Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hatcher, ACM S32588 (2019)

Court: United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals Number: ACM S32588 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32588 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Ryan D. HATCHER Airman Basic (E-1), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 24 October 2019 _ Military Judge: Andrew R. Norton. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 11 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Hurlburt Field, Florida. For Appellant: Major Patrick J. Hughes, USAF. For Ap
More
                         U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
                        C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
                                      ________________________

                                          No. ACM S32588
                                      ________________________

                                         UNITED STATES
                                             Appellee
                                                   v.
                                    Ryan D. HATCHER
                         Airman Basic (E-1), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
                                      ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
                                     Decided 24 October 2019
                                      ________________________

Military Judge: Andrew R. Norton.
Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and a
reprimand. Sentence adjudged 11 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Hurlburt
Field, Florida.
For Appellant: Major Patrick J. Hughes, USAF.
For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.
Before MINK, LEWIS, and D. JOHNSON, Appellate Military Judges.
                                      ________________________

    This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under
                     AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
                                      ________________________

PER CURIAM:
    The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially
prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code
of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 1




1   Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.).
                   United States v. Hatcher, No. ACM S32588


Accordingly, the findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.


            FOR THE COURT



            CAROL K. JOYCE
            Clerk of the Court




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer