Petitioner: LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING-LAKELAND
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Judges: LAWRENCE P. STEVENSON
Agency: Department of Transportation
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Oct. 12, 2007
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, February 21, 2008.
Latest Update: May 18, 2009
Summary: At issue in these consolidated proceedings is whether the permits for signs bearing tag numbers BT339, AE862, and AX116 should be revoked, pursuant to Section 479.08, Florida Statutes (2007).Respondent demonstrated that permits for nonconforming signs should be revoked, where the number of support poles was changed and the permittee failed to make corrections within the time alotted by notice.
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Haydon Burns Building
605 Suwannee Street
Tallahassee, Florida
LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING-
LAKELAND,
Petitioner,
DOAH CASE NO.: 07-4732
vs. DOAH CASE NO.: 07-4734
DOT CASE NO.: 06-036
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DOT CASE NO.: 06-037
Respondent.
/
FINAL ORDER
This proceeding was initiated by the timely filing of Petitions for Formal Administrative
Hearing by Petitioner, Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland (Lamar), in response to Notices of
Intent to Revoke Sign Permits issued on March 21, 2006, and revised Notices issued on July 31,
2007, by the Respondent, Department of Transportation (Department). The sign permits in issue
are numbers 13778 and 13779 for sign tag numbers BT339 and AE862, and number 7359 for sign
tag number AX116. On October 12, 2007, the matters were referred to the Division of
Administrative Hearings (DOAH) for assignment of an Administrative Law Judge and a formal
hearing. An order consolidating the cases was issued December 17, 2007.
A formal administrative hearing was held in these cases in Tallahassee, Florida, on
December 20 2007, before Lawrence P. Stevenson, a duly appointed Administrative Law Judge.
Appearances on behalf of the parties were as follows:
Page 1 of 5
For Petitioner: Gerald S. Livingston, Esquire
Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell & Dunbar, P.A.
215 South Monroe Street, Suite 200
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
For Respondent: Susan Schwartz, Esquire
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Transportation
605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458
At the hearing Lamar presented the testimony of Dave Henry, and offered Petitioner’s
Exhibits 1 through 3, which were admitted into evidence. The Department presented the
telephonic testimony of Steve Leslie and Mark A. Johnson, and in-person testimony of Lynn
Holschuh, and offered Respondent’s Exhibits 1 through 17, which were admitted into evidence.
The transcript from the December 20, 2007, hearing was filed January 7, 2008. The Department
filed its Proposed Recommended Order on January 28, 2008, and Lamar filed its Proposed
Recommended Order on January 29, 2008. On February 21, 2008, Judge Stevenson issued his
Recommended Order. On March 7, 2008, Lamar filed its exceptions to the Recommended Order,
and the Department filed its responses to Lamar’s exceptions on March 17, 2008.
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
As stated by the Administrative Law Judge in his Recommended Order, the issue presented
was “whether the permits for signs bearing tag numbers BT339, AE862, and AX116 should be
revoked, pursuant to Section 479.08, Florida Statutes (2007).”
EXCEPTIONS TO RECOMMENDED ORDER
Lamar takes exception to Conclusions of Law 24, 25, 27, 28, and 29.
Regarding an agency’s treatment of conclusions of law, Section 120.57(1)(1), Florida
Page 2 of 5
Statutes provides:
The agency in its final order may reject or modify the conclusions
of law over which it has substantive jurisdiction and interpretation
of administrative rules over which it has substantive jurisdiction.
When rejecting or modifying such conclusion of Jaw or
interpretation of administrative rule, the agency must state with
particularity its reasons for rejecting or modifying such conclusion
of law or interpretation of administrative rule and must make a
finding that its substituted conclusion of law or interpretation of
administrative rule is as or more reasonable than that which was
rejected or modified.
After consideration of Lamar’s exceptions to Conclusions of Law 24, 25, 27, 28, and 29,
the Department finds that these Conclusions of Law comport with the Department’s interpretation
and application of controlling statutes and rules over which it has substantive jurisdiction and are
otherwise fully supported in law. Accordingly, Lamar’s exceptions to Conclusions of Law 24,
25, 27, 28 and 29 are rejected.
FINDINGS OF FACT
After review of the record in its entirety, it is determined that the Administrative Law
Judge’s Findings of Fact in paragraphs 1 through 20 are supported by competent, substantial
evidence and are adopted and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The Department has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this
proceeding pursuant to Chapters 120 and 479, Florida Statutes.
2. The Conclusions of Law in paragraphs 21 through 29 of the Recommended Order are
fully supported in law, and are adopted and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
Page 3 of 5
ORDER
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is
ORDERED that Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland’s sign permit numbers 13778 and
13779 for sign tag numbers BT339! and AE862 and sign permit number 7359 for sign tag number
AX116 are revoked.
ORDERED that Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland shall remove the outdoor
advertising signs it maintains under sign permit numbers 13778 and 13779, tag numbers
BT339/CF221 and AE862 and sign permit number 7359, tag number AX116, within 30 days of
this Order. It is further
ORDERED that should Lamar Outdoor Advertising-Lakeland fail to remove the sigs
within the next 30 days, the Department of Transportation, or its contractor, will remove the signs
without further notice and the cost of removal is hereby assessed against Lamar Outdoor
Advertising-Lakeland, pursuant to Section 479.10, Florida Statutes.
DONE AND ORDERED this 207 day of May, 2008.
0002
qu
AY
:
Giese Hd O¢
yuaTo “L'0
Stephanie C. Kopelousps
Secretary
Department of Transportation
Haydon Burns Building
605 Suwannee Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
‘At the time of hearing, tag number BT339 had been replaced by tag number CF221.
Page 4 of 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
THIS ORDER CONSTITUTES FINAL AGENCY ACTION AND MAY BE
APPEALED BY ANY PARTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES,
AND RULES 9.110 AND 9.190, FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, BY
FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE
9.100(d), FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, BOTH WITH THE
APPROPRIATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, ACCOMPANIED BY THE
APPROPRIATE FILING FEE, AND WITH THE DEPARTMENT’S CLERK OF AGENCY
PROCEEDINGS, HAYDON BURNS BUILDING, 605 SUWANNEE STREET, M.S. 58,
TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0458, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF RENDITION
OF THIS ORDER.
Copies furnished to:
Susan Schwartz, Esquire
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Transportation
Haydon Burns Building
605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458
Lawrence P. Stevenson
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550
Lynn Holschuh
State Outdoor Advertising Administrator
Department of Transportation
Haydon Burns Building
605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 22
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Gerald S. Livingston, Esquire
Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson
Bell & Dunbar, P.A.
215 South Monroe Street, Suite 200
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Page 5 of 5
Docket for Case No: 07-004732
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
May 18, 2009 |
Opinion filed.
|
May 23, 2008 |
Final Order filed.
|
Feb. 21, 2008 |
Recommended Order (hearing held December 20, 2007). CASE CLOSED.
|
Feb. 21, 2008 |
Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
|
Jan. 29, 2008 |
Lamar Advertising Company - Lakeland Proposed Recommended Order (07-4732) filed.
|
Jan. 29, 2008 |
Lamar Advertising Company-Lakeland`s Proposed Recmmended Order (07-4734) filed.
|
Jan. 29, 2008 |
Notice of Filing Lamar Advertising Company-Lakeland`s Proposed Recmmended Order (07-4734) filed.
|
Jan. 29, 2008 |
Notice of Filing Lamar Advertising Company-Lakeland`s Proposed Recmmended Order (074732) filed.
|
Jan. 28, 2008 |
Proposed Recommended Order of Respondent, Department of Transportation filed.
|
Jan. 07, 2008 |
Transcript filed. |
Dec. 31, 2007 |
Respondent`s Notice of Filing Notary Affidavit (S. Leslie).
|
Dec. 31, 2007 |
Respondent`s Notice of Filing Notary Affidavit (M. Johnson).
|
Dec. 24, 2007 |
Affidavit of C. Salazar filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2007 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Dec. 17, 2007 |
Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 07-4732 and 07-4734).
|
Dec. 14, 2007 |
Motion to Consolidate Cases filed.
|
Dec. 13, 2007 |
Respondent`s Motion to Allow Witness Testimony by Telephone filed.
|
Dec. 10, 2007 |
Joint Stipulated Pre-hearing Report filed.
|
Dec. 10, 2007 |
Respondent`s Notice of Serving Response to Petitioner`s First Request for Production of Documents filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2007 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2007 |
Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 07-4732 and 07-4894).
|
Dec. 05, 2007 |
Motion to Consolidate Cases (DOAH case numbers 07-4894, 07-4732) filed.
|
Nov. 07, 2007 |
Plantiff`s First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant filed.
|
Nov. 07, 2007 |
Plantiff`s First Request for Production of Documents to Defendant filed.
|
Oct. 30, 2007 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Oct. 30, 2007 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 18, 2007; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
|
Oct. 26, 2007 |
Department`s Notice of Serving First Request for Production of Documents to Petitioner filed.
|
Oct. 24, 2007 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Oct. 15, 2007 |
Initial Order.
|
Oct. 12, 2007 |
Amended Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Oct. 12, 2007 |
Notice of Intent to Revoke Sign Permit for Noncompliance filed.
|
Oct. 12, 2007 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Orders for Case No: 07-004732
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
May 15, 2009 |
Opinion
|
|
May 20, 2008 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Feb. 21, 2008 |
Recommended Order
|
Respondent demonstrated that permits for nonconforming signs should be revoked, where the number of support poles was changed and the permittee failed to make corrections within the time alotted by notice.
|