Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHRISTIAN P. WELVAERT vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF LAND, 02-001282 (2002)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 02-001282 Visitors: 23
Petitioner: CHRISTIAN P. WELVAERT
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF LAND
Judges: FLORENCE SNYDER RIVAS
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Mar. 28, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, November 4, 2002.

Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2002
Summary: Whether the Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Land Sales, Condominiums, and Mobile Homes (Respondent or Division), acted arbitrarily or capriciously in denying Christian Welvaert’s (Petitioner or Welvaert) application to be licensed as a yacht and ship salesmen under Chapter 326, Florida Statutes.Petitioner`s failure to disclose criminal background warrants denial of license as a yacht salesman.
02-1282.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


CHRISTIAN P. WELVAERT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 02-1282

)

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )

PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ) DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, ) CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES, )

)

Respondent. )

______ )


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was held in this case on September 10, 2002, by videoteleconference at sites in West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, Florida, before Administrative Law Judge Florence Snyder Rivas.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Christian P. Welvaert, pro se

7 Kenmore Lane

Boynton Beach, Florida 33435


For Respondent: Joseph S. Garwood, Esquire

Department of Business and Professional Regulation

1940 North Monroe Street, Suite 60

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

Whether the Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Land Sales, Condominiums,

and Mobile Homes (Respondent or Division), acted arbitrarily or capriciously in denying Christian Welvaert’s (Petitioner or Welvaert) application to be licensed as a yacht and ship salesmen under Chapter 326, Florida Statutes.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


On January 11, 2002, Respondent filed a Notice of Intent to Deny License Application (Notice) on the grounds that Petitioner did not furnish proof satisfactory to the Division that he is of good moral character. More specifically, the Notice stated that Petitioner had not fully revealed his criminal history as required by law in submitting his application for licensure.

Petitioner timely asserted his right to an administrative hearing in a hand-written document in which he stated, "Please give me a chance to explain."

The Division moved to dismiss the petition asserting that the request was untimely, and did not adequately specify the disputed material facts. The motion was denied without prejudice, and a final hearing was scheduled for June 12, 2002. Thereafter, Petitioner advised that he would be "away for the summer." He provided no details and did not supply a current address or telephone number.

In preparation for the final hearing, the Division propounded a Request for Admissions. Welvaert failed to timely reply, and he failed to seek an enlargement of time. The

Request for Admissions addressed all the material allegations of the Notice, and the Division moved for entry of an order deeming the allegations to be admitted. This too was denied without prejudice, so as to provide Petitioner, who was acting pro se, an opportunity to have his case heard on the merits.

Over the Division's objection, the hearing went forward on September 10, 2002. At that time, Petitioner presented his own testimony. Respondent presented the testimony of its investigator James Courchaine, and introduced four exhibits, all of which were entered into evidence.

The transcript of the proceedings was filed on September 17, 2002.

Petitioner has not filed a proposed recommended order.


Respondent filed a Proposed Recommended Order on September 23, 2002, which has been considered in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Respondent is the state agency charged with regulating and licensing of yacht and ship brokers under Section 326.002(2), Florida Statutes.

  2. On October 16, 2001, Welvaert submitted to the Division his application for licensure as a yacht and ship salesman.

  3. Licensure is a privilege granted to individuals who affirmatively demonstrate good moral character. The Division is

    authorized to, and does in fact investigate an applicant's criminal background if one exists. This is done so that the state may determine if the individual's criminal history is of a nature which would warrant denial of licensure.

  4. To facilitate the state's investigation, applicants are asked to fully disclose any criminal history. It is required that this question, and all the questions on the application, be answered truthfully.

  5. Welvaert falsely stated on his application that his only criminal background was "traffic offense."

  6. A Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) background check revealed that Welvaert had been arrested on several occasions on charges relating to possession of drugs and drug paraphernalia; domestic battery and resisting an officer without violence; probation violation by possessing drug paraphernalia and cannabis; and driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

  7. Welvaert did not offer any evidence to contradict the FDLE's findings in any material way. He asserted that he never violated probation, claiming that he didn’t know when his court date was because he had moved.

  8. This experience did not teach Welvaert the importance of attending to his legal affairs. In this case, he blamed his landlady for his failure to respond to the Division's Request

    for Admissions, which was properly served upon him at the address he had on file in this case. Welvaert stated, "I thought the person, the landlady I was staying with, I thought she was going to call me or tell me if I had something this important in the mail. I guess she didn't."

  9. Petitioner testified that he has "changed his life around" and is now rehabilitated. While he did not unequivocally deny the drug charges, he implied that he "just [took] the time" on the advice of the presiding judge. He further stated, "It was at someone's house. I was in a college town at the time."

  10. Nothing in Welvaert's testimony constitutes a legally or factually sufficient excuse for his failure to disclose his criminal background.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  11. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this proceeding, pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  12. In this proceeding, Petitioner had the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to a license pursuant to Rule 28-107.003, Florida Administrative Code. Department of Business & Professional Regulation,

    Division of Securities & Investor Protection v. Osborne Stern & Co., 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996).

  13. This he has failed to do. Section 326.004(6)(a), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Division to deny a license to an applicant who does not furnish satisfactory proof of good moral character. A key component of good moral character is that an applicant truthfully report his criminal history in order to facilitate the Division's efforts to determine whether the applicant has been sufficiently rehabilitated so as to be granted the privilege of licensure.

  14. Rule 61B-60.003(3)(a), Florida Administrative Code, reasonably mandates that the applicant provide full and complete disclosure, as well as accurate information, concerning any criminal background on the application for licensure.

  15. Although not required to, the Division advises applicants on the face of the application that the Division will independently research and confirm the representations made on the application with respect to criminal history. No reasonable person could have been confused as to the requirements of the law.

  16. The procedural history of this case as set forth in the preliminary statement reveals that Welvaert seeks second chances in the form of probation in criminal matters and, in this case, an impartial review of a predicament for which he

    alone is responsible, yet cannot be troubled to provide address changes to the authorities whose indulgence he seeks.

  17. Yacht salesmen deal with huge sums of money in an industry which is vital to Florida's economy. The state has a legitimate interest in assuring that individuals who work in this industry are people of integrity and character. The record in this case establishes that Welvaert is dishonest and immature. The Division was well justified in denying his application for licensure.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Petitioner's application to be licensed as a yacht and ship salesman’s be denied.

DONE AND ENTERED this 4th day of November, 2002, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


FLORENCE SNYDER RIVAS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 4th day of November, 2002.

COPIES FURNISHED:


Joseph S. Garwood, Esquire Department of Business and Professional Regulation

1940 North Monroe Street, Suite 60

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202


Christian P. Welvaert

7 Kenmore Lane

Boynton Beach, Florida 33435


Ross Fleetwood, Division Director Division of Florida Land Sales,

Condominiums and Mobile Homes Department of Business and

Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792


Hardy L. Roberts, III, General Counsel Department of Business and

Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 02-001282
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 30, 2002 Final Order filed.
Nov. 04, 2002 Recommended Order issued (hearing held September 10, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 04, 2002 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Sep. 25, 2002 Letter to Judge Rivas from J. Garwood requesting enclosed revisions be accepted to proposed recommended order filed.
Sep. 23, 2002 Transcript filed.
Sep. 23, 2002 Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Sep. 23, 2002 Transcript filed.
Sep. 17, 2002 Transcript filed.
Sep. 10, 2002 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Sep. 06, 2002 Respondent`s Emergency Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 05, 2002 Respondent`s Fourth Motion to Dismiss (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 12, 2002 Order to Show Cause issued (Petitioner shall show cause in writing on or before September 3, 2002, as to why Respondent`s motion should not be granted).
Aug. 08, 2002 Respondent`s Motion to Have Admissions Deemed Admitted by Operation of Law or to Compel Answers filed.
Jun. 17, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
Jun. 17, 2002 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for September 10, 2002; 9:30 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL).
Jun. 13, 2002 Proposed Order of Dismissal (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Jun. 05, 2002 Order on Respondent`s Second and Third Motions to Dismiss issued.
Jun. 04, 2002 Respondent`s Third Motion to Dismiss (filed via facsimile).
May 22, 2002 Respondent`s First Request for Admissions filed.
May 22, 2002 Respondent`s Motion to Shorten Time for Answering Admissions filed.
May 20, 2002 Respondent`s Second Motion to Dismiss (filed via facsimile).
May 17, 2002 Notice of Unavailability filed by Respondent.
May 15, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
May 15, 2002 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference issued (video hearing set for June 12, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, FL).
May 10, 2002 Order Denying Motion to Dismiss issued.
Apr. 23, 2002 Response to Initial Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Apr. 03, 2002 Respondent`s Motion to Dismiss filed.
Mar. 28, 2002 Notice of Intent to Deny License Application filed.
Mar. 28, 2002 Request for Hearing filed.
Mar. 28, 2002 Agency referral filed.
Mar. 28, 2002 Initial Order issued.

Orders for Case No: 02-001282
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 24, 2002 Agency Final Order
Nov. 04, 2002 Recommended Order Petitioner`s failure to disclose criminal background warrants denial of license as a yacht salesman.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer