of the Petitioner, J. Daniel Methvin, against Orlowski Produce Co., Inc., in the amount of $93,894.82, and allow the Petitioner to share in the bond proceeds which the Respondent, Orlowski Produce Co., Inc., has on file with the State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

DONE AND ENTERED this 17th day of May, 1979, in Tallahassee, Florida.


CHARLES C. ADAMS

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 101, Collins Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


J. Daniel Methvin Route 1, Box 104 AB East Palatka, Florida


Leonard Hanser, Esquire 1509 North Military Trail

West Palm Beach, Florida 33409


Robert A. Chastain, Esquire Department of Agriculture and

Consumer Services Mayo Building

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Docket for Case No: 79-000116
Issue Date Proceedings
Jun. 21, 1979 Final Order filed.
May 17, 1979 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 79-000116
Issue Date Document Summary
Jun. 20, 1979 Agency Final Order
May 17, 1979 Recommended Order Petitioner entitled to share in Respondent's bond proceeds for Respondent's failure to pay for produce delivered under contract.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer