Filed: Jan. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1881 ARLETTA J. KUROWSKI, Mother retired tribal leader; DANIEL D. KUROWSKI HAWK, Full Time PH D Student; DEBRA J. KUROWSKI, Custodian Oneida Nation Casino; DONNA M. KUROWSKI-GALVAN, Caretaker of her mother Arletta Kurowski, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BRIAN KUROWSKI; NORMA J. KUROWSKI, Estate of, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1881 ARLETTA J. KUROWSKI, Mother retired tribal leader; DANIEL D. KUROWSKI HAWK, Full Time PH D Student; DEBRA J. KUROWSKI, Custodian Oneida Nation Casino; DONNA M. KUROWSKI-GALVAN, Caretaker of her mother Arletta Kurowski, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BRIAN KUROWSKI; NORMA J. KUROWSKI, Estate of, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. C..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1881
ARLETTA J. KUROWSKI, Mother retired tribal leader; DANIEL D. KUROWSKI
HAWK, Full Time PH D Student; DEBRA J. KUROWSKI, Custodian Oneida
Nation Casino; DONNA M. KUROWSKI-GALVAN, Caretaker of her mother
Arletta Kurowski,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BRIAN KUROWSKI; NORMA J. KUROWSKI, Estate of,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:19-cv-01494-TMC)
Submitted: January 23, 2019 Decided: January 27, 2020
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arletta J. Kurowski, Daniel D. Kurowski Hawk, Debra J. Kurowski, Donna M. Kurowski-
Galvan, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Arletta Kurowski, Daniel Kurowski Hawk, Debra Kurowski, and Donna
Kurowski-Galvan appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing their complaint without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction,
pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and the probate exception to federal jurisdiction.
See Dist. Of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,
460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid.
Trust Co.,
263 U.S. 413 (1923); Graham Shopping Ctr., LLC v. Estate of Kirsch,
777 F.3d 678, 680-81 (4th Cir. 2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. We therefore affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kurowski v.
Kurowski, No. 8:19-cv-01494-TMC (D.S.C. July 16, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2