Filed: Oct. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32588 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Ryan D. HATCHER Airman Basic (E-1), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 24 October 2019 _ Military Judge: Andrew R. Norton. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 11 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Hurlburt Field, Florida. For Appellant: Major Patrick J. Hughes, USAF. For Ap
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32588 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Ryan D. HATCHER Airman Basic (E-1), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 24 October 2019 _ Military Judge: Andrew R. Norton. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 11 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Hurlburt Field, Florida. For Appellant: Major Patrick J. Hughes, USAF. For App..
More
U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
________________________
No. ACM S32588
________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Ryan D. HATCHER
Airman Basic (E-1), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
________________________
Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 24 October 2019
________________________
Military Judge: Andrew R. Norton.
Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and a
reprimand. Sentence adjudged 11 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Hurlburt
Field, Florida.
For Appellant: Major Patrick J. Hughes, USAF.
For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.
Before MINK, LEWIS, and D. JOHNSON, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under
AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
________________________
PER CURIAM:
The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially
prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code
of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 1
1 Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.).
United States v. Hatcher, No. ACM S32588
Accordingly, the findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT
CAROL K. JOYCE
Clerk of the Court
2