Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RICHARD CORCORAN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs THOMAS MASTERS, 19-006071PL (2019)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 19-006071PL Visitors: 8
Petitioner: RICHARD CORCORAN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
Respondent: THOMAS MASTERS
Judges: W. DAVID WATKINS
Agency: Department of Education
Locations: St. Augustine, Florida
Filed: Nov. 14, 2019
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, April 28, 2020.

Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2020
Summary: The issues to be determined are whether Respondent, Thomas Masters, violated section 1012.795(1)(j), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 6A-10.081(2)(a)1 and 6A10.081(2)(a)5, as charged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what disciplinary penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved some, but not all, of the violations charged in the Administrative Complaint. Respondent should receive a reprimand and be placed on probation.
19006071_282_10072020_14494219_e


Before the Education Practices Commission of the State of Florida

RICHARD CORCORAN,

Commissioner of Education,


Petitioner,

DOAH CASE No. 19-6071PL

vs. EPC CASE No. 19-0318-RT

THOMAS MASTERS, PPS No. 189-0904 DOE No. 743504

Respondent. Index No.: 20-319-FOF

/


Final Order

This matter was heard by a Teacher Panel of the Education Practices Commission pursuant to Sections 1012.795, 1012.796 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, on September 3, 2020 via telephonic hearing, for consideration of the Recommended Order entered in this case by W. DAVID WATKINS, Administrative Law Judge, on April 28, 2020. Respondent was present and was represented by Heidi B. Parker, Esquire. Petitioner was represented by Ron Weaver, Esquire.

Ruling on Respondent’s Exceptions to Findings of Fact


  1. EXCEPTION 1 (Paragraphs 51 and 61 of the Recommended Order): The Commission rejected the exception because there is competent, substantial evidence to support the Administrative law Judge’s finding of fact.



    Filed October 7, 2020 2:49 PM Division of Administrative Hearings


  2. EXCEPTION 2 (Paragraphs 32 and 60 of the Recommended Order): The Commission rejected the exception because there is competent, substantial evidence to support the Administrative law Judge’s finding of fact.


    Ruling on Respondent’s Exceptions to Conclusions of Law


  3. EXCEPTION 3 (Paragraph 71 of the Recommended Order): The Commission rejected the exception because the conclusions of law were based upon facts which were established by competent, substantial evidence, which the Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence.

    Ruling on Petitioner’s Exception to Recommended Penalty


  4. EXCEPTION 4 (Recommended Penalty of the Recommended Order): The Commission rejected the exception because the recommended penalty is in within the permissible range.

    Findings of Fact


  5. The findings of fact set forth in the Recommended Order are approved and adopted and incorporated herein by reference.

  6. There is competent substantial evidence to support the findings of fact.


    Conclusions of Law


  7. The Education Practices Commission has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, and Chapter 1012, Florida Statutes.

  8. The conclusions of law set forth in the Recommended Order are approved and adopted and incorporated herein by reference.

    Penalty


    Upon a complete review of the record in this case, the Commission determines that the


    penalty recommended by the Administrative Law Judge be ACCEPTED. It is therefore


    ORDERED that:


  9. Respondent is hereby issued a letter of reprimand.


  10. Upon employment in any public or private position requiring a Florida Educator’s certificate, Respondent shall be placed on twelve (12) months employment probation with the conditions that during that period, he shall:

    1. Immediately notify the investigative office in the Department of Education upon employment or termination of employment in the state in any public or private position requiring a Florida educator’s certificate.

    2. Have Respondent’s immediate supervisor submit annual performance reports to the investigative office in the Department of Education.

    3. Pay to the Commission during the first 6 months of each probation year the administrative costs ($150) of monitoring probation assessed to the educator.

    4. Violate no law and shall fully comply with all district school board policies, school rules, and State Board of Education rules.

    5. Satisfactorily perform all assigned duties in a competent, professional manner.


    6. Bear all costs of complying with the terms of a final order entered by the Commission.

This Final Order takes effect upon filing with the Clerk of the Education Practices Commission.


DONE AND ORDERED, this 16th day of September, 2020.


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW


A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.68, FLORIDA STATUTES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS ARE GOVERNED BY THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. SUCH PROCEEDINGS ARE COMMENCED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE EDUCATION PRACTICES COMMISSION AND A SECOND COPY, ACCOMPANIED BY FILING FEES PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, OR WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE PARTY RESIDES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF RENDITION OF THIS ORDER.


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Order was mailed to Thomas Masters at 5185 Saint Ambrose Church Road, Elkton, Florida 32033 and Heidi B. Parker, Esquire, Post Office Box 2231, Orlando, FL 32802 by Certified U.S. Mail and by electronic mail to Bonnie Wilmot, Deputy General Counsel, Suite 1544, Turlington Building, 325 West Gaines Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400 and Ron Weaver, Esquire, Post Office Box 770088, Ocala, Florida 34477-0088 this 16th day of September, 2020.



COPIES FURNISHED TO:

Office of Professional Practices Services Bureau of Educator Certification Superintendent

St. Johns County Schools 40 Orange Street

St. Augustine, FL 32084-3693Timothy Frizzell Assistant Attorney General


Robert J. Telfer III Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings 1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550


Claudia Llado, Clerk

Division of Administrative Hearings


Docket for Case No: 19-006071PL
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 07, 2020 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Oct. 07, 2020 Respondent's Exceptions to the ALJ's Recommended Order filed.
Oct. 07, 2020 Agency Final Order filed.
May 12, 2020 Respondent's Exceptions to the ALJ's Recommended Order filed.
Apr. 28, 2020 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Apr. 28, 2020 Recommended Order (hearing held February 11 and 12, 2020). CASE CLOSED.
Mar. 30, 2020 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Mar. 30, 2020 Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Mar. 18, 2020 Order Granting Extension of Time.
Mar. 17, 2020 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time filed.
Mar. 09, 2020 Notice of Filing Transcript.
Mar. 09, 2020 Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Feb. 11, 2020 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Feb. 10, 2020 Respondent's Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint filed.
Feb. 10, 2020 Notice of Scheduling Court Reporter filed.
Feb. 10, 2020 Petitioner's Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint Based on Newly Discovered Evidence filed.
Feb. 07, 2020 Respondent's Second Amended Witness and Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 05, 2020 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 11 and 12, 2020; 9:00 a.m.; St. Augustine; amended as to Venue).
Feb. 05, 2020 Petitioner's Supplement to Petitioner's Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 05, 2020 Order Granting Motion to Strike Testimony of Respondent's Expert Witness.
Feb. 05, 2020 Order Granting Petitioner's Motion for Change of Hearing Location.
Feb. 05, 2020 Order Denying Petitioner's Amended Motion to Continue Final Hearing.
Feb. 04, 2020 Respondent's Amended Witness and Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 04, 2020 Notice of Telephonic Motion Hearing (motion hearing set for February 4, 2020; 1:00 p.m.).
Feb. 04, 2020 CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held.
Feb. 04, 2020 Respondent's Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Continue Final Hearing and Motion to Strike Expert Witness Testimony filed.
Feb. 04, 2020 Petitioner's Motion for Change of Hearing Location filed.
Feb. 04, 2020 Petitioner's Motion for Telephonic Motion Conference filed.
Feb. 04, 2020 Notice of Scheduling Court Reporter filed.
Feb. 03, 2020 Petitioner's Motion to Strike Testimony of Respondent's Expert Witness filed.
Feb. 03, 2020 Petitioner's Amended Opposed Motion to Continue Final Hearing filed.
Feb. 03, 2020 Joint Pre-Hearing Statement filed.
Feb. 03, 2020 Petitioner's Opposed Motion to Continue Final Hearing filed.
Feb. 03, 2020 Respondent's Witness and Exhibit List filed.
Feb. 03, 2020 Petitioner's Second Amended Witness List filed.
Feb. 03, 2020 Petitioner's Amended Witness List filed.
Jan. 28, 2020 Petitioner's Exhibit List filed.
Jan. 28, 2020 Petitioner's Witness List filed.
Jan. 27, 2020 Petitioner's Notice of Taking Deposition (Masters) filed.
Jan. 23, 2020 Respondent's Notice of Taking Depositions filed.
Jan. 10, 2020 Certificate of Service of Discovery filed.
Dec. 06, 2019 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Dec. 06, 2019 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 11 and 12, 2020; 9:00 a.m.; St. Augustine).
Nov. 25, 2019 Notice of Transfer.
Nov. 21, 2019 Notice of Appearance (Heidi Parker) filed.
Nov. 21, 2019 Amended Response to Initial Order filed.
Nov. 21, 2019 Agreed Upon Response to Initial Order filed.
Nov. 14, 2019 Initial Order.
Nov. 14, 2019 Administrative Complaint filed.
Nov. 14, 2019 Amended Election of Rights filed.
Nov. 14, 2019 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 19-006071PL
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 16, 2020 Agency Final Order
Apr. 28, 2020 Recommended Order Petitioner proved some, but not all, of the violations charged in the Administrative Complaint. Respondent should receive a reprimand and be placed on probation.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer