Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KATHLEEN WILKS vs SLIPS EATERY, INC., 16-005001 (2016)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 16-005001 Visitors: 4
Petitioner: KATHLEEN WILKS
Respondent: SLIPS EATERY, INC.
Judges: G. W. CHISENHALL
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Pensacola, Florida
Filed: Aug. 30, 2016
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, November 17, 2016.

Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2017
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent, Slips Eatery, Inc. (“Slips Eatery”), violated section 760.08, Florida Statutes (2015),1/ by discriminating against Petitioner based on her disability.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that Respondent denied services to her. Thus, there was no violation of section 760.08.
TempHtml



STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


KATHLEEN


Petitioner, FCHR Case No.


v. AH No. 16-5001

SLIPS EATERY, INC., FCHR Order No.


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITIO N FOR RELIE F FROM AN UNLAWFUL PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS PRACTIC E


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Kathleen filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 509.092 and 760.01 - Florida Statutes

alleging that Respondent Slips Eatery, Inc., committed unlawful public accommodations practices on the basis of Petitioner's disability by failing to provide disabled parking spaces, by maintaining improper ramping as ingress and egress to the restaurant, and by having a round door knob on the door to the women's rest room.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on July 29,

the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful public accommodations practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal

An evidentiary hearing was held in Pensacola, Florida, on October 3, before Administrative Law Judge Garnett W. Chisenhall, Jr.

Judge Chisenhall issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated November

2016.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and

determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human

et 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 (Fla. 5th DCA Accord, Coleman v. Beach. Ocean Center Parking Garage, FCHR Order No. 14-034 (September


Filed February 13, 2017 8:00 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


et al. v. Zion's Hope, Inc., d/b/a Holy Land Experience, FCHR Order No. (June 6, and Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA. FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008).

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact.


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge's application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We find this case to be troublesome.

As indicated above, in the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider.

The Administrative Law Judge found, "Upon their arrival, Ms. noticed that Slips Eatery had no parking spaces designated for the disabled." Recommended Order,


The Administrative Law Judge set out conclusions of law containing the state law requirement that Respondent have disabled parking spaces. See Recommended Order,

33 and

However, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that the Commission did not have the authority to enforce the state law requiring disabled parking spaces.

Recommended Order, through 40. In reaching this conclusion, the Administrative Law Judge seems to take the position that Petitioner was not alleging that Respondent violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, but instead was arguing that Petitioner was violating state and federal law provisions that require parking spaces designated for the disabled. Recommended Order, and 40.

Our review of the initial Complaint and the Petition for Relief suggests to us that Petitioner was alleging violations of the Florida Civil Rights Act of See Filings.

In a case in which a hotel had closed all its "wheelchair accessible 'handicap' rooms for renovation," a Commission Panel stated, "In our view, this action could be viewed as an unlawful public accommodations practice, since '[a]ll persons shall be entitled to full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined by this chapter, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, national origin, sex, handicap, familial status, or religion.' See Section 760.08, Florida Statutes (2014)." Garratt v. Best Western Oakland Park Inn, FCHR Order No. 15-020 (March 26, (The Commission Panel ultimately found that no unlawful public accommodations practice occurred in this instance because Petitioner had reserved a "standard" room and even i f accessible rooms had existed it was still possible that such a room would not have been available i f the rooms were filled by the time Petitioner arrived at the hotel.)


Like the Petitioner in Garratt, supra, even i f parking spaces designated for the disabled existed at Respondent restaurant, it would have been possible that such a space would not have been available to Petitioner i f the spaces were filled by the time Petitioner arrived at the restaurant.

There are insufficient facts contained in the Recommended Order to disturb the Administrative Law Judge's position on the other allegations, and in the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge there is no way to determine the extent of the evidence presented on these allegations.

these comments and modifications, we adopt the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure


DONE AND ORDERED this day of , FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON


Commissioner Tony Jenkins, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Donna and

Commissioner Jay Pichard


Filed this day


in Tallahassee, Florida.


Clerk

Commission on Human Relations 4075 Esplanade Way, Room Tallahassee, FL 32399

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Kathleen

7255 Chestnut Road

Molino, FL 32577


Slips Eatery, Inc. c/o Robert Macon

Barrancas Avenue Pensacola, FL 32502


Garnett W. Chisenhall, Jr., Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a the foregoing has been mailed to the above


Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 16-005001
Issue Date Proceedings
Feb. 13, 2017 Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Public Accommodations Practice filed.
Nov. 17, 2016 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Nov. 17, 2016 Recommended Order (hearing held October 3, 2016). CASE CLOSED.
Oct. 17, 2016 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Oct. 14, 2016 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Oct. 13, 2016 CASE STATUS: Post-Hearing Conference Held.
Oct. 12, 2016 Notice of Telephonic Status Conference (status conference set for October 13, 2016; 10:00 a.m., Central Time).
Oct. 11, 2016 Petitioner's request to recuse Judge Chisenhall filed.
Oct. 03, 2016 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Sep. 30, 2016 (Amended) Court Reporter Request filed. (amended as to court reporting firm.)
Sep. 30, 2016 Court Reporter Request filed.
Sep. 29, 2016 CASE STATUS: Pre-Hearing Conference Held.
Sep. 27, 2016 Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for September 29, 2016; 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time; 10:00 a.m., Central Time).
Sep. 26, 2016 Letter to Judge Chisenhall from S. Myers regarding accommodations request filed.
Sep. 15, 2016 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Sep. 15, 2016 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 3, 2016; 1:00 p.m., Central Time; Pensacola, FL).
Sep. 14, 2016 Amended Transmittal of Petition filed.
Sep. 13, 2016 Notice of Transfer.
Sep. 12, 2016 Respondent's Reply to Initial Order and Petition for Relief filed.
Sep. 06, 2016 (Petitioner's) Letter response to the Initial Order filed.
Aug. 30, 2016 Initial Order.
Aug. 30, 2016 Public Accommodation Complaint of Discrimination filed.
Aug. 30, 2016 Notice of Determination: No Reasonable Cause filed.
Aug. 30, 2016 Determination: No Reasonable Cause filed.
Aug. 30, 2016 Petition for Relief filed.
Aug. 30, 2016 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 16-005001
Issue Date Document Summary
Feb. 09, 2017 Agency Final Order
Nov. 17, 2016 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to demonstrate that Respondent denied services to her. Thus, there was no violation of section 760.08.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer