Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GERALD A. ROBBINS vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, 94-002720RP (1994)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 94-002720RP Visitors: 34
Petitioner: GERALD A. ROBBINS
Respondent: SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Water Management Districts
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: May 12, 1994
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Friday, June 30, 1995.

Latest Update: Oct. 14, 1997
Summary: Whether Respondent's proposed amendments to subsections (1) and (7) of Rule 40D-4.051, Florida Administrative Code are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.Agency withdrew proposed amendments making rule challenge moot. Challenge to portion of rule unchanged by amendments should be 120.56 not 120.54.
94-2720.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


GERALD A. ROBBINS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 94-2720RP

) SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER ) MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, )

)

Respondent. )

)


SUMMARY FINAL ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, Susan B. Kirkland, held a hearing on Respondent's Motion to Dismiss by telephonic conference on April 11, 1995.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Gerald Robbins, Pro Se

1026 Biltmore Drive Northwest Winter Haven, Florida 33881


For Respondent: James A. Robinson

Senior Attorney

Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street

Brooksville, Florida 34609-6899 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

Whether Respondent's proposed amendments to subsections (1) and (7) of Rule 40D-4.051, Florida Administrative Code are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


On May 13, 1994, Petitioner, Gerald A. Robbins, filed a Petition to Challenge Proposed Rule 40D-4.051. On May 20, 1994, Petitioner filed an Amended Petition to Challenge Proposed Rule 40D-4.051, requesting that subsections (1) and (7) be declared invalid as an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Respondent, Southwest Florida Water Management District, filed a Motion to Dismiss Petition. The parties waived the 30 day requirement set forth in Section 120.54(4)(c), Florida Statutes. By Order dated June 28, 1994, the undersigned Hearing Officer dismissed the portion of the rule challenge as it related to Subsection (7). Petitioner appealed the Order in Gerald Robbins v.

Southwest Florida Water Management District, Case No. 94-1717, 5th District Court of Appeal. By Order dated October 10, 1994, the court denied Petitioner's Petition for Review of Non-Final Administrative Action. Petitioner filed a

Motion for Clarification of Order and Petition to Enforce Mandate of This Court. The court denied the untimely motion by Order dated December 7, 1994.


On February 13, 1995, Respondent filed Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. On February 21, 1995, the undersigned Hearing Officer entered an Order to Show Cause, requiring the Petitioner to file a response showing cause why the Motion to Dismiss should not be granted. On March 9, 1995, Petitioner filed Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and Petitioner's Response to Order to Show Cause. On March 27, 1995, Petitioner filed a Supplement to Petitioner's Response to Show Cause Order.


A hearing was held on the Motion to Dismiss by telephonic conference on April 11, 1995.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. On April 22, 1994, Respondent, Southwest Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), published proposed amendments to Rule 40D-4.051 in the Florida Administrative Weekly, Volume 20, Number 16, at page 2450. The portions which are the subject of this proceedings are as follows:


    * 40D-4.051 Exemptions

    <<(1) Exemptions are found in>> [[The following activities are exempt from permitting under this chapter:

    1. The activities specified in]] Sections 373.406, Florida Statutes.

      (2)-(7) No Change.


      * Note: In the above quotation, language added to the statute

      is within the <<>>; deleted language is within the [[]].


  2. On May 13, 1994, Petitioner, Gerald A. Robbins, filed a Petition to Challenge Proposed Rule 40D-4.051. On May 20, 1994, Petitioner filed an Amended Petition to Challenge Proposed Rule 40D-4.051.


  3. In its rule challenge, Petitioner requests that 40D-4.051(1) be rewritten as follows: "Exemptions are as found in Sections 373.406 AND 403.927 Florida Statutes."


  4. On July 1, 1994, Respondent withdrew its proposed amendment to Subsection (1) of Rule 40D-4.051. The following Notice of Withdrawal appeared in Florida Administrative Weekly, Volume 20, No. 26:


    Southwest Florida Water Management District RULE TITLES: RULE NOS.:

    Exemptions 40D-4.051(1)


    NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL


    Notice is hereby given that the above proposed rule amendment, published in the Florida Administrative Weekly, Volume 20, Number 16,

    on Page 2450, April 22, 1994, have (sic) been withdrawn. This is the sole subsection being withdrawn from rulemaking pursuant to Section 120.54(13)(b), Florida Statutes. The remainder

    of the proposed amendments to Section 40D-4.051, Florida Administrative Code remains subject to Section 120.54(1), Florida Statutes.


  5. By Order dated June 28, 1994, the portion of Petitioner's rule challenge relating to Rule 40D-4.051(7) was dismissed. Petitioner appealed the Order to the Fifth District Court of Appeal, Gerald A. Robbins v. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Case No. 94-1717. The court denied Petitioner's Petition for Review of Non-Final Administrative Action by Order dated October 10, 1994.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  6. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this proceeding. Section 120.54, Florida Statutes.


  7. Section 120.54(4)(a), Florida Statutes, provides:


    Any substantially affected person may seek

    an administrative determination of the invalidity of any proposed rule on the ground that the proposed rule is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.


  8. Petitioner's request for relief as it relates to proposed Rule 40D- 4.051(1) is essentially a request to amend the subsection to include language concerning exemptions in Section 404.927, Florida Statutes. This is not a proper request pursuant to a challenge to a proposed rule. Petitioner's remedy is set forth in Section 120.54(5) which provides:


    Any person regulated by an agency or having a substantial interest in an agency rule may petition an agency to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule or provide the minimum public information required by

    s. 120.53. The petition shall specify the proposed rule and action requested. Not later than 30 calendar days after the date of filing a petition, the agency shall initiate rulemaking proceedings under this act, otherwise comply with the requested action, or deny the petition with a written state- ment of its reasons for the denial.


  9. Additionally, the Respondent's withdrawal of the proposed amendment to Rule 40D-4.051(1) renders the rule challenge moot. In State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Alice P., 367 So. 2d 1045, 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), the court held that an agency's withdrawal of the proposed rules which were challenged in a Section 120.54(4) proceeding rendered moot the issue of whether the proposed rules were an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority moot.


  10. There were no proposed changes to Rule 40D-4.051(7), Florida Statutes, and the notice of proposed rulemaking so indicated. Petitioner is challenging the wording of subsection (7) as it exists in the currently adopted rule. A challenge to the validity of Rule 40D-4.051(7) should be by a Section 120.56 proceeding rather than a Section 120.54(4) proceeding.

On the basis of all of the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and it is ORDERED:


That the Amended Petition to Challenge Proposed Rule 40D-4.051 is DISMISSED.


DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of June, 1995, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.



SUSAN B. KIRKLAND

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 30th day of June, 1995.


COPIES FURNISHED:


James A. Robinson, Esquire Southwest Florida Water

Management District 2379 Broad Street

Brooksville, Florida 34609-6899


Gerald A. Robbins

1026 Biltmore Drive, NW Winter Haven, Florida 33881


Peter G. Hubbel

Southwest Florida Water Management Executive Director

2379 Broad Street

Brooksville, Florida 34609-6899


Carroll Webb, Executive Director Administrative Procedures Committee Holland Building, Room 120 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1300


Liz Cloud, Chief

Bureau of Administrative Code The Capitol, Room 1802 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW


A party who is adversely affected by this Final Summary Order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review

proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the agency clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings and a second copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the District Court of Appeal in the appellate district where the agency maintains its headquarters of where the party resides. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.


Docket for Case No: 94-002720RP
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 14, 1997 (FLWAC) Agenda filed.
Jun. 30, 1995 CASE CLOSED. Summary Final Order sent out. (Motion filed)
Apr. 10, 1995 Notice of Hearing on Respondent`s motion to dismiss filed.
Apr. 07, 1995 Notice of Hearing on Respondent's Motion to Dismiss filed.
Apr. 05, 1995 (Respondent) Notice of Cancellation of Hearing w/cover letter filed.
Apr. 05, 1995 Notice of Cancellation of Hearing filed.
Mar. 30, 1995 Notice of Hearing On Respondent's Motion to Dismiss filed.
Mar. 27, 1995 Supplement to Petitioner's response to show cause order filed.
Mar. 09, 1995 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and Petitioner's Response to Order to Show Cause filed.
Feb. 24, 1995 Letter to SBK from G. Robbins (RE: status report) filed.
Feb. 21, 1995 Order to Show Cause sent out. (parties to respond by 3/6/95 as to why case should not be closed)
Feb. 13, 1995 Letter to HO from James A. Robinson re: Response to Order Requiring Status Report filed.
Feb. 13, 1995 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; Order Dismissing Proceeding (For HO Signature) w/cover letter filed.
Feb. 06, 1995 Order Requiring Status Report sent out. (parties to file status report by 2/20/95)
Dec. 01, 1994 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw sent out. (for petitioner)
Nov. 30, 1994 Petitioner's motion for Clarification of Order and Petition to enforce Mandate of this court, directed to Respondent, where Respondent was before this Court as Appellee/Defendant filed.
Nov. 22, 1994 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw (for HO signature); Cover Letter filed.
Nov. 17, 1994 (Petitioner) Order Granting Motion to Withdraw (for HO signature) filed.
Nov. 16, 1994 (Petitioner) Motion to Withdraw filed.
Aug. 19, 1994 Petitioner's reply to order to show cause filed.
Aug. 11, 1994 (Respondent) Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction and Response to Petitioner`s Motion to Stay Administrative Proceedings w/Exhibits A-D filed.
Aug. 10, 1994 Order Granting Stay sent out. (it is ordered that proceedings be stayed pending review of the petition for review of non-final administrative action filed in case no. 94-1717, fifth DCA)
Aug. 10, 1994 Case No/s 94-2719RP, 94-2720RP, 94-2721RP, 94-2722RP, 94-2929RP, 94-2930RP, 94-2933RP, 94-2934RP, 94-2935RP, 94-2936RP: unconsolidated.
Aug. 04, 1994 BY ORDER OF THE COURT filed.
Aug. 01, 1994 Acknowledgment of Petition to Review non-final agency action filed.
May 25, 1994 Prehearing Instructions and Order of Consolidation sent out. (Consolidated cases are: 94-2719RP, 94-2720RP & 94-2721RP)
May 20, 1994 Order of Assignment sent out.
May 20, 1994 (Petitioner) Amended Petition To Challenge Proposed Rule 40D-4.051 filed.
May 18, 1994 Letter to Liz Cloud & Carroll Webb from Marguerite Lockard w/cc: Agency General Counsel sent out.
May 13, 1994 Petition to Challenge Proposed Rule 40D-4.051 filed.
May 12, 1994 Petition to Challenge Proposed Rule 40D-4.051 filed.

Orders for Case No: 94-002720RP
Issue Date Document Summary
Jun. 30, 1995 DOAH Final Order Agency withdrew proposed amendments making rule challenge moot. Challenge to portion of rule unchanged by amendments should be 120.56 not 120.54.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer