Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JESSE BEAUREGARD vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL, 12-002331 (2012)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 12-002331 Visitors: 23
Petitioner: JESSE BEAUREGARD
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL
Judges: STUART M. LERNER
Agency: Department of Financial Services
Locations: Laurel, Florida
Filed: Jul. 11, 2012
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, August 17, 2012.

Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2012
Summary: Whether Petitioner's challenge to the failing score he received on the Practical Examination for Retention of Firefighter Retest he took on May 17, 2012, should be sustained.Recommend that challenge to failing score on the firefighter retention examination be denied, where challenger, who had the burden of proof, failed to make an appearance at the final hearing and to present evidence in support of his challenge.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


JESSE BEAUREGARD, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 12-2331

)

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL )

SERVICES, DIVISION OF )

STATE FIRE MARSHALL, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a hearing was conducted in this case pursuant to sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, before Stuart M. Lerner, a duly-designated administrative law judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH), on August 17, 2012, by video teleconference at sites in Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: No appearance


For Respondent: Linje E. Rivers, Esquire

Department of Financial Services

200 East Gaines Street, Sixth Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0333



STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


Whether Petitioner's challenge to the failing score he received on the Practical Examination for Retention of Firefighter Retest he took on May 17, 2012, should be sustained.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By letter dated May 31, 2012, the Department of Financial Services, Division of Fire Marshall, Bureau of Fire Standards and Training (Department) notified Petitioner that he had failed to "achieve a passing score on the Practical Examination for Retention of Firefighter Retest" (Retention Retest) and that, "[b]ecause [he had] not pass[ed] the retest [his] Firefighter Certificate of Compliance #151665 ha[d] expired as of 5/17/2012."

On June 20, 2012, Petitioner filed with the Department an executed Election of Rights "request[ing] a formal adversarial proceeding pursuant to [s]ection 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, to be held before [DOAH]" to challenge the failing score he had received on the Retention Retest. The matter was referred to DOAH on July 11, 2012, for the assignment of an administrative law judge to conduct the hearing Petitioner had requested.

The final hearing in the instant case was scheduled by video teleconference at sites in Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, Florida, for August 17, 2012, commencing at 9:00


    1. Petitioner and Respondent were provided with written notice of the scheduled hearing in accordance with section 120.569(2)(b). Such notice was in the form of a Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference mailed on July 24, 2012, to Petitioner and to Respondent's counsel of record, Linje Rivers, Esquire.

      Respondent appeared at the hearing, which was held as scheduled on August 17, 2012, through its counsel of record, Mr. Rivers. Petitioner, on the other hand, did not make an appearance at the hearing, either in person or through counsel or any other authorized representative.

      After waiting approximately 45 minutes for Petitioner to appear, and not having heard from him, the undersigned went on the record. Mr. Rivers, on behalf of Respondent, declined to present any evidence, arguing, persuasively, that it was Petitioner, not Respondent, who had the burden of proof and that therefore Petitioner's failure to appear at the hearing and offer evidence in support of his challenge should result in the denial of his challenge. The undersigned indicated that he agreed and that he would issue an order recommending that Respondent take such action. The hearing was thereupon concluded.

      Unless otherwise indicated, statutory citations in this Recommended Order refer to the 2012 version of Florida Statutes.


      FINDINGS OF FACT


      1. Because no evidence was offered at the final hearing held in the instant case, no findings of fact are made.

        CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


      2. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and of the parties hereto pursuant to sections 120.569 and 120.57(1).

      3. To be employed as a regular or permanent firefighter in Florida, a person needs to possess a certificate of compliance issued by the Department. Successfully completing a Department- prescribed firefighter training program, passing a state examination, and meeting the requirements of section 633.34(1) through (3) and (5) are the prerequisites to obtaining such a certificate. See § 633.35(2).

      4. The state examination requirement is the subject of Florida Administrative Code Rule 69A-37.056(6)(b) and (c), which provides as follows:

        1. State examinations, consisting of a written and a practical part, shall be administered by a Field Representative of the Bureau [of Fire Standards and Training within the Department], or designee, and shall encompass all components of the Minimum Standards Course. The applicant must attain a score of 70 percent on both the written and practical examinations to receive a certificate of compliance.


        2. The state practical examination will be administered at the local training facility.


          Whenever possible, the Bureau will schedule the state examination date at the convenience of the training facility. The written examination will be administered electronically at the local training center facility or local testing center if the training center lacks the capacity to support electronic testing.


      5. With exceptions not pertinent to the instant case, "[a]ny certified firefighter who has not been active as a firefighter, or as a volunteer firefighter with an organized fire department, for a period of 3 years shall be required to retake the practical portion of the minimum standards state examination specified in rule 69A-37.056(6)(b), Florida Administrative Code, in order to maintain her or his certification as a firefighter." § 633.352.

      6. Florida Administrative Code Rule 69A-37.0527 is the Department's "Retention of Certification" rule. It provides as

        follows:


        1. The examination for retention of certificate referenced in Section 633.352, F.S., shall be known as the retention examination. Being active as a volunteer firefighter with an organized fire department means the individual has been actively involved for a continuous period of time of not less than six months during the three-year period since certified or the certification was last renewed, or since termination from a fire department. Verification of being active shall be evidenced by documentation from the chief or ranking person of the volunteer fire department.


        2. To be eligible to participate in the retention examination, an individual shall apply on-line at www.florida statefirecollege.org, or submit to the Bureau Form DFS-K4-1308, "Application for Firefighter Certification Retention Examination", which is adopted in subsection 69A-37.039(2), F.A.C., and can be obtained where indicated in subsection 69A-37.039(1), F.A.C., which shall include a medical examination in accordance with Rule 69A- 37.037, F.A.C. An individual shall not participate in the practical examination unless a completed Form DFS-K4-1022 is on file with the Bureau.


        3. To be eligible to participate in the retention examination, an individual must submit fingerprints in accordance with Rule 69A-37.036, F.A.C.


        4. The Bureau, or its designee, will schedule the date and time for all retention examinations.


        5. Each individual will be required to wear NFPA labeled helmet, fire coat, bunker pants, boots, protective hood, self- contained breathing apparatus ("SCBA"), mask, personal alert safety system ("PASS device") and gloves. Such equipment shall be in operating condition to enter a hazardous environment and comply with the NFPA edition noted on the label, tag or design.


        6. Any individual who does not obtain a passing score of 70 percent or more on the retention examination will be permitted one opportunity to repeat the examination. The examination must be repeated within six months of the original examination or the opportunity is forfeited.


        7. Failure to pass the examination within the timeframes set forth above will result in the individual's having to successfully


        complete Firefighter training as defined in Rule 69A-37.055, F.A.C., before a new application and additional testing can occur.


      7. In the instant case, Petitioner is challenging the failing score he received on the Retention Retest.

      8. It was Petitioner's burden to prove at the final hearing held in this matter the merits of his challenge. See Espinoza v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 739 So. 2d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)("The general rule is that, apart from statute, the burden of proof is on the party asserting the affirmative of an issue before an administrative tribunal.")(citation omitted); Harac v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg.,

        484 So. 2d 1333, 1338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)("Ordinarily one who fails a licensure examination would shoulder a heavy burden in proving that a subjective evaluation by an expert is arbitrary."); Fla. Dep't of Transp. v. J.W.C. Co., Inc., 396 So. 2d 778, 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)("In accordance with the general rule, applicable in court proceedings, 'the burden of proof, apart from statute, is on the party asserting the affirmative of an issue before an administrative tribunal.'"); Sobers v. Dep't of Fin. Servs., Case No. 12-1191, 2012 Fla. Div. Adm. Hear. LEXIS 399 *6 (Fla. DOAH July 25, 2012)("Petitioner has the ultimate burden of proof to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he passed his retention examination retest,


        and that, therefore, his application to retain his firefighter certification should be approved."); and Walthour v. Dep't of

        Fin. Servs., Case No. 08-227, 2008 Fla. Div. Adm. Hear. LEXIS


        388 *17 (Fla. DOAH May 20, 2008; Fla. DFS July 1, 2008)("To prevail, Petitioner must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the Retention Examination and/or re-test was faulty or that the grading process was devoid of logic.").

      9. Petitioner, however, failed to make an appearance at the final hearing and present any evidence in support of his challenge, despite having been afforded proper notice of the hearing.

      10. Accordingly, his challenge to the Retention Retest must be denied.

RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is

RECOMMENDED that the Department of Financial Services, Division of the State Fire Marshall, enter an order denying Petitioner's challenge to the failing score he received on the Practical Examination for Retention of Firefighter Retest he took on May 17, 2012.



S

DONE AND ENTERED this 17th day of August, 2012, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


STUART M. LERNER

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 17th day of August, 2012.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Jesse Beauregard

10731 Northwest 18th Court Coral Springs, Florida 33071


Linje E. Rivers, Esquire Department of Financial Services

200 East Gaines Street, Sixth Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0333


Julie Jones, CP, FRP, Agency Clerk Department of Financial Services Division of Legal Services

200 East Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0390


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 12-002331
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 26, 2012 (Agency) Final Order filed.
Aug. 21, 2012 Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding Respondent's proposed exhibits to the agency.
Aug. 17, 2012 Recommended Order (hearing held August 17, 2012). CASE CLOSED.
Aug. 17, 2012 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Aug. 17, 2012 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 10, 2012 Respondent's Proposed Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing)
Aug. 10, 2012 Department's Pre-hearing Statement with Attached Witness and (Proposed) Exhibit List filed.
Jul. 24, 2012 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Jul. 24, 2012 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for August 17, 2012; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
Jul. 19, 2012 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Jul. 18, 2012 Letter to DOAH from J. Beauregard protesting decision made in regards to re-testing for Firefighter Certificate of Compliance filed.
Jul. 18, 2012 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Jul. 11, 2012 Initial Order.
Jul. 11, 2012 Agency referral filed.
Jul. 11, 2012 Election of Rights filed.
Jul. 11, 2012 Agency action letter filed.

Orders for Case No: 12-002331
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 26, 2012 Agency Final Order
Aug. 17, 2012 Recommended Order Recommend that challenge to failing score on the firefighter retention examination be denied, where challenger, who had the burden of proof, failed to make an appearance at the final hearing and to present evidence in support of his challenge.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer