Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CYNTHIA DIANE SMITH vs DOLLAR GENERAL, 07-004305 (2007)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 07-004305 Visitors: 11
Petitioner: CYNTHIA DIANE SMITH
Respondent: DOLLAR GENERAL
Judges: BARBARA J. STAROS
Agency: Commissions
Locations: Leesburg, Florida
Filed: Sep. 19, 2007
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, January 15, 2008.

Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2008
Summary: Whether Respondent committed a violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as alleged in the Employment Complaint of Discrimination filed by Petitioner on February 5, 2007.Petitioner did not appear at the hearing as scheduled. Recommend dismissing employment complaint of discrimination.
STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


CYNTHIA DIANE SMITH,


Petitioner,


vs.


DOLLAR GENERAL,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 07-4305

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL


A hearing was held pursuant to notice, on January 10, 2008, in Leesburg, Florida, before the Division of Administrative Hearings by its designated Administrative Law Judge, Barbara J.

Staros.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: No appearance


For Respondent: Anthony J. Hall, Esquire

Littler Mendelson, P.C. 4767 New Broad Street Orlando, Florida 32814


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


Whether Respondent committed a violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as alleged in the Employment Complaint of Discrimination filed by Petitioner on February 5, 2007.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


Because of the procedural nature of the findings in this case, the matters normally contained in the Preliminary Statement are reflected in the Findings of fact below.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. On February 5, 2007, Petitioner, Cynthia D. Smith, filed an Employment Complaint of Discrimination with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR). On September 6, 2007, FCHR issued a Determination: No Cause and a Notice of Determination: No Cause. Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief with FCHR on or about September 17, 2007.

  2. FCHR transmitted the case to the Division of Administrative Hearings (Division) on or about September 19, 2007, for the purpose of conducting a formal administrative hearing. A Notice of Hearing and Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions were issued on October 16, 2007, setting the case for hearing on December 18, 2007, in Leesburg, Florida, where Petitioner resides.

  3. Respondent filed an unopposed Motion for Continuance which was granted. An Order Granting Continuance and Re- Scheduling Hearing was issued on December 3, 2007, rescheduling the hearing for January 10, 2007, in Leesburg.

  4. The undersigned traveled from Tallahassee to Leesburg, Florida, to conduct the hearing. The hearing commenced as scheduled. Respondent and its witnesses were present and ready to proceed. Petitioner was not present when the hearing commenced.

  5. The undersigned recessed the hearing to give Petitioner every opportunity to arrive. The undersigned checked the reception area and the parking lot of the building where the hearing was located to see if Petitioner was anywhere in or around the building. In addition, the undersigned called her assistant in Tallahassee to determine if any pleading had been filed on the docket of the Division or any telephone call received indicating Petitioner was delayed. No such communication had been received.

  6. While waiting for Petitioner to arrive, the undersigned examined the address for Petitioner on the Order Granting Continuance and Re-Scheduling Hearing. The address matched the address on all orders mailed from the Division as well as the address furnished by FCHR to the Division.

  7. The hearing was reconvened approximately 35 minutes after the time the hearing was scheduled to begin. However, Petitioner did not appear and the hearing was adjourned.

  8. There is nothing on the docket of the Division that indicates that the Order Granting Continuance and Re-Scheduling Hearing, or any other order, mailed to Petitioner was returned as undeliverable.1/

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  9. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this proceeding. §§ 120.569, 120.57, and 760.11, Fla. Stat.

  10. Petitioner bears the initial burden of proving a prima facie case of discrimination. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,

411 U.S. 792 (1973); Texas Department of Community Affairs v.


Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981). Since Petitioner did not avail herself of the opportunity to present a prima facie case, the hearing was closed.

RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and the Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED:


That the Florida Commission on Human Relations enter a final order dismissing Petitioner's Employment Complaint of Discrimination.

DONE AND ENTERED this 15th day of January, 2008, in


Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S


BARBARA J. STAROS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 15th day of January, 2008.


ENDNOTE


1/ If a piece of mail is returned to the Division with any indication that it was not delivered as addressed, it is posted on the docket for that particular case.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Cynthia Diane Smith 906 Perkins Street

Leesburg, Florida 34748


Anthony J. Hall, Esquire Littler Mendelson, P.C. 4767 New Broad Street Orlando, Florida 32814


Cecil Howard, General Counsel

Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk

Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 1000

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 07-004305
Issue Date Proceedings
Mar. 14, 2008 Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Jan. 15, 2008 Recommended Order of Dismissal. CASE CLOSED.
Jan. 10, 2008 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Jan. 04, 2008 Respondent`s Witness List filed.
Jan. 04, 2008 Notice of Filing Respondent`s Witness List filed.
Dec. 06, 2007 Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
Dec. 03, 2007 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for January 10, 2008; 10:00 a.m.; Leesburg, FL).
Nov. 16, 2007 Respondent`s Motion to Reschedule Hearing filed.
Oct. 17, 2007 Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
Oct. 16, 2007 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Oct. 16, 2007 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 18, 2007; 10:00 a.m.; Leesburg, FL).
Oct. 08, 2007 Respondent`s Response to the Initial Order filed.
Oct. 08, 2007 Notice of Appearance (filed by A. Hall).
Sep. 19, 2007 Employment Complaint of Discrimination fled.
Sep. 19, 2007 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
Sep. 19, 2007 Determination: No Cause filed.
Sep. 19, 2007 Petition for Relief filed.
Sep. 19, 2007 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Sep. 19, 2007 Initial Order.

Orders for Case No: 07-004305
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 13, 2008 Agency Final Order
Jan. 15, 2008 Recommended Order Petitioner did not appear at the hearing as scheduled. Recommend dismissing employment complaint of discrimination.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer