Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs CLARCONA RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 03-003208 (2003)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 03-003208 Visitors: 11
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
Respondent: CLARCONA RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Sep. 08, 2003
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, February 16, 2004.

Latest Update: May 07, 2004
Summary: The issues in the case are whether the allegations set forth in two separate Notices to Show Cause are correct, and, if so, what penalty, if any, should be imposed.The minutes of a meeting are "records" and must be transcribed to permit access. Recommend that failure to provide access to records warrants a fine of $7,500.
03-3208 amend RO.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ) PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ) DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, ) CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

) CLARCONA RESORT CONDOMINIUM ) ASSOCIATION, INC., )

)

Respondent. )


Case Nos. 03-3208

03-3209

)


ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION


On March 4, 2004, the Petitioner filed a Motion for Clarification and Amendment of the Recommended Order (Motion) issued on February 16, 2004, in this case. The Motion states that the Respondent has no objection to the Motion.


The Motion asserts that the Recommended Order applies an incorrect burden of proof to the evidence presented during the hearing. Paragraph 17 of the Recommended Order states that the "Petitioner has the burden of proving the allegations . . . by a preponderance of the evidence."


Neither the Petitioner nor the Respondent addressed the issue of the applicable standard of proof in the Proposed Recommended Orders filed by the parties following the hearing. Both parties now apparently agree that the Petitioner must establish the allegations by "clear and convincing evidence" and seek to have the undersigned "reweigh" the evidence.


The misstatement of the burden of proof in the Recommended Order does not alter the outcome. The essential dispute in the case was clear: whether the Respondent provided timely access pursuant to statutory requirements to records requested by residents. The evidence was likewise clear; as set forth in the Recommended Order, the Respondent failed to provide timely access to the requested records. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that:


Paragraph 17 of the Recommended Order is amended to read as follows:


17. The Petitioner has the burden of proving the allegations in the Notices to Show Cause by clear and convincing evidence. Department of Banking and Finance v. Osborne Stern and Company, 670 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1996). In this case, the burden has been met.


DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of March, 2004, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 8th day of March, 2004.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Joseph S. Garwood, Esquire Department of Business and Professional Regulation

The Augusta Building, Suite 100 8685 Northwest 53rd Terrace Miami, Florida 33166


Robert L. Taylor, Esquire Taylor & Carls, P.A. Suite 105

850 Concourse Parkway, South Maitland, Florida 32751


2


Docket for Case No: 03-003208
Issue Date Proceedings
May 07, 2004 Final Order filed.
Apr. 12, 2004 Notice of Filing (filed by Faulk & Sims via facsimile)
Mar. 25, 2004 Letter to C. Faulk from Judge Quattlebaum regarding participation in case.
Mar. 25, 2004 Notice of Ex-Parte Communication.
Mar. 24, 2004 Petitioner`s Response to Exceptions (filed via facsimile).
Mar. 23, 2004 Letter to Judge Quattlebaum from C. Faulk requesting status of the case (filed via facsimile).
Mar. 08, 2004 Order on Motion for Clarification (amending Paragraph 17 of the Recommended Order).
Mar. 04, 2004 Motion for Clarification and Amendment of the Recommended Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Feb. 16, 2004 Recommended Order (hearing held December 19, 2003). CASE CLOSED.
Feb. 16, 2004 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Feb. 02, 2004 Letter to R. Taylor from J. Garwood regarding the enclosed letter as exhibits to the deposition filed.
Jan. 23, 2004 Letter to Judge Wetherell from C. Faulk regarding the summary of the case (with exhibits) filed.
Jan. 23, 2004 (Proposed) Final Judgment (filed by R. Taylor via facsimile).
Jan. 22, 2004 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Jan. 20, 2004 Letter to Judge Wetherell from C. Faulk regarding the summary of the case (filed via facsimile).
Jan. 09, 2004 Letter to Judge Quattlebaum from R. Taylor regarding deposition of Mr. Ansel Wood filed.
Dec. 24, 2003 Deposition (of Ansel Wood) filed.
Dec. 19, 2003 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Dec. 18, 2003 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Service of Subpoena Ad Testificandum on Paul Bishop (filed by R. Taylor via facsimile).
Dec. 18, 2003 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Service of Subpoena Ad Testificandum on Ronald A. Cole (filed by R. Taylor via facsimile).
Dec. 10, 2003 (Joint) Pre-Hearing Stipulation (filed via facsimile).
Nov. 25, 2003 Notice of Taking Deposition Via Telephone in Lieu of Live Testimony at Hearing (A. Wood) filed via facsimile.
Nov. 24, 2003 Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (2), (M. Snyder and W. Sanborn filed.
Nov. 05, 2003 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 19, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Orlando, FL).
Nov. 03, 2003 Response to Order Granting Continuance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Oct. 27, 2003 Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by November 5, 2003).
Oct. 27, 2003 Joint Motion for Continuance (filed by J. Garwood via facsimile).
Oct. 20, 2003 Letter to DOAH from DPBR enclosing J. Garwood`s new address and requesting subpoenas (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 08, 2003 Letter to Judge Wetherell from J. Garwood (response to Initial Order) filed.
Sep. 24, 2003 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Sep. 24, 2003 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (video hearing set for November 14, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Orlando and Tallahassee, FL).
Sep. 23, 2003 Order of Consolidation. (consolidated cases are: 03-003208, 03-003209)
Sep. 19, 2003 Response to Initial Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Sep. 09, 2003 Initial Order.
Sep. 08, 2003 Notice to Show Cause filed.
Sep. 08, 2003 Petition for a DOAH Hearing filed.
Sep. 08, 2003 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 03-003208
Issue Date Document Summary
May 03, 2004 Agency Final Order
Apr. 12, 2004 Other
Mar. 08, 2004 Other
Feb. 16, 2004 Recommended Order The minutes of a meeting are "records" and must be transcribed to permit access. Recommend that failure to provide access to records warrants a fine of $7,500.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer