Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs BOBBIE J. MANNING, 98-003677 (1998)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 98-003677 Visitors: 20
Petitioner: DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
Respondent: BOBBIE J. MANNING
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Aug. 13, 1998
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, January 27, 1999.

Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2004
Summary: The issue in the case is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are true, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Exchange of betting tickets without receipt of cash violates rule; merits revocation of cardroom license.
98-3677.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ) PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION ) OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 98-3677

)

BOBBIE J. MANNING, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


On December 15, 1998, a formal administrative hearing in this case was held in Tampa, Florida, before William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings. The hearing was conducted by videoconference from Tallahassee, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Susan C. Felker-Little, Esquire

Department of Business

and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007


For Respondent: No appearance


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue in the case is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are true, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

By Administrative Complaint dated July 1, 1998, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering (Petitioner) alleges that Bobbie J. Manning (Respondent) allowed a patron at Tampa Jai-Alai to obtain betting tickets without paying for them, a violation of the Petitioner’s Administrative Rules. The Respondent disputed the allegations and requested a formal administrative hearing. The Petitioner forwarded the matter to the Division of Administrative Hearings, which scheduled and conducted the hearing.

At the hearing, the Petitioner presented the testimony of two witnesses and had one exhibit admitted into evidence. The Respondent presented no witnesses and did not appear at the hearing.

No hearing transcript was filed. The Petitioner filed a Proposed Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. The Petitioner is the agency charged with regulating the pari-mutuel wagering industry in Florida, including persons licensed under Chapter 550, Florida Statutes.

  2. At all times material to this case, the Respondent was licensed as a cardroom employee occupational license number 1395921-1181, issued by the Petitioner.

  3. On May 20, 1998, the Respondent was working as a teller in the cardroom at Tampa Jai-Alai.

  4. The evidence establishes that on May 20, 1998, the

    Respondent provided wagering tickets to a patron of the facility without obtaining cash or a cash voucher in exchange for the tickets.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  5. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this proceeding. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  6. The Petitioner has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the allegations against the Respondent. Ferris v. Turlington, 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987). In this case, the burden has been met.

  7. Rule 61D-7.020(5)(b), Florida Administrative Code, requires that all pari-mutuel wagering ticket sales be for cash or cash equivalent. A cash equivalent includes a cash voucher.

  8. The evidence in this case establishes that on May 20, 1998, the Respondent provided wagering tickets without obtaining cash or a cash equivalent, such as a voucher, in exchange for the tickets.

  9. Rule 61D-7.020(6), Florida Administrative Code, provides that the "duty of the licensed pari-mutuel tellers shall not be compromised . . . ." The provision of wagering tickets to a patron without the receipt of payment compromises the duties of the teller.

  10. Rule 61D-7.020(6), Florida Administrative Code, also provides that the teller ". . . shall not at any time serve as an agent or an employee of a patron with respect to pari-mutuel wagering . . . ." The Petitioner asserts that the Respondent has likewise violated this section of the rule; however, the evidence

is insufficient to establish the reason for the Respondent’s

actions and fails to indicate that she was employed by or an agent of the patron to whom she provided the tickets.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is recommended that the Department of Business and Professional Regulation enter a Final Order revoking the cardroom employee license number 1395921-1181 of Bobbie J. Manning.

DONE AND ENTERED this 27th day of January, 1999, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 27th day of January, 1999.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Susan C. Felker-Little, Esquire Department of Business and

Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0750


Bobbie J. Manning 3007 Spillers Avenue

Tampa, Florida 33619


Deborah R. Miller, Director Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering Department of Business and

Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792


Lynda L. Goodgame, General Counsel Department of Business and

Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order must be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 98-003677
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 15, 2004 Final Order filed.
Jan. 27, 1999 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 12/15/98.
Dec. 22, 1998 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 15, 1998 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Dec. 04, 1998 Order Denying sent out. (motion for continuance is denied)
Dec. 04, 1998 (Joint) Prehearing Stipulation (filed via facsimile).
Nov. 23, 1998 Notice of Receipt of Response to Request for Admissions, Filing of Respondent`s Untimely Response to Request for Admissions, Motion to Withdraw Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction, Motion for Continuance ect..filed.
Nov. 10, 1998 (Petitioner) Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed via facsimile).
Nov. 10, 1998 (Petitioner) Motion for Expedited Hearing on Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 14, 1998 Notice of Video Hearing sent out. (Video Hearing set for 12/15/98; 9:00am; Tampa & Tallahassee)
Oct. 14, 1998 Order Establishing Prehearing Procedure sent out.
Oct. 02, 1998 Notice of Service of Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories; Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions; Petitioner`s First Request for Production of Documents filed.
Sep. 11, 1998 (Petitioner) Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 20, 1998 Initial Order issued.
Aug. 13, 1998 Agency Referral letter; Administrative Complaint; Election of Rights; Explanation of Rights filed.

Orders for Case No: 98-003677
Issue Date Document Summary
Feb. 24, 1999 Agency Final Order
Jan. 27, 1999 Recommended Order Exchange of betting tickets without receipt of cash violates rule; merits revocation of cardroom license.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer