Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VERDELL CARTER AND COURTNEY CARTER vs CITE CONDOMINIUMS ASSOCIATION, INC.; FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA, INC.; SHARON CHRISOSTOMO, PROPERTY MANAGER; AND SOO Y. CHUNG AND MYUNG S. CHUNG,, 14-005513 (2014)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 14-005513 Visitors: 32
Petitioner: VERDELL CARTER AND COURTNEY CARTER
Respondent: CITE CONDOMINIUMS ASSOCIATION, INC.; FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA, INC.; SHARON CHRISOSTOMO, PROPERTY MANAGER; AND SOO Y. CHUNG AND MYUNG S. CHUNG,
Judges: JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Middleburg, Florida
Filed: Nov. 20, 2014
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, September 4, 2015.

Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2015
Summary: The issues in this case are, one, whether Respondent unlawfully discriminated against Petitioners on the basis of their race or color in violation of the Florida Fair Housing Act; and, two, whether Respondent retaliated against Petitioners as a result of Petitioners' exercise, or attempted exercise, of a protected housing right.Respondents, separately or together, did not retaliate against Petitioners as a result of Petitioners' exercise, or attempted exercise, of a protected housing right.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


VERDELL CARTER AND COURTNEY CARTER,


Petitioners,


vs.


CITE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.; FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA, INC.; SHARON CRISOSTOMO, PROPERTY MANAGER; SOO Y. CHUNG AND MYUNG S. CHUNG,


Respondents.

/

Case No. 14-5513


SUPPLEMENTAL RECOMMENDED ORDER


This case came before Administrative Law Judge John G.


Van Laningham for final hearing by telephone conference call on


August 12, 2015.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioners: Verdell S. Carter, pro se

Courtney Carter, pro se 617 Bay Front Drive

Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 For Respondents Soo Y. Chung and Myung S. Chung:

Soo Y. Chung, pro se

5526 Southwest Seventh Avenue Road Ocala, Florida 34471


For Respondents Cite Condominium Association, Inc.; FirstService Residential Florida, Inc.; and Sharon Crisostomo:


Manuel A. Fernandez, Esquire Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. 9300 South Dadeland Boulevard, 4th Floor Miami, Florida 33156


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue in this supplemental proceeding is whether Respondents Soo Y. and Myung S. Chung, separately or together, retaliated against Petitioners as a result of Petitioners' exercise, or attempted exercise, of a protected housing right.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


In a Housing Discrimination Complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on or around August 9, 2014, and subsequently investigated by the Florida

Commission on Human Relations ("FCHR"), Petitioners Verdell and Courtney Carter alleged that Respondents had unlawfully discriminated against them on the basis of race or color by:

(a) denying or delaying services or facilities in connection with their leased dwelling, or otherwise interfering with their use and enjoyment of such dwelling; (b) refusing to accommodate an alleged disability; and (c) using coercion or other means to interfere with their exercise of protected housing rights.

The FCHR investigated Petitioners' claims and, on October 13, 2014, issued a notice setting forth its


determination that reasonable cause did not exist to believe that a discriminatory housing practice had occurred.

Thereafter, Petitioners filed a Petition for Relief, which the FCHR transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings ("DOAH") on November 17, 2014.

At the original final hearing on February 11 and 19, 2015, Verdell and Courtney Carter each testified, and they called as additional witnesses the following individuals: Julio Blanco, Maggie Oertel-Aygun, Vermyka Williams, Javariss Lawrence, Wendy Sabillon, and Sharon Crisostomo. Petitioners' Exhibits 1–15; 16-A, 16-B, 16-C, and 16-D; 17; and 18-A, 18-B, and 18-C were

received in evidence. Respondents' Exhibits 1-14 were admitted into evidence as well.

On April 27, 2015, the undersigned issued a Recommended Order, which urged the FCHR to enter a final order finding Respondent Cité Condominium Association, Inc., not liable for housing discrimination and awarding the Carters no relief.

By order dated July 9, 2015, the FCHR remanded the case to DOAH for further proceedings, to allow Petitioners to present evidence as to whether Respondents Soo Y. Chung and Myung S. Chung, or either of them, committed a discriminatory housing practice. After hearing such evidence, the undersigned would be expected to issue a Supplemental Recommended Order.


On July 10, 2015, the undersigned issued an Order Accepting Remand and Directing Parties to Respond, which, among other things, gave Petitioners until July 31, 2015, to serve and file an Amended Petition for Relief, the allegations of which were required to relate exclusively to the discriminatory housing practice(s) of which Petitioners accuse Soo Y. Chung and

Myung S. Chung.


Petitioners timely filed an amended petition. In it, they allege that Soo. Y. Chung, M.D.——who with his wife

Myung S. Chung leased Petitioners a residential unit in the Cité Condominiums in Miami, Florida, from which Petitioners eventually were evicted for nonpayment of rent——retaliated against them for having filed a Housing Discrimination Complaint with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Petitioners allege that Dr. Chung committed the following "retaliatory" acts: (1) Early termination of Petitioners' lease; (2) Threatening, in an email, that the parties would "have a difficult time" if Petitioners did not comply with

Dr. Chung's demand that they move out; (3) Failing to respond in a timely manner to Petitioners' request for repairs;

  1. Unlawfully evicting Petitioners for failure to pay rent;


  2. Requesting that an unreasonable amount of attorney's fees be awarded in the eviction proceeding; and (6) Requesting other harsh and extreme remedies in the eviction proceeding.


    At the supplemental final hearing on August 12, 2015, Verdell Carter testified, and Petitioners called Dr. Chung as a witness. Respondents Soo and Myung Chung were given until September 2, 2015, to file and serve written objections to Petitioners' Exhibits A through R. Because these Respondents did not file objections, Petitioners' Exhibits A through R are hereby received in evidence.

    Petitioners filed a Proposed Recommended Order on


    August 31, 2015, which was the previously established deadline. No other party filed a proposed recommended order.

    The court reporter's record of the supplemental final hearing has not been transcribed as of the date hereof.

    Unless otherwise indicated, citations to the official statute law of the state of Florida refer to Florida Statutes

    2014.


    FINDINGS OF FACT


    1. The undersigned adopts, and incorporates herein by this reference, the findings of fact set forth in the Recommended Order dated April 27, 2015.

    2. To repeat for emphasis, there is no persuasive evidence that any of the actions by Soo Y. Chung and Myung S. Chung, whether performed jointly or individually, including bringing


      suit to evict the Carters, were motivated by discriminatory animus or were taken to retaliate against the Carters for their exercise of a protected housing right.

    3. There is no competent, persuasive evidence in the record, direct or circumstantial, upon which a finding could be made that Soo Y. Chung and Myung S. Chung, or either of them, committed any sort of unlawful housing discrimination or retaliation.

    4. Ultimately, therefore, it is determined that neither Soo Y. Chung nor Myung S. Chung engaged in any prohibited

      activities.


      CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


    5. The undersigned adopts, and incorporates herein by this reference, the conclusions of law set forth in the Recommended Order dated April 27, 2015.

    6. To repeat for emphasis, neither Soo Y. Chung nor Myung


S. Chung is liable under section 760.37, Florida Statutes, or otherwise guilty of a prohibited practice, based on the evidence presented in this case.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the FCHR enter a final order finding Respondents Soo Y. Chung and Myung S. Chung not liable for housing discrimination and awarding the Carters no relief.


DONE AND ENTERED this 4th day of September, 2015, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S


JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 4th day of September, 2015.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Verdell S. Carter Courtney Carter

617 Bay Front Drive

Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 (eServed)


Soo Y. Chung Myung S. Chung

5526 Southwest Seventh Avenue Road Ocala, Florida 34471


Manuel A. Fernandez, Esquire Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A.

9300 South Dadeland Boulevard, 4th Floor Miami, Florida 33156

(eServed)


Tammy Scott Barton, Agency Clerk Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (eServed)


Cheyanne M. Costilla, General Counsel Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (eServed)


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 14-005513
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 03, 2015 Petitioner(s) Exception to the Administrative Law Judge Recommended Order filed.
Dec. 03, 2015 Petitioner(s) Exception to the Administrative Law Judge Supplemental Recommended Order filed.
Dec. 03, 2015 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice filed.
Sep. 21, 2015 Petitioner(s) Exception to the Administratie law Judge Supplemental Recommended Order filed.
Sep. 04, 2015 Supplemental Recommended Order. CASE CLOSED.
Sep. 04, 2015 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Aug. 31, 2015 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Aug. 21, 2015 Order Regarding Proposed Recommened Order.
Aug. 20, 2015 Letter from Soo Y. Chung regarding not ordering the transcript of the final hearing filed.
Aug. 17, 2015 Petitioner's Amended Exhibit R filed.
Aug. 13, 2015 Order of Post-hearing Instructions.
Aug. 12, 2015 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 11, 2015 Respondent's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Aug. 10, 2015 Petitioner's Exhibit R filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Petitioner's Exhibits O-Q filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Petitioner's Exhibits J-N filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Petitioner's Exhibits F-I filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Petitioner's Exhibits A-E filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Petitioners' Listing of (Proposed) Exhibits filed.
Jul. 31, 2015 Petitioners?s Amended Petition for Relief filed.
Jul. 28, 2015 Court Reporter Requested filed.
Jul. 21, 2015 Notice of Telephonic Final Hearing (hearing set for August 12, 2015; 9:00 a.m.).
Jul. 21, 2015 Respondent's Notice of Compliance with Order Accepting Remand filed.
Jul. 20, 2015 Notice of Appearance (Manuel Fernandez) filed.
Jul. 15, 2015 Petitioner's Response to the Administrative Law Judge Order Accpeting Remand and Directing Parties to Respond filed.
Jul. 14, 2015 Transcripts and Exhibits returned from the Florida Commission on Human Relations filed.
Jul. 10, 2015 Order Accepting Remand and Directing Parties to Respond.
Jul. 09, 2015 Interlocutory Order Remanding Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice filed.
Jul. 09, 2015 Petitioner(s) Exception to the Administrative Law Judge Recommended Order filed.
May 11, 2015 Petitioner(s) Exception to the Administrative Law Judge Recommended Order filed.
Apr. 27, 2015 Recommended Order (hearing held February 11 and 19, 2015). CASE CLOSED.
Apr. 27, 2015 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Apr. 13, 2015 Respondent's Notice of FilingTranscripts (not available for viewing) filed.
Apr. 06, 2015 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Mar. 27, 2015 Notice of Filing Transcript.
Mar. 26, 2015 Respondent's Notice of Filing Transcripts filed.
Mar. 26, 2015 Respondent's Proposed Final Order filed.
Mar. 06, 2015 Petitioner's Motion to Amend Petitioner?s Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 24, 2015 Petitioner?s Amended Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 20, 2015 Respondent's Notice of Filing Additional Exhibits filed.
Feb. 19, 2015 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Feb. 19, 2015 Court Reporter Requested filed.
Feb. 12, 2015 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 19, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
Feb. 11, 2015 CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to date not certain.
Feb. 10, 2015 Respondent's Notice of Filing filed.
Feb. 10, 2015 Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Feb. 09, 2015 (Petitioner?s) Amended Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 05, 2015 Respondent's Amended (Proposed) Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 05, 2015 Respondent's Amended Witness List filed.
Feb. 04, 2015 Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Feb. 03, 2015 Respondent's (Proposed) Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Feb. 02, 2015 Petitioner's (Proposed) Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 02, 2015 Petitioner's Witness List filed.
Jan. 30, 2015 Respondent's Notice of Filing Witness & (Proposed) Exhibit Lists filed.
Jan. 29, 2015 Order Denying Continuance of Final Hearing.
Jan. 28, 2015 Respondent's Objection to Petitioner's Motion for Continuance filed.
Jan. 28, 2015 Notice of Court Reporter filed.
Jan. 28, 2015 Petitioner?s Motion for Continuance filed.
Dec. 24, 2014 Certified Return Receipt received this date from the U.S. Postal Service.
Dec. 04, 2014 Certified Mail Receipts stamped this date by the U.S. Postal Service.
Dec. 04, 2014 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Dec. 04, 2014 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 11, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
Nov. 20, 2014 Housing Discrimination Complaint filed.
Nov. 20, 2014 Notice of Determination of No Cause filed.
Nov. 20, 2014 Determination filed.
Nov. 20, 2014 Petition for Relief filed.
Nov. 20, 2014 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Nov. 20, 2014 Initial Order.

Orders for Case No: 14-005513
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 03, 2015 Agency Final Order
Sep. 04, 2015 Recommended Order Respondents, separately or together, did not retaliate against Petitioners as a result of Petitioners' exercise, or attempted exercise, of a protected housing right.
Jul. 09, 2015 Agency Final Order
Apr. 27, 2015 Recommended Order Respondent did not discriminate or retaliate against Petitioners on the basis of their race or color in violation of the Florida Fair Housing Act.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer