STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
ANTHONY PATERNO, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 91-5270
) FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to written Notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, Daniel Manry, held a formal hearing in the above-styled case on October 17, 1991, in Miami, Florida.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Mr. Anthony J. Paterno, pro se
2151 Northeast 167th Street, Apartment 4 North Miami Beach, Florida 33162
For Respondent: Manuel E. Oliver, Esquire
Assistant Attorney General
400 West Robinson Street, Suite 107 South Orlando, Florida 32801
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Petitioner's application for licensure as a real estate salesman should be granted.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
By letter dated August 20, 1991, Respondent notified Petitioner that his application for licensure as a real estate
salesman had been denied. Petitioner requested a formal hearing, and the matter was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for assignment of a hearing officer on August 22, 1991. The proceeding was assigned to the undersigned on August 27, 1991. A formal hearing was scheduled for October 3, 1991, pursuant to a Notice of Hearing issued on September 11, 1991, and then rescheduled for October 17, 1991.
At the formal hearing, Petitioner testified in his own behalf, presented the testimony of Ms. Amy Jones, a clinical therapist at Bethesda Manner.
Bethesda Manner is the residential component at St. Luke's Center. Ms. Jones has a Master's degree and was qualified as an expert in addiction treatment. Petitioner submitted six exhibits for admission in evidence. Petitioner's Exhibits 1 and 2 were admitted in evidence without objection. 1/ Petitioner's Exhibit 3-6 were admitted in evidence over objection. 2/ Petitioner's Exhibits
5 and 6 were late filed exhibits. Respondent called no witnesses and submitted one exhibit for admission in evidence. Respondent's Exhibit 1 was admitted in evidence without objection. 3/
A transcript of the record of the formal hearing was filed with the undersigned on October 31, 1991. Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law were timely filed by Respondent on November 25, 1991. Petitioner did not file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Respondent determined that Petitioner is not qualified for licensure as a real estate salesman due to Petitioner's criminal record. Petitioner voluntarily disclosed his criminal record in response to Question 7 on the application for licensure. On June 30, 1990, Petitioner was charged with resisting arrest without violence. On July 2, 1991, Petitioner was charged with attempted robbery.
Both charges were processed in Circuit Court in Dade County, Florida. Case No. 90-26052 involved the charge of resisting arrest. Case No. 90-26276 involved the charge of attempted robbery.
Petitioner entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge of attempted robbery on October 15, 1990. Adjudication of guilt was withheld and Petitioner was placed on probation for 12 months. Petitioner's probation was terminated successfully after
three months by an Order Successfully Terminating Probation entered on February 11, 1991.
On July 10, 1991, an order was entered expunging and sealing the record with respect to the charge of resisting arrest. Respondent was ". . . restored in the contemplation of the law to the status the Defendant occupied before such arrest."
Petitioner's voluntary disclosure of his prior criminal charges complied with the express terms of his application for licensure. His prior criminal involvement was caused by substance addiction. He has been successfully rehabilitated from that addiction and is able to carry out his responsibilities if he becomes licensed as a real estate salesman.
Petitioner began working with a landscape contractor approximately 10 months ago. Petitioner began as a field worker and is now carrying out management functions, including: placing laborers at job sites; depositing money in his employer's bank account; handling the business payroll; and making payments for materials at the job sites.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter in this proceeding. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. The parties were duly noticed for the formal hearing.
Petitioner, as the applicant, has the burden of proof in this proceeding. Florida Department of Transportation v. J.W.C. Company, Inc., 396 So.2d 778, 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 19810; Balino v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 348 So.2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Petitioner must
demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that he is qualified for licensure.
Petitioner satisfied his burden of proof in this proceeding. Petitioner responded truthfully to questions regarding his criminal record. Untruthfully responding to inquiries of the Respondent is a valid ground for denying a license. Gentile, M.D., v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medical Examiners, 448 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Such an act evidences sufficient lack of good moral character to deny Petitioner's application for a license as a real estate salesman. Petitioner is not an untruthful applicant that lacks sufficient moral character for licensure as a real estate salesman.
Petitioner voluntarily sought professional treatment for his substance abuse and has been successfully rehabilitated. The expert testimony presented by Petitioner and Petitioner's own testimony explaining the causes of his prior criminal record and his voluntary treatment and rehabilitation were credible and persuasive.
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that Respondent enter a Final Order granting Petitioner's
application for licensure as a real estate salesman.
DONE AND ORDERED in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this 22nd day of January 1992.
DANIEL MANRY
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 23rd day of January 1992.
ENDNOTES
1/ Petitioner's Exhibit 1 is a certified copy of an Order On Motion To Expunge And Seal Court Records. Petitioner's Exhibit 2 is a copy of an Order Successfully Terminating Probation.
2/ Petitioner's Exhibit 3 is a hand written letter from Petitioner's employer. Petitioner's Exhibit 4 is a copy of a hand written letter from Mr. Paul Ingles, Associate Addictions Professional. Petitioner's Exhibits 5 and 6 are Affidavits from individuals who affirm Petitioner's good character.
3/ Respondent's Exhibit 1 is a composite exhibit consisting of Petitioner's application for licensure and related internal documents prepared by Respondent.
APPENDIX TO RECOMMENDED ORDER
Petitioner submitted no proposed findings of fact.
Respondent submitted proposed findings of fact. It has been noted below which proposed findings of fact have been generally accepted and the paragraph number(s) in the Recommended Order where they have been accepted, if any. Those proposed findings of fact which have been rejected and the reason for their rejection have also been noted. No notation is made for unnumbered paragraphs.
The Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact
Proposed Finding Paragraph Number in Recommended Order of Fact Number of Acceptance or Reason for Rejection
Accepted in Preliminary Statement
Accepted in Finding 1
Accepted in Findings 1-3
Accepted in Finding 4
Accepted in Finding 3
6-7 Rejected as recited testimony
8 Accepted in Finding 6
9-11 Rejected as recited testimony
12-13 Rejected as conclusions of law
COPIES FURNISHED:
Darlene F. Keller, Director Division of Real Estate Department of Professional
Regulation
400 West Robinson Street
P.O. Box 1900
Orlando, FL 32802-1900
Jack McRay, Esquire General Counsel
Department of Professional Regulation
1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0792
Manuel E. Oliver, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Suite 107 South
400 West Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801
Anthony Paterno pro se
2151 Northeast 167th Street Apt. 4
North Miami Beach, Florida 33162
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions to this Recommended Order. All agencies allow each party at least 10 days in which to submit written exceptions. Some agencies allow a larger period within which to submit written exceptions. You should contact the agency that will issue the final order in this case concerning agency rules on the deadline for filing exceptions to this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Feb. 26, 1992 | Final Order filed. |
Jan. 27, 1992 | Letter to DSM from Anthony J. Paterno (re: petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order) filed. |
Jan. 23, 1992 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 10/17/91. |
Nov. 25, 1991 | Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed. |
Nov. 12, 1991 | Respondent's Exceptions to Late Filed Affidavits as Exhibits w/attached Affidavits filed. |
Nov. 06, 1991 | General Affidavits (2) w/cover Letter filed. (From Anthony J. Paterno) |
Oct. 31, 1991 | Transcript of Proceedings (Vols 1&2) filed. |
Sep. 27, 1991 | Order Rescheduling Hearing sent out. (hearing rescheduled for October 17, 1991: 1:00 PM: Miami) |
Sep. 11, 1991 | Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for October 3, 1991: 9:30 am: Miami) |
Sep. 09, 1991 | (Respondent) Response to Initial Order and Request filed. (From Manuel E. Oliver) |
Sep. 09, 1991 | Letter. to DSM from Anthony J. Paterno re: Reply to Initial Order filed. |
Aug. 27, 1991 | Initial Order issued. |
Aug. 21, 1991 | Agency Referral Letter; Request for Administrative Hearing, letter form; Agency Action letter filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Feb. 21, 1992 | Agency Final Order | |
Jan. 23, 1992 | Recommended Order | Appl. for license as R/E sales should be granted where applicant vol. dis- closed prior substance abuse and showed successful compl. of rehab. program |