STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
L. JAMES & COMPANY, INC., )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 95-5075CVL
) DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
FINAL ORDER
On October 12, 1995, Petitioner, T. L. James & Company, Inc., filed a Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing. The Petition and a Joint Stipulation were subsequently filed with the Division of Administrative Hearings. As the parties agreed there were no disputed issues of material fact, disposition of the cause shall be rendered based upon the stipulated facts without a formal hearing.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On November 22, 1989, T. L. James & Company, Inc. was convicted of conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition. This is a public entity crime.
T. L. James executed a Public Entity Crimes Affidavit on July 24, 1994. On the affidavit T. L. James disclosed the conviction.
Pursuant to Section 287.133, Florida Statutes, the Department of management Services (DMS) shall investigate public entity crimes to determine if the convicted company should be placed on the convicted vendors' list.
After receiving the affidavit from T. L. James, DMS conducted an investigation and discovered mitigating factors as defined and listed in Section 287.133, Florida Statutes. These factors are: payment of fines and damages totalling $600,000, cooperation with the officials criminally investigating and prosecuting the case, cooperation with DMS' investigation, instituting safeguards in the bid estimation process to prevent further irregularities, and providing full and accurate notice.
All other facts stipulated to by the parties pursuant to the Joint Stipulation previously filed in this case are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the parties to this case, pursuant to Section 120.57, Florida Statutes.
DMS is required by Section 287.133, Florida Statutes, to conduct investigations regarding public entity crimes. T. L. James committed a public entity crime as defined in Section 287.133, Florida Statutes. DMS completed an investigation of the public entity crime pursuant to this statute.
Chapter 287.133, Florida Statutes, requires that DMS place a vendor, convicted of a public entity crime, on the convicted vendors list unless the company has complied with the statutory mitigating factors. Placement on the convicted vendor's list forbids the company from doing business with the state.
T. L. James has complied with the mitigating factors. It is not in the public interest to place T. L. James on the convicted vendor list.
ORDER
Based upon the Findings of Fact adopted and the Conclusions of Law reached, it is
ORDERED:
That the petition shall be granted and the Department of Management Services shall not place T. L. James on the convicted vendors' list.
That the file in this case is closed.
DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of November, 1995, in Tallahassee, Florida.
JAMES W. YORK
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 15th day of November, 1995.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Emmet J. Bondurant, Esquire BONDURANT, MIXSON & ELMORE, LLP
3900 One Atlantic Center 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Cindy Horne, Esquire Staff Attorney
Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way, Suite 260
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950
William H. Lindner, Secretary Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW
A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS ARE GOVERNED BY THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. SUCH PROCEEDINGS ARE COMMENCED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF THE DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND A SECOND COPY, ACCOMPANIED BY FILING FEES PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, OR WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE PARTY RESIDES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Nov. 15, 1995 | CASE CLOSED. Final Order sent out. (facts stipulated) |
Nov. 02, 1995 | Notice of Intent to Adopt Respondent`s Proposed Final Order sent out. (parties shall have 10 days from the date of this Order to file any Objections or proposed revisions to the Respondent`s proposed final Order) |
Oct. 26, 1995 | (Respondent) Proposed Final Order filed. |
Oct. 19, 1995 | Order On Joint Stipulation sent out. |
Oct. 17, 1995 | Agency referral letter; Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing (&Exhibit A - 4-D); Joint Stipulation (& exhibit 1 - 4-D) filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Nov. 15, 1995 | DOAH Final Order | Petitioner has complied with statutory mitigating factors. It is not in the public interest to place petitioner on the convicted vendor list. |