Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SUNWAY RESTAURANT CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 92-003514RX (1992)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 92-003514RX Visitors: 17
Petitioner: SUNWAY RESTAURANT CORPORATION
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Judges: MARY CLARK
Agency: Department of Transportation
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Jun. 12, 1992
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Thursday, July 16, 1992.

Latest Update: Jul. 16, 1992
Summary: Petitioner, Sunway Restaurant Corporation, and Respondent, Department of Transportation, have entered into a stipulation regarding entry of a final order in this proceeding. Under the Stipulation, this proceeding is limited to a challenge to the validity of an existing rule pursuant to Section 120.56, Florida Statutes, and the sole issue before the Division in this proceeding is whether the February 28, 1990 repeal of Rule 14-85.003(15)(b) was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authori
More
92-3514

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


SUNWAY RESTAURANT )

CORPORATION, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 92-3514RX

) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, )

)

Respondent. )

)


FINAL ORDER


Petitioner, Sunway Restaurant Corporation, and Respondent, Department of Transportation, have entered into a stipulation regarding entry of a final order in this proceeding.

  1. Under the Stipulation, this proceeding is limited to a challenge to the validity of an existing rule pursuant to Section 120.56, Florida Statutes, and the sole issue before the Division in this proceeding is whether the February 28, 1990 repeal of Rule 14-85.003(15)(b) was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, as defined in Section 120.52(8)(a), Florida Statutes, for materially failing to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54(13)(b), Florida Statutes. Under the Stipulation, the challenge to the repeal of Rule 14-85.003(15)(b) pursuant to Section 120.54(4), Florida Statutes, has been withdrawn and all grounds for challenging the repeal of Rule 14-85.003(15)(b), other than those set forth above, have been withdrawn.

  2. Upon consideration of the terms of the stipulation, it is determined that the stipulation should be approved and that the following stipulated findings of fact and conclusions of law should be entered.


    FINDINGS OF FACT


  3. The Respondent's February 28, 1990 repeal of Rule 14-85.003(15)(b) was not reflected in the Respondent's original Notice of Rulemaking and was a change in the rule that affected the substance of the rule. This change was not supported by the record of the public hearing held on the rule amendment nor written comments submitted to the Respondent, nor was it in response to a proposed objection by the Joint Administrative Procedures Committee.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  4. The February 28, 1990 repeal of Rule 14-85.003(15)(b) of the rule was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, as defined in Section 120.52(8)(a), Florida Statutes as the repeal of paragraph (15)(b) was a change in the rule that did not meet the applicable rulemaking procedures of Section 120.54(13)(b), Florida Statutes.

ORDER


Based on the above, it is ORDERED:


  1. That the Respondent's February 28, 1990 repeal of Rule 14-85.003(15)(b) was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority and is invalid.


  2. That the repeal of Rule 14-85.003(15)(b) shall become void when the time for appeal of this Order has expired.


  3. That this Order shall be without prejudice to the Respondent's ability to initiate rulemaking pursuant to Section 120.54, Florida Statutes, to repeal Rule 14-85.003(15)(b) and shall be without prejudice to Petitioner's ability to challenge such rulemaking.


  4. The hearing scheduled for July 13, 1992 has been cancelled, and Burger King Corporation's Petition for Leave to Intervene is denied as moot.


DONE and ENTERED this 16th day of July, 1992, in Tallahassee, Florida.



MARY CLARK,

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 16th day of July, 1992.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Theodore Mack, Esquire Cobb, Cole & Bell

315 S. Calhoun St., Suite 500 Tallahassee, FL 32301


Paul Sexton, Asst. General Counsel Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Bldg., MS 58

605 Suwanee Street

Tallahassee, FL 32399-0458


M. Christopher Bryant, Esquire Oertel, Hoffman, Fernandez

& Cole, P.A.

P.O. Box 6507

Tallahassee, FL 32314-6507

Carroll Webb, Executive Director Administrative Procedures Committee Holland Building, Room 120 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300


Thornton J. Williams, General Counsel Department of Transportation

562 Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, FL 32399-0458


Ben G. Watts, Secretary Department of Transportation 605 Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, FL 32399-0458


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW


A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS ARE GOVERNED BY THE FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. SUCH PROCEEDINGS ARE COMMENCED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF THE DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND A SECOND COPY, ACCOMPANIED BY FILING FEES PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, OR WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE PARTY RESIDES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED.


Docket for Case No: 92-003514RX
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 16, 1992 CASE CLOSED. Final Order sent out. (facts stipulated)
Jul. 08, 1992 (Petitioner) Stipulation filed.
Jul. 06, 1992 Burger King Corporation`s Petition for Leave to Intervene w/Exhibits A-C filed.
Jun. 18, 1992 Order for Accelerated Discovery and for Prehearing Statement sent out. (prehearing stipulation required by this Order shall be filed no later than 2 days before the hearing)
Jun. 18, 1992 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 7-13-92; 9:00am; Tallahassee)
Jun. 17, 1992 Order of Assignment sent out.
Jun. 15, 1992 Letter to Liz Cloud & Carroll Webb from Marguerite Lockard
Jun. 12, 1992 Petition for Administrative Determination of the Invalidity of Existing and Proposed Rules filed.

Orders for Case No: 92-003514RX
Issue Date Document Summary
Jul. 16, 1992 DOAH Final Order As stipualtion by parties attempted repeal of rule was invalid for failure to comply with 120.54(13)(b)
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer