Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MATTHEW J. KACHINAS, M.D., 09-004680PL (2009)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 09-004680PL Visitors: 11
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: MATTHEW J. KACHINAS, M.D.
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Sarasota, Florida
Filed: Aug. 26, 2009
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, January 26, 2010.

Latest Update: May 07, 2010
Summary: The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002), in DOAH Case No. 09-4678PL; Subsections 456.072(1)(l), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), in DOAH Case No. 09-4679PL; and Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), in DOAH Case No. 09-4680PL, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent committed gross malpractice when he failed to identify the twin with an
More
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Petitioner, v. . DOH Case No. 2007-30311 MATTHEW J. KACHINAS, M.D., Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Medicine against Respondent, Matthew J. Kachinas, M.D., and in support thereof alleges: , 1. Petitioner is the state department charged with regulating the practice of medicine pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter 456, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 458, Florida Statutes. 2. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent was a licensed medical doctor within the state of Florida, having been issued license number ME 65595. 3. Respondent's address of record is 6122 S. Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, Florida 34231. 8002 T 0 AWW 4. Patient Ms. K.M. was evaluated at Florida Perinatal Associates on or about December 13, 2005, and was found to be pregnant with a dichorionic (separate placenta) diamniotic (separate sac) twin gestation of twelve weeks four days. 5. A non-septated cystic hygroma (internal cyst containing fluid without separate compartments) was noted for twin A. . 6. Amniocentesis was performed and the result for twin A was 47,XY,+21 and consistent with a male fetus with Down Syndrome. At the time of the amniocentesis, several fetal anomalies were noted for twin A, including a non-septated cystic hygroma, a short femur, an absent nasal bone, and a cardiac anomaly. 7. The fetal anatomy survey for twin B was normal. 8. Ms. K.M. decided that she would seek a selective fetal reduction and was evaluated by Respondent at Premier Institute for Women’s Health. A selective feticide was done on or about January 13, 2006. 9. When Ms. K.M. returned to Florida Perinatal Associates, on or about January 24, 2006, an ultrasound revealed that the remaining live fetus was the one with the congenital anomalies and Down Syndrome. Respondent had performed the feticide on the normal twin B. J:\PSU\Medical\DIANE\kachinas\Kachinas AC 2007-3031 1.doc 2 10. On or about January 27, 2006, Ms. K.M. returned to the Respondent for termination of pregnancy of the fetus with the congenital anomalies. 11. The standard of care for selective termination of pregnancy requires that the correct fetus be identified prior to the feticide. Several ways exist to correctly identify the correct fetus, including the position of the fetus in relationship to the mother, differentiation by gender, and use of ultrasound findings. | 12. Respondent failed to identify the position of twin A in relationship to the mother, even though the ultrasound from Florida Perinatal Associates states that twin B is located toward the maternal right. 13. Respondent failed to clearly differentiate the sex of the fetuses by ultrasound even though twin A (the affected one) was a male and twin B was a female. ~~-~44, -Respondent failed to identify the affected twin by ultrasound even though the affected twin had multiple anomalies including a cystic “hygroma, shortened long bones, and possible A-F canal, whereas twin B’s ultrasound was normal. 3:\PSU\Medical\DIANE\kachinas\Kachinas AC 2007-3031 1.doc 3 15. Respondent failed to meet the standard of care by failing to perform a thorough ultrasound examination in order to identify the correct fetus. 16. Respondent did not document his attempts to identify the sex or multiple anomalies previously reported for twin A. COUNT ONE 17. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (4) through sixteen (16) as if fully set forth herein. 18. Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), subjects a doctor to discipline for committing medical malpractice as defined in Section 456.50. Section 456.50, Florida Statutes (2005), defines medical malpractice as the failure to practice medicine in accordance with the level ~ of care, skill, and treatment recognized in general law related to health care licensure. 19. Level of care, skill, and treatment recognized in general law related to health care licensure means the standard of care specified in Section 766.102. Section 766.102(1), Florida Statutes (2005), defines the standard of care to mean“. . . The prevailing professional standard of care for a given health care provider shall be that level of care, skill, and treatment which, in light of all relevant surrounding circumstances, is J:\PSU\Medical\DIANE\kachinas\Kachinas AC 2007-30311.doc 4 recognized as acceptable and appropriate by reasonably prudent similar health care providers. wee 20. Respondent failed to meet the prevailing standard of care in regard to patient Ms. K.M. in one or more of the following ways: a. By failing to identify the position of twin A in relationship to the mother, even though the ultrasound from Florida Perinatal Associates states that twin B is located toward the maternal right; b. By failing to clearly differentiate the sex of the fetuses by ultrasound even though twin A (the affected one) was a male and twin B was a female; c. By failing to identify the affected twin by ultrasound even though the affected twin had multiple anomalies including a cystic hygroma, shortened long bones, and possible A-F canal, whereas twin B’s ultrasound was normal; --d:--~ By failing-to perform-a thorough ultrasound examination _ in order to identify the correct fetus; . “e. =By failing to document his attempts to identify the Sex or multiple anomalies previously reported for twin A; f. By performing a feticide in the non-affected fetus. J:\PSU\Medical\DIANE\kachinas\Kachinas AC 2007-30311.doc . 5 21. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), by committing medical malpractice. COUNT TWO 22. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through sixteen (16) as if fully set forth herein. . 23. Section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2005), provides that failing to keep legible, as defined by department rule in consultation with the board, medical records . . . that justify the course of treatment of the patient, including, but not limited to, patient histories; examination results; test results; records of drugs prescribed, dispensed, or administered; and reports of consultations and hospitalizations constitutes grounds - for disciplinary action by the Board of Medicine. 24. Respondent failed to document his attempts to identify the sex or multiple anomalies previously reported for twin A. 25. Based on ‘the ~foregoing, ‘Respondent: -has -violated--Section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2005), by failing to keep legible, as defined by department rule in-consultation with the board, medical records . .. that justify the course of treatment of the patient, including, but not limited to, patient histories; examination results; test results; records of J:\PSU\Medical\DIANE\kachinas\Kachinas AC 2007-30311.doc 6 drugs prescribed, dispensed, or administered; and reports of consultations and hospitalizations. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of Medicine enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties: permanent revocation or suspension of Respondent's license, restriction of practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief that the Board deems appropriate. SIGNED this _2¢% day of aa , 2008. Ana M. Viamonte Ros, M.D., M.P.H. Secretary of Health - tex Diane K. Kiefline DEPARTMENT OF Er Dian Assistant Géneral Counsel ty CLERK 0 PS DOH-Prosecution Services Unit CLERK: os 4052 Bald Cypress Way-Bin C-65 mT STS Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265 Florida Bar # 233285 (850) 245-4640 (850) 245-4681 fax per: 4-45.08 PCP Members: g-{. Bahai, Beakison, Aone Matthew J. Kachinas, M.D. DOH Case No. 2007-30311 J:\PSU\Medical\DIANE\kachinas\Kachinas AC 2007-30311.doc 7 Matthew J. Kachinas, M.D. DOH Case No. 2007-30311 NOTICE OF RIGHTS Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be conducted in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other qualified representative, to present evidence and argument, to. call and cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena duces tecum issued on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested. NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred costs related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter. Pursuant to Section 456.072(4), Florida Statutes, the Board shall assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of a disciplinary matter, which may include attorney hours and costs, on the Respondent in addition to any other discipline imposed. 3:\PSU\Medical\DIANE\kachinas\Kachinas AC 2007-3031 1.doc 8

Docket for Case No: 09-004680PL
Issue Date Proceedings
May 07, 2010 Petition for Stay of Final Order filed.
May 07, 2010 Order Denying Stay of Final Order filed.
May 07, 2010 Department's Response Opposing Respondent's Motion to Stay Execution of Final Order filed.
Apr. 20, 2010 Agency Final Order filed.
Jan. 26, 2010 Recommended Order (hearing held November 18 and 19, 2009). CASE CLOSED.
Jan. 26, 2010 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Dec. 28, 2009 Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Dec. 28, 2009 Petitioner's Filing of Respondent's Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
Dec. 28, 2009 Respondent's Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
Dec. 28, 2009 (Petitioner's) Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Dec. 15, 2009 Transcript (Volumes I-III) filed.
Nov. 18, 2009 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Nov. 13, 2009 Petitioner's Unilateral Pre-trial Statement filed.
Nov. 13, 2009 Notice of Filing Petitioner's Amended Exhibit and Witness Lists filed.
Nov. 13, 2009 Order on Renewed Motion to Compel and for Sanctions.
Nov. 13, 2009 CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held.
Nov. 12, 2009 CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held.
Nov. 12, 2009 Petitioner's First Request for Admissions (Case No. 09-4680PL) filed.
Nov. 12, 2009 Petitioner's First Request for Admissions (Case No. 09-4679PL) filed.
Nov. 12, 2009 Petitioner's First Request for Admissions (Case No. 09-4678PL) filed.
Nov. 10, 2009 Petitioner's Renewed Motion to Compel and for Sanctions filed.
Nov. 06, 2009 Exhibit List (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
Nov. 06, 2009 Witness List filed.
Nov. 06, 2009 Notice of Filing Petitioner's Exhibits and Witness List filed.
Nov. 02, 2009 Order Granting Extension of Time (responses to Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories, First Requests for Production, and First Requests for Admissions to be filed by November 4, 2009).
Oct. 30, 2009 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Request for Extension filed.
Oct. 30, 2009 Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
Oct. 30, 2009 Letter to Judge Harrell from M. Kachinas requesting extension to file required information filed.
Oct. 26, 2009 Order Granting Motion to Compel.
Oct. 26, 2009 CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held.
Oct. 22, 2009 Notice of Telephonic Motion Hearing (motion hearing set for October 26, 2009; 10:45 a.m.).
Oct. 21, 2009 Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition of Witness in Lieu of Live Testimony (as to time only) filed.
Oct. 21, 2009 Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition of Witness in Lieu of Live Testimony filed.
Oct. 21, 2009 Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of W. Morales) filed.
Oct. 21, 2009 Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of D. Boucher) filed.
Oct. 07, 2009 Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum filed.
Oct. 07, 2009 Petitioner's Motion to Compel filed.
Sep. 22, 2009 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Sep. 22, 2009 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for November 18 and 19, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Sarasota, FL).
Sep. 22, 2009 Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 09-4678PL, 09-4679PL and 09-4680PL).
Sep. 08, 2009 Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
Sep. 02, 2009 Order Granting Extension of Time (response to the Initial Order to be filed by September 8, 2009).
Sep. 01, 2009 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Initial Order filed.
Aug. 31, 2009 Notice of Serving Petitioner's First Request for Production, First Request for Interrogatories and First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
Aug. 26, 2009 Notice of Appearance of Co-counsel (of G. Kim) filed.
Aug. 26, 2009 Notice of Appearance (filed by D. Kiesling).
Aug. 26, 2009 Initial Order.
Aug. 26, 2009 Agency referral filed.
Aug. 26, 2009 Election of Rights filed.
Aug. 26, 2009 Administrative Complaint filed.

Orders for Case No: 09-004680PL
Issue Date Document Summary
Apr. 20, 2010 Agency Final Order
Jan. 26, 2010 Recommended Order Respondent committed gross malpractice when he failed to identify the twin with anomalies in a selected feticide and performed the procedure on the normal twin.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer