Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs WILLIAM LLEDO; KEYS MARINE EQUIPMENT, INC.; AND MONROE COUNTY, 96-004868DRI (1996)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 96-004868DRI Visitors: 19
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
Respondent: WILLIAM LLEDO; KEYS MARINE EQUIPMENT, INC.; AND MONROE COUNTY
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Office of the Governor
Locations: Marathon, Florida
Filed: Oct. 16, 1996
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, June 10, 1997.

Latest Update: Sep. 12, 1997
Summary: Whether Building permit no. 93-2-4072 issued to Respondents William Lledo, Owner, and Key Marine Equipment, Inc., General Contractor by Monroe County violated Monroe County Comprehensive Plan provisions and Land Development Regulations. Building permit was not consistent with local code.
96-4868

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 96-4868DRI

) WILLIAM LLEDO, Owner; KEY MARINE ) EQUIPMENT, INC., GENERAL ) CONTRACTOR; and MONROE COUNTY, a )

political subdivision of the ) State of Florida, )

)

Respondents. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Administrative Law Judge, Susan B. Kirkland, held a formal hearing in this case on June 2, 1997, in Marathon, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Christine C. Stretesky

Assistant General Counsel Department of Community Affairs 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212

Marathon, Florida 33050


For Respondent William Lledo: No Appearance For Respondent Key Marine Equipment: No Appearance For Respondent Monroe County: No Appearance

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES


Whether Building permit no. 93-2-4072 issued to Respondents William Lledo, Owner, and Key Marine Equipment, Inc., General Contractor by Monroe County violated Monroe County Comprehensive Plan provisions and Land Development Regulations.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


On April 26, 1993, Monroe County issued Building Permit No. 93-2-4072 to Owner William Lledo and General Contractor Key Marine Equipment, Inc., for development of a seawall with 33 cubic yards of fill along the entire length of shoreline of Lot 37, Sombrero Anglers Club Subdivision, Boot Key, Monroe County, Florida. On June 11, 1993, the Department of Community Affairs filed a Notice of Appeal of the development order to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. On September 27, 1996, the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission gave notice that it would forward the appeal to the Division of Administrative Hearings for assignment to an Administrative Law Judge. On October 16, 1996, the Division of Administrative Hearings received the appeal.

The final hearing was scheduled for January 29, 1997. On January 22, 1997, Petitioner filed a Joint Motion for Abeyance, representing that Respondent, William Lledo, requested that the case be held in abeyance while he attempted to sell the lot. The

request was granted and the case was held in abeyance until March 31, 1997, when the case was rescheduled for hearing on June 2, 1997.

At the final hearing none of the Respondents appeared. Petitioner entered Petitioner’s Exhibits 1, 2, and 3A-3D in evidence. Petitioner called Kathleen Edgerton as its witness.

The transcript was filed on June 6, 1997. Petitioner filed its proposed recommended order on June 6, 1997.

FINDINGS OF FACTS


  1. On April 28, 1996, Petitioner, Department of Community Affairs (Department), received Monroe County Permit 93-2-4072 issued to Respondents, William Lledo (Lledo) and Key Marine Equipment, Inc., to construct a seawall with a five-foot wide cap which would serve as a docking facility.

  2. The project is proposed to be constructed on an undeveloped piece of real property owned by Lledo. The property is known as Lot 37, Sombrero Anglers Club South Subdivision, Boot Key, Monroe County, Florida. The property is located within the Keys Area of Critical State Concern.

  3. The proposed seawall/dock will not be supported by pilings or other supports and will not act to stabilize a disturbed shoreline. The shoreline at the subject property is not eroding. An eroding shoreline shows signs of the water undercutting the shoreline and contains no vegetation on the

    shoreline and submerged shelf. The subject property’s shoreline and adjacent submerged shelf are vegetated.

  4. The project will not be replacing a deteriorating seawall or bulkhead.

  5. The project, as proposed, requires the placement of fill in a manmade canal below the mean high water line.

  6. No principal use or structure has been established on the property nor is there any plan to construct a principal use on the property.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  7. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this proceeding. Sections 120.57(1) and 380.07, Florida Statutes.

  8. The Department has the burden to establish that the building permit issued by Respondent Monroe County is not in accordance with Monroe County’s Land Development Regulations and its comprehensive plan as required by Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Young v. Department of Community Affairs, 625 So.2d 831 (Fla. 1993).

  9. The Florida Legislature has designated the Florida Keys as an Area of Critical State Concern. Section 380.0552, Florida Statutes. The legislation has “statutorily determined that development in the Florida Keys will have an adverse impact if not in accordance with Chapter 380, the local development regulations, and the local comprehensive plan.” Young at 834.

  10. Monroe County is required by Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, to permit only those developments which are consistent with its comprehensive plan and land regulations. Sections 163.3161(5), 163.3194(1), and 163.3213(1), Florida Statutes.

  11. The proposed project will not meet the criteria of Section 9.5-345(m), Monroe County Code, which provides:

    1. All structures on any submerged lands and mangroves shall be designed, located and constructed such that:

      1. All structures shall be constructed on pilings or other supports;

      2. Bulkheads and seawalls shall be permitted only to stabilize disturbed shorelines or to replace deteriorated existing bulkheads or seawalls;

        * * * *

        (4) No fill shall be permitted in any manmade water body unless the applicant demonstrates that the activity will not have a significant adverse impact on natural marine communities. . . .


  12. The seawall will not be constructed on pilings or other supports. The seawall will not be stabilizing a disturbed shoreline and will not be replacing a deteriorated existing seawall.

  13. Section 9.5-4(A-2), Monroe County Code, defines “accessory use or accessory structures” as uses or structures that serve a principal use or structure, and provides that “in no event shall an accessory use be established prior to the principal use to which it is accessory.”

  14. There is no principal use or structure on the Lledo property. The proposed seawall is an accessory use or structure serving no principal use or structure; thus, the project is in violation of Section 9.5-4(A-2), Monroe County Code.

  15. Section 9.5-288, Monroe County Code, allows the construction of a seawall or similar shoreline stabilization structure as a principal use where it is demonstrated that the purpose is for erosion protection or upland protection. The project would not be for erosion protection because the Lledo property is not eroding.

  16. The building permit is not in compliance with Sections 9.5-288 and 9.5345(m)(2) and (4), and 9.5-4(A-2) Monroe County Land Development Regulations. Therefore the permit was not issued consistent with the provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes.

Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that a Final Order be entered denying Monroe County Permit No. 93-2-4072.

DONE AND ENTERED in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this 10th day of June, 1997.



SUSAN B. KIRKLAND

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(904) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (904) 921-6847


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 10th day of June, 1997.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Christine C. Stretesky Assistant General Counsel Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100


Key Marine Equipment, Inc.

c/o L.E. Brown, Registered Agent 2001 Overseas Highway

Marathon, Florida 33050


Mr. William Lledo

8730 Southwest 116th Street Miami, Florida 33176


Robert Herman, Director Monroe County Growth

Management Division

Marathon Regional Service Center 2798 Overseas Highway, Suite 400

Marathon, Florida 33050-2227


James F. Murley, Secretary Department of Community Affairs

2555 Shummard Oak Boulevard, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100

Stephanie M. Gehres, General Counsel Department of Community Affairs

2555 Shummard Oak Boulevard, Suite 325-A Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100


Carolyn Dekle, Director

South Florida Regional Planning Council 3400 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140

Hollywood, Florida 33021


Robert B. Bradley, Secretary c/o Barbara Leighty, Clerk

Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission Growth Management and Strategic Planning

2105 Capitol

Tallahassee, Florida 32399


Gregory Smith, Esquire

Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission

209 Capitol

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 96-004868DRI
Issue Date Proceedings
Sep. 12, 1997 Final Order filed.
Jun. 10, 1997 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 06/02/97.
Jun. 06, 1997 Transcript of Proceedings filed.
Jun. 06, 1997 Petitioner Department of Community Affairs Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 02, 1997 CASE STATUS: Hearing held.
May 30, 1997 (Petitioner) Notice of Receipt of Answers to Request for Admissions and First Set of Interrogatories (filed via facsimile).
May 19, 1997 Petitioner, Department of Community Affairs` Prehearing Statement (filed via facsimile).
Apr. 25, 1997 Petitioner Department of Community Affairs Notice and Certificate of Service of Its First Request for Admissions filed.
Apr. 25, 1997 Petitioner Department of Community Affairs Notice and Certificate of Service of Its First Set of Interrogatories to Respondent William Lledo filed.
Apr. 21, 1997 Notice of Substitution of Counsel for Department of Community Affairs filed.
Mar. 31, 1997 Second Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for June 2, 1997; 9:00 a.m.; Marathon)
Mar. 21, 1997 (Petitioner) Status Report filed.
Jan. 23, 1997 Order Cancelling Hearing and Placing Case in Abeyance sent out. (Parties to file status report by 3/24/97)
Jan. 22, 1997 Joint Motion for Abeyance filed.
Nov. 13, 1996 Order of Prehearing Instructions sent out.
Nov. 13, 1996 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 1/29/97; 9:00am; Marathon)
Nov. 06, 1996 (Petitioner) Response filed.
Nov. 06, 1996 (From K. Brodeen) Notice of Substitution of Counsel for Department of Community Affairs filed.
Oct. 22, 1996 Initial Order issued.
Oct. 16, 1996 Agency referral letter; Notice of Appeal; Department of Community Affairs` Petition for Appeal of Development Order; Notice of Substitution of Counsel for Department of Community Affairs; Notice; Supportive Letters & Documents rec` d.

Orders for Case No: 96-004868DRI
Issue Date Document Summary
Aug. 29, 1997 Agency Final Order
Jun. 10, 1997 Recommended Order Building permit was not consistent with local code.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer