Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOARD OF MASSAGE vs KEITH RICHARD GOLDSMITH, 98-000989 (1998)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 98-000989 Visitors: 13
Petitioner: BOARD OF MASSAGE
Respondent: KEITH RICHARD GOLDSMITH
Judges: MARY CLARK
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Mar. 02, 1998
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, July 20, 1998.

Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2004
Summary: An administrative complaint dated January 5, 1998, charges that Respondent violated rules governing the practice of massage by failing to have a current establishment license and failing to have a fire extinquisher on the premises maintained in good working condition. The issues for resolution are whether those violations occurred and, if so, what discipline is appropriate.Massage therapist failed to get his establishment re-licensed when he moved to a different site, and failed to unpack his fi
More
98-0989.PDF


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF ) MASSAGE, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 98-0989

)

KEITH RICHARD GOLDSMITH, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Administrative Law Judge, Mary Clark, held a formal hearing in the above-styled case on June 11, 1998. The hearing was conducted by videoconference with the Administrative Law Judge presiding from Tallahassee, Florida. Counsel for the Petitioner participated from Tallahassee; the Respondent, witness for Petitioner, and court reporter participated from

Orlando, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Joseph S. Garwood, Esquire

Agency for Health Care Administration 1580 Waldo Palmer Lane

Post Office Box 14229 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229


For Respondent: Keith Richard Goldsmith, pro se

265 Stoner Road



Winter Springs, Florida 32708



STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES


An administrative complaint dated January 5, 1998, charges that Respondent violated rules governing the practice of massage by failing to have a current establishment license and failing to have a fire extinquisher on the premises maintained in good working condition.

The issues for resolution are whether those violations occurred and, if so, what discipline is appropriate.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


Respondent disputed the allegations of the administrative complaint and requested a formal evidentiary hearing. After the agency referred the case to the Division of Administrative Hearings, it was assigned and the hearing was set as described above.

At the hearing Petitioner presented the testimony of its investigator, Dawn Witte, and admitted a single exhibit

(a composite containing the licensing file) into evidence, without objection.

Respondent testified in his own behalf and also admitted, without objection, a single exhibit comprised of an application and a temporary authorization.



Several days after the hearing the court reporter informed the parties and the administrative law judge that she had lost her tape recording of the proceedings. In a telephone conference convened on June 16, 1998, the parties agreed to allow the matter to proceed without a transcript. The material facts are uncontroverted.

On June 17, 1998, Petitioner filed its Proposed Recommended Order. Although Respondent mentioned that he had faxed some post-hearing written material, including a "poem," those documents were never received by the administrative law judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Respondent, Keith Richard Goldsmith, is now and has been at all relevant times a massage therapist licensed by the State of Florida with license no. 0011202.

  2. In 1996, Respondent's massage establishment, Bio-Spirit Bodywork Therapy, was licensed and located at 1089 Choke Cherry Road in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The property was sold and Respondent had to relocate in a move which he describes as "chaotic."

  3. At some point during or after the move Respondent sent his facility transfer fee to the Board of Massage. He apparently sent a letter, but not the proper application form.



  4. On July 31, 1997, after obtaining Respondent's phone number from telephone information and calling to get an appointment, investigators Dawn Witte and J. C. Russell conducted an inspection of Respondent's facility now located at 265 Stoner Road in Winter Springs, Florida. The inspection determined that all requirements were met, except for the following:

    1. No current establishment license;

    2. No establishment license displayed; and

    3. No fire extinquisher maintained on the premises.


  5. At the time of the inspection Respondent had not obtained the license for the new facility and did not display the license for the prior facility. His fire extinquisher was still packed away somewhere.

  6. In a follow-up visit from the inspectors, Respondent declined the option to accept a disciplinary citation and $250 fine for the violations.

  7. Respondent subsequently formally applied for, and was granted a temporary establishment license for the Stoner Road facility.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW



  8. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction in this proceeding pursuant to Sections 120.57(1), Florida Statutes; and 455.225, Florida Statutes.

  9. Section 480.046(1)(k), Florida Statutes, provides that disciplinary action may be taken against a massage therapist or massage establishment for violating a rule of the Board of Massage Therapy or Department of Health.

  10. Rule 63B7-26.003, Florida Administrative Code, requires that each massage establishment must maintain a fire extinquisher in good working order. Rule 64B7-28.008, Florida Administrative Code, requires that an establishment owner conspicuously display a current establishment license on the premises.

  11. The agency plainly proved that the alleged violations occurred. Moreover, Respondent concedes that he did not have the license displayed for his new facility or the fire extinquisher unpacked and ready.

  12. Rule 64B7-30.002, Florida Administrative Code, provides disciplinary guidelines for the Board of Massage Therapy. For violations of Section 480.046(1)(k), Florida Statutes, the rule recommends a penalty of "$250 fine to probation." Although there are two violations alleged and proven, the mitigating factors described in Rule 64B7-30.002(3), Florida Administrative Code, suggest some lessor penalty than the $500 fine.



RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing it is hereby recommended that the Board of Massage Therapy enter its final order finding that Respondent committed two violations of Section 480.046(1)(k), Florida Statutes, and assessing a fine of $350.



DONE AND ENTERED this 20th day of July, 1998, in Tallahassee. Leon County, Florida.


MARY CLARK

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 20th day of July, 1998.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Joseph S. Garwood, Esquire

Agency for Health Care Administration 1580 Waldo Palmer Lane

Post Office Box 14229 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229


Keith Richard Goldsmith

265 Stoner Road

Winter Springs, Florida 32708


Joe Baker, Executive Director Board of Massage Therapy Department of Business and

Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792


Linda Goodgame, General Counsel Department of Business

and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-4092



NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 98-000989
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 06, 2004 Final Order filed.
Jul. 24, 1998 Petitioner`s Motion to Increase Penalty filed.
Jul. 20, 1998 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 06/11/98.
Jun. 30, 1998 Exhibits filed.
Jun. 19, 1998 Letter to Judge Clark from Sophie Springer (RE: Request for guidance) (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 17, 1998 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jun. 11, 1998 Video Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Jun. 09, 1998 Petitioner`s Motion for Relief From Prehearing Stipulation Requirements filed.
May 20, 1998 (J. Garwood) Notice of Unavailability filed.
Apr. 20, 1998 Amended Notice of Video Hearing as to Locations sent out. (Video Final Hearing set for 6/11/98; 1:00pm; Orlando & Tallahassee)
Apr. 13, 1998 Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel (Petitioner) filed.
Mar. 18, 1998 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 6/11/98; 1:00pm; Orlando)
Mar. 18, 1998 Prehearing Order sent out.
Mar. 13, 1998 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Mar. 05, 1998 Initial Order issued.
Mar. 02, 1998 Agency Referral letter; Administrative Complaint; Election of Rights filed.

Orders for Case No: 98-000989
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 14, 1998 Agency Final Order
Jul. 20, 1998 Recommended Order Massage therapist failed to get his establishment re-licensed when he moved to a different site, and failed to unpack his fire extinguisher after the move. Fine of $350.00 recommended.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer