Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs MODEL 2000, INC., 02-002988 (2002)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 02-002988 Visitors: 92
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Respondent: MODEL 2000, INC.
Judges: FRED L. BUCKINE
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Jul. 29, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, January 10, 2003.

Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2005
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent, Model 2000, Inc., a talent agency, violated Sections 468.402(1)(d), 468.402(1)(e), 468.402(1)(s), 468.402(t), 468.410(2), 468.410(3), 468.412(6) and 468.413(2)(e), Florida Statutes, through solicitation, fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, false promises, false pretenses, exploitation, trick, scheme, or device, exercise of undue influence, requiring photography services as a prerequisite condition of employment, and failure to provide contracts of representati
More
UY Or» Final Order No. BPR-2003-01644 Date: Y, FILED 5 24 "03 ae a Department of Business and Professional Regulation : ~*- rd Sy AGENCY CLERK Sarah Wachman, Agency C erk Letadh. tr Thich STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION aan DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND __ ) PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ) ) Petitioner, ) yy ) DOAH Cases Nos. 02-2982 ' Lb- Rabe v. ) through 02-2996 ) MODEL 2000, INC., ) ) Respondent. ) ) FINAL ORDER The Secretary of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (Department) enters this Final Order in the above referenced matter. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The Department charged Model 2000, Inc. (Nancy Sniffen) in 15 separate Administrative Complaints with violating chapter 468, part VII, Florida Statutes, the Talent Agencies law. The Department charged Sniffen with multiple violations of sections 468.402(1)(d), 468.402(1)(e), 468.402(1)(s), 468.402(1)(t), 468.410(2), 468.410(3), 468.412(6), and 468.413(2)(e), Florida Statutes. The Administrative Complaints advised Sniffen that the agency could impose one or more of the following penalties: revocation or suspension of Sniffen’s license, imposition of an administrative fine not exceeding $5,000 for each count or separate offense, restitution, issuance of a public reprimand, assessment of costs associated with the investigation, probation, and/or any Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. Page 1 of 5 Model 2000, inc., DOAH Cases Nos. 02-2982 through 02-2996 other relief appropriate. Sniffen timely requested a hearing under sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. The procedural history of the proceedings before the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) are set out by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in the Recommended Order, which is adopted in full and incorporated in this Final Order. The Recommended Order is attached as exhibit A. On January 10, 2003, the ALJ recommended that the Department enter a final order: 1) dismissing four Administrative Complaints; 2) finding Model 2000 in violation of sections 468.413(2), (3), and (4), Florida Statutes; 3) requiring Model 2000 (Sniffen) to pay restitution to 11 complainants; 4) imposing of a fine of $11,000; and 5) permanently revoking Model 2000's (Sniffen) Talent Agency license. The ALJ also recommended that the Department pursue judicial sanctions available in section 468.413(4), Florida Statutes, if Model 2000 (Sniffen) does not immediately pay the restitution and fines ordered. [Ex. A: Recommended Order at 17-18] Neither party filed exceptions to the Recommended Order. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Division adopts and incorporates by reference the Findings of Fact set forth in the Recommended Order. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 2. The Division adopts and incorporates by reference the Conclusions of Law set forth in the Recommended Order. Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. Page 2 of 5 Mode! 2000, Inc., DOAH Cases Nos. 02-2982 through 02-2996 3. The Secretary, after reviewing the transcript and the entire record, finds that the ALJ miscalculated the amount paid by Robert Mikolajezak. According to the transcript, Mr. Mikolajczak paid $347.10, not $347.00. [Transcript at 116, 118, Petitioner's Exhibit 02-2990] The agency has adjusted the amount of restitution awarded accordingly. ORDER Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is ORDERED: 1. The Administrative Complaints for Bilan Evans, DOAH case no. 02- 2986, BPR case no. 02-01766; Louis Kribs, DOAH case no. 02-2987, BPR case no. 02-00952; John Greene, DOAH case no. 02-2989, BPR case no. 00-01741: and Patricia Van Sant Meyer, DOAH case no. 02-2991, BPR case no. 02-00503 are DISMISSED; 2. Respondent shall make restitution in the amounts stated to the complainants below within 60 days: Case No. Complainants Amount DOAH 02-2982 Spencer Borisoff $934.07 DOAH 02-2983 Tom Stanton $855.00 DOAH 02-2984 Athena Lopez $466.94 DOAH 02-2985 Lisa Menuto $693.02 DOAH 02-2988 Gina Hughes $1,040.82 DOAH 02-2990 Robert Mikolajczak $347.10 DOAH 02-2992 Aaliyah Womack $603.92 DOAH 02-2993 Charlene Mars $261.15 DOAH 02-2994 Irma Avery $774.90 DOAH 02-2995 Nelita Parris $150.00 DOAH 02-2996 Christy West $855.00 Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. Mode! 2000, Inc., DOAH Cases Nos. 02-2982 through 02-2996 Page 3 of 5 3. Respondent shall pay a fine of $11,000 (Eleven Thousand Dollars and No Cents), which shall be payable to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Northwood Centre, 1940 North Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0750 within 30 calendar days of the effective date of this order, which is the date of filing with the Agency Clerk; 4. Respondent's Talent Agency License No. TA0000618 is permanently REVOKED; and 5. Should Respondent fail to timely comply with full payment of the restitution and fine ordered, the Department shall pursue judicial sanctions as provided in sections 468.413(2) and 468.413(4), Florida Statutes. DONE and ORDERED in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this 2 7 ? day ofA 2003. 2002-01767 2002-00807 2000-03275 2002-01766 2000-09392 Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. 2002-01194 2002-00920 2002-00952 2000-01741 2002-01205 2001-03661 2002-00503 2002-00041 2002-01510 2002-00019 Chang. Cer DIANE CARR, SECRETARY Department of Business and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0750 Page 4 of 5 Model 2000, Inc., DOAH Cases Nos. 02-2982 through 02-2996 NOTICE OF RIGHT OF APPEAL THIS FINAL ORDER CONSTITUTES FINAL AGENCY ACTION AND MAY BE APPEALED BY ANY PARTY SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND RULE 9.110, FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, BY FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 9.110(d), FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, BOTH WITH THE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, ACCOMPANIED BY THE APPROPRIATE FILING FEE, AND WITH THE AGENCY CLERK, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, AT 1940 NORTH MONROE STREET, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-1007 WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE RENDITION OF THIS ORDER. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Certified Mail to Nancy Sniffen, President, Model 2000, : s 2a Inc., 4852 West Gandy Bivd., Tampa, Florida 33611, this day of May » 2008, re } . / W - ff" SARAH WACHMAN, Agency Clerk Copies furnished to: Division of Administrative Hearings Gail Scott-Hill, Esq., Office of the General Counsel Charles Tunnicliff, Esq., Office of the General Counsel Julie Malone, Executive Director Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. Page 5 of 5 Model 2000, Inc., DOAH Cases Nos. 02-2982 through 02-2996

Docket for Case No: 02-002988
Issue Date Proceedings
Feb. 15, 2005 Petitioner`s Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Jun. 02, 2003 Final Order filed.
Jan. 27, 2003 Suggestion of the Pendency of Bankruptcy Proceedings filed by H. Muslin.
Jan. 10, 2003 Recommended Order issued (hearing held October 23-24, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
Jan. 10, 2003 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Jan. 03, 2003 Addendum to Petitioner`s Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 17, 2002 Notice of Scrivener`s Error (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Dec. 10, 2002 Respondent`s Proposed Final Order filed.
Nov. 27, 2002 Order issued. (Petitioner`s motion for extension of time is granted, the proposed recommended orders shall be filed on or beford December 20, 2002)
Nov. 26, 2002 Motion for Extension of Time (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Nov. 18, 2002 Deposition (of Nelita Parris) filed.
Nov. 18, 2002 Transcript of Proceedings filed.
Nov. 13, 2002 Order issued. (Petitioner`s motion for extension of time is granted, the transcript of the final hearing held on October 23, 2002, and the transcript of the deposition taken on November 8, 2002, shall be filed on or before November 25, 2002)
Nov. 12, 2002 Motion for Extension of Time (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Oct. 29, 2002 Notice of Taking Deposition, N. Parris, B. Evans (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Oct. 23, 2002 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Oct. 16, 2002 Order issued. (ordered that William J. Cook, Esquire, and Baker, Rodems & Cook, P.A., attorney of record for Respondent, Model 2000, Inc., may withdraw appearance and is relieved of further responsibility in this cause)
Oct. 16, 2002 Notice of Filing (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Oct. 16, 2002 Notice of Filing (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Oct. 15, 2002 Notice of Reliance on Similar Fact Evidence (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Oct. 15, 2002 Letter to W. Cook from C. Tunnicliff enclosing new telephone number for telephonic hearing (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 15, 2002 Motion to Withdraw (filed W. Cook via facsimile).
Oct. 14, 2002 Petitioner`s Motion in Limine (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 14, 2002 Motion to Compel Discovery (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Oct. 11, 2002 Notice of Telephonic Motion Hearing issued. (telephonic hearing will be held on Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 8:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard)
Oct. 10, 2002 Petitioner`s Exhibit List (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 10, 2002 Petitioner`s Witness List (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 10, 2002 Notice of Taking Deposition, C. West (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 10, 2002 Motion to Compel Discovery (filed by Petitioner via facsimile)
Oct. 10, 2002 Notice of Additional Appearance (filed by C. Tunnicliff via facsimile).
Sep. 06, 2002 Notice of Filing (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Sep. 05, 2002 Amended Notice of Hearing issued. (hearing set for October 23 through 25, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL, amended as to time).
Aug. 30, 2002 Notice of Filing (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Aug. 26, 2002 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for October 23 through 25, 2002; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
Aug. 23, 2002 Letter to Judge Buckine from W. Cook requesting hearing dates (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 23, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
Aug. 23, 2002 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for September 18 through 20, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
Aug. 05, 2002 Notice of Appearance (filed by Peititoner via facsimile).
Aug. 05, 2002 Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Jul. 31, 2002 Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 02-002982, 02-002983, 02-002984, 02-002985, 02-002986, 02-002987, 02-002988, 02-002989, 02-002990, 02-002991, 02-002992, 02-002993, 02-002994, 02-002995, 02-002996)
Jul. 29, 2002 Agency referral filed.
Jul. 29, 2002 Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
Jul. 29, 2002 Election of Rights filed.
Jul. 29, 2002 Agency referral filed.
Jul. 29, 2002 Initial Order issued.
Jul. 29, 2002 Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
Jul. 29, 2002 Election of Rights filed.
Jul. 29, 2002 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 02-002988
Issue Date Document Summary
May 27, 2003 Agency Final Order
Jan. 10, 2003 Recommended Order Talent agency solicited business for models. Once public came in, promises were made: payment for photographs required as condition of engagement of services.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer