Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING-LAKELAND vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 07-004732 (2007)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 07-004732 Visitors: 11
Petitioner: LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING-LAKELAND
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Judges: LAWRENCE P. STEVENSON
Agency: Department of Transportation
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Oct. 12, 2007
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, February 21, 2008.

Latest Update: May 18, 2009
Summary: At issue in these consolidated proceedings is whether the permits for signs bearing tag numbers BT339, AE862, and AX116 should be revoked, pursuant to Section 479.08, Florida Statutes (2007).Respondent demonstrated that permits for nonconforming signs should be revoked, where the number of support poles was changed and the permittee failed to make corrections within the time alotted by notice.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Haydon Burns Building 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, Florida LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING- LAKELAND, Petitioner, DOAH CASE NO.: 07-4732 vs. DOAH CASE NO.: 07-4734 DOT CASE NO.: 06-036 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DOT CASE NO.: 06-037 Respondent. / FINAL ORDER This proceeding was initiated by the timely filing of Petitions for Formal Administrative Hearing by Petitioner, Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland (Lamar), in response to Notices of Intent to Revoke Sign Permits issued on March 21, 2006, and revised Notices issued on July 31, 2007, by the Respondent, Department of Transportation (Department). The sign permits in issue are numbers 13778 and 13779 for sign tag numbers BT339 and AE862, and number 7359 for sign tag number AX116. On October 12, 2007, the matters were referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) for assignment of an Administrative Law Judge and a formal hearing. An order consolidating the cases was issued December 17, 2007. A formal administrative hearing was held in these cases in Tallahassee, Florida, on December 20 2007, before Lawrence P. Stevenson, a duly appointed Administrative Law Judge. Appearances on behalf of the parties were as follows: Page 1 of 5 For Petitioner: Gerald S. Livingston, Esquire Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell & Dunbar, P.A. 215 South Monroe Street, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 For Respondent: Susan Schwartz, Esquire Assistant General Counsel Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458 At the hearing Lamar presented the testimony of Dave Henry, and offered Petitioner’s Exhibits 1 through 3, which were admitted into evidence. The Department presented the telephonic testimony of Steve Leslie and Mark A. Johnson, and in-person testimony of Lynn Holschuh, and offered Respondent’s Exhibits 1 through 17, which were admitted into evidence. The transcript from the December 20, 2007, hearing was filed January 7, 2008. The Department filed its Proposed Recommended Order on January 28, 2008, and Lamar filed its Proposed Recommended Order on January 29, 2008. On February 21, 2008, Judge Stevenson issued his Recommended Order. On March 7, 2008, Lamar filed its exceptions to the Recommended Order, and the Department filed its responses to Lamar’s exceptions on March 17, 2008. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE As stated by the Administrative Law Judge in his Recommended Order, the issue presented was “whether the permits for signs bearing tag numbers BT339, AE862, and AX116 should be revoked, pursuant to Section 479.08, Florida Statutes (2007).” EXCEPTIONS TO RECOMMENDED ORDER Lamar takes exception to Conclusions of Law 24, 25, 27, 28, and 29. Regarding an agency’s treatment of conclusions of law, Section 120.57(1)(1), Florida Page 2 of 5 Statutes provides: The agency in its final order may reject or modify the conclusions of law over which it has substantive jurisdiction and interpretation of administrative rules over which it has substantive jurisdiction. When rejecting or modifying such conclusion of Jaw or interpretation of administrative rule, the agency must state with particularity its reasons for rejecting or modifying such conclusion of law or interpretation of administrative rule and must make a finding that its substituted conclusion of law or interpretation of administrative rule is as or more reasonable than that which was rejected or modified. After consideration of Lamar’s exceptions to Conclusions of Law 24, 25, 27, 28, and 29, the Department finds that these Conclusions of Law comport with the Department’s interpretation and application of controlling statutes and rules over which it has substantive jurisdiction and are otherwise fully supported in law. Accordingly, Lamar’s exceptions to Conclusions of Law 24, 25, 27, 28 and 29 are rejected. FINDINGS OF FACT After review of the record in its entirety, it is determined that the Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact in paragraphs 1 through 20 are supported by competent, substantial evidence and are adopted and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Department has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this proceeding pursuant to Chapters 120 and 479, Florida Statutes. 2. The Conclusions of Law in paragraphs 21 through 29 of the Recommended Order are fully supported in law, and are adopted and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. Page 3 of 5 ORDER Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED that Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland’s sign permit numbers 13778 and 13779 for sign tag numbers BT339! and AE862 and sign permit number 7359 for sign tag number AX116 are revoked. ORDERED that Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland shall remove the outdoor advertising signs it maintains under sign permit numbers 13778 and 13779, tag numbers BT339/CF221 and AE862 and sign permit number 7359, tag number AX116, within 30 days of this Order. It is further ORDERED that should Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland fail to remove the sigs within the next 30 days, the Department of Transportation, or its contractor, will remove the signs without further notice and the cost of removal is hereby assessed against Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland, pursuant to Section 479.10, Florida Statutes. DONE AND ORDERED this 207 day of May, 2008. 0002 qu AY : Giese Hd O¢ yuaTo “L'0 Stephanie C. Kopelousps Secretary Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 ‘At the time of hearing, tag number BT339 had been replaced by tag number CF221. Page 4 of 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL THIS ORDER CONSTITUTES FINAL AGENCY ACTION AND MAY BE APPEALED BY ANY PARTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND RULES 9.110 AND 9.190, FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, BY FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 9.100(d), FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, BOTH WITH THE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, ACCOMPANIED BY THE APPROPRIATE FILING FEE, AND WITH THE DEPARTMENT’S CLERK OF AGENCY PROCEEDINGS, HAYDON BURNS BUILDING, 605 SUWANNEE STREET, M.S. 58, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0458, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF RENDITION OF THIS ORDER. Copies furnished to: Susan Schwartz, Esquire Assistant General Counsel Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458 Lawrence P. Stevenson Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 Lynn Holschuh State Outdoor Advertising Administrator Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 22 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Gerald S. Livingston, Esquire Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson Bell & Dunbar, P.A. 215 South Monroe Street, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Page 5 of 5

Docket for Case No: 07-004732
Issue Date Proceedings
May 18, 2009 Opinion filed.
May 23, 2008 Final Order filed.
Feb. 21, 2008 Recommended Order (hearing held December 20, 2007). CASE CLOSED.
Feb. 21, 2008 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jan. 29, 2008 Lamar Advertising Company - Lakeland Proposed Recommended Order (07-4732) filed.
Jan. 29, 2008 Lamar Advertising Company-Lakeland`s Proposed Recmmended Order (07-4734) filed.
Jan. 29, 2008 Notice of Filing Lamar Advertising Company-Lakeland`s Proposed Recmmended Order (07-4734) filed.
Jan. 29, 2008 Notice of Filing Lamar Advertising Company-Lakeland`s Proposed Recmmended Order (074732) filed.
Jan. 28, 2008 Proposed Recommended Order of Respondent, Department of Transportation filed.
Jan. 07, 2008 Transcript filed.
Dec. 31, 2007 Respondent`s Notice of Filing Notary Affidavit (S. Leslie).
Dec. 31, 2007 Respondent`s Notice of Filing Notary Affidavit (M. Johnson).
Dec. 24, 2007 Affidavit of C. Salazar filed.
Dec. 20, 2007 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Dec. 17, 2007 Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 07-4732 and 07-4734).
Dec. 14, 2007 Motion to Consolidate Cases filed.
Dec. 13, 2007 Respondent`s Motion to Allow Witness Testimony by Telephone filed.
Dec. 10, 2007 Joint Stipulated Pre-hearing Report filed.
Dec. 10, 2007 Respondent`s Notice of Serving Response to Petitioner`s First Request for Production of Documents filed.
Dec. 07, 2007 Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
Dec. 07, 2007 Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 07-4732 and 07-4894).
Dec. 05, 2007 Motion to Consolidate Cases (DOAH case numbers 07-4894, 07-4732) filed.
Nov. 07, 2007 Plantiff`s First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant filed.
Nov. 07, 2007 Plantiff`s First Request for Production of Documents to Defendant filed.
Oct. 30, 2007 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Oct. 30, 2007 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 18, 2007; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Oct. 26, 2007 Department`s Notice of Serving First Request for Production of Documents to Petitioner filed.
Oct. 24, 2007 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Oct. 15, 2007 Initial Order.
Oct. 12, 2007 Amended Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
Oct. 12, 2007 Notice of Intent to Revoke Sign Permit for Noncompliance filed.
Oct. 12, 2007 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 07-004732
Issue Date Document Summary
May 15, 2009 Opinion
May 20, 2008 Agency Final Order
Feb. 21, 2008 Recommended Order Respondent demonstrated that permits for nonconforming signs should be revoked, where the number of support poles was changed and the permittee failed to make corrections within the time alotted by notice.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer