Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: ROBERTO O. DE LEO
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Sep. 18, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, November 9, 2000.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
re
U w) oo
Fro,
“0 & te oy
STATE OF FLORIDA “p , PS
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULAYAON’S a
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD Myst, y
DIVISIONS I & II M life %
Wd,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND Os “been
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ; "
Petitioner, Case No. 98-18288
vs. . (1) - 2863 FL-
ROBERTO O. DE LEO,
Respondent.
y°
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
REGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint
before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against ROBERTO
O. DE LEO, ("Respondent"), and says:
\ 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
‘the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida
Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material
hereto, a Certified Roofing Contractor, in the State of Florida,
having been issued license number CC C056659.
3. Respondent is, and has been at all times material
hereto, a Certified General Contractor, in the State of Florida,
having been issued license number CG C046414.
4. Respondent's last known address and address of record is
8230 S.W. 62 Court, Miami, Florida 33143.
U UW
5. At all material times hereto, Respondent was licensed
as qualifying agent for MIAMI ROOFING CONTRACTOR’S COMPANY
(hereinafter referred to as “Contractor), and as such was
responsible for the acts, omissions, and financial conduct of the
business as it relates to contracting.
6. Contractor is a Florida Corporation, assigned
Corporation Number P95000085244 by the Florida Department of
State, Division of Corporations.
7. On or about February 19, 1997, Contractor contracted
with CARLOS MARTINEZ and MARIA WHITE (hereinafter WHITE) to do a
roof project on WHITE’S residence located at 8320 Nw 180‘"
Street, Hialeah, Florida. —
8. The contract price was $4,480.00.
9. The contract referred to the name of Contractor as MIAMI
ROOFING CO., however Contractor was not legally authorized by the
‘Florida Department of State to conduct business under said name
as either a corporation or fictitious name. Furthermore, the
said contract as well as the building permit application
contained Respondent’s certified roofing contractor license
number.
10. Contractor obtained Building Permit No. 97052256 from
Metropolitan Dade County Building and Zoning Department for the
project.
11. WHITE paid Contractor $4,032.00. Pursuant to the
terms of the contract, the remaining $448.00 was due upon
U 7]
completion of the work.
12. The aforesaid project was never completed by Contractor
in that the work performed by Contractor failed a required final ;
inspection by the aforesaid building and zoning department on or
about April 17, 1997.
13. Contractor performed no work on the job since at or
about the time of the failed final inspection thereby abandoning
it without just cause and without proper notification to WHITE.
Contractor has failed to perform work without just cause for at
least 90 consecutive days.
14. As a result of Respondent’s failed final inspection and
abandonment, WHITE was required to hire another Contractor to I
complete the project and obtain a passing final inspection. The
total cost to WHITE to complete the project as adjusted for
thange orders, if any, was $5,632.00, which is $1,152.00 more :
‘than the price contracted with Contractor. Such increase in cost
was not the result of circumstances beyond the control of the
contractor, was not the result of circumstances caused by the
customer, or was not otherwise permitted by the terms of the
contract between the contractor and customer. |
|
15. Respondent did not visit the job site and was not
otherwise involved in the contracted project. Respondent was
also not involved in the business operations or the financial
matters of Contractor.
|
| |
|
|
wo] WW
16. Chapter 489.1195 (1) (a), Florida Statutes (1997),
provides that all qualifying agents for a business organization
are jointly and equally responsible for supervision of all
operations of the business organization; for all field work at
all sites; and for financial matters, both for the organization
in general and for each specific job. .
17. Chapter 489.1425 (1), Florida Statutes (1997), provides
that any agreement or contract for repair, restoration,
improvement, or construction to residential real property must
contain a written statement explaining the consumer's rights
under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund, except where the
value of all labor and materials does not exceed $2,500.00. The
aforesaid contract failed to include the required written
statement.
\
COUNT I
18. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through seventeen as though fully set
forth in this Count I.
19. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter
489.129(1)(j), Florida Statutes (1997) by failing in any material
respect to comply with the provisions of Part 1, Chapter 489,
Florida Statutes by violating Chapter 489.1195 Florida statutes
(1997), by failing to supervise all field work at all sites and
financial matters and business operations for each specific job
,
f
t
i
|
\
i
|
|
|
U UW
and for Contractor's company.
COUNT II
20. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through nineteen as though fully set
forth in this Count II.
21. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter
489.129(1) (9g), Florida Statutes (1997), by acting in the capacity
of a contractor under any certificate or registration issued
under Chapter 489, Florida Statutes, except in the name of the
certificateholder or registrant as set forth on the issued
certificate or registration, or in accordance with the personnel
of the certificateholder ox registrant as set forth in the
application for the certificate or registration, or as later
changed as provided in this part.
\ i
\
COUNT III
22. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through twenty-one as though fully
set forth in this Count iil.
23. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter
489.129(1) (p), Florida Statutes (1997) by proceeding on any job
without obtaining applicable local building department permits
and inspections.
U U
COUNT IV
24. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through twenty-three as though fully
set forth in this Count IV.
25. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter
489.129(1) (h)3, Florida Statutes (1997) by committing
mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that
causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or
misconduct occurs when the contractor’s job has been completed,
and it is shown that the customer has had to pay more for the
contracted job than the original contract price, as adjusted for
subsequent change orders, unless such increase in cost was the
result of circumstances beyond the control of the contractor, was
the result of circumstances caused by the customer, or was
otherwise ipermitted by the terms of the contract between the
tontractor and customer.
COUNT _V
26. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through twenty-five as though fully
set forth in this Count V.
27. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter
489.129(1) (k), Florida Statutes (1997), by abandoning a
construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed to be
abandoned after 90 days if the contractor terminates the project
WU wo]
without just cause or without proper notification to the owner,
including the reason for termination, or fails to perform work
without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT VI
28. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through twenty-seven as though fully
set forth in this Count.VI.
29. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter
—489.129(1) (3), Florida Statutes (1996 Supp.) by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of Part 1, Chapter
489, Florida Statutes by violating Chapter 489.1425 (1), Florida
Statutes (1997) in failing to include a statement in the contract
explaining the Construction Industries Recovery Fund.
\ WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the
Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing one
or more of the following penalties: place on probation, reprimand
the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the
certificate or registration, require financial restitution to a
consumer, impose an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per
violation, require continuing education, assess costs associated
with investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties
delineated within Section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any
other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to
Chapters 489, 455, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated
thereunder.
Signed this P
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Michael D. Soifer
Senior Attorney
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Rhode Bldg., Phase II
401 NW 2° Street, N607
Miami, Florida 33128-1765
MDS
‘December 15, 1999
‘Case #98-18288
CohKL & Dow
By: Cathleen 0’ Dowd
Lead Attorney
(PeP) Jan 25, acco
aay of Fe Arvany , 2000
Division I : : Gene Simmons | Paul MEKidtriek
Division IL : Keith Laws
FILED
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
DEPUTY CLERK :
. pene vel
S0n Sr] Richard T. Cou
Docket for Case No: 00-003863PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Nov. 09, 2000 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Nov. 08, 2000 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction without Prejudice (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Sep. 28, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Sep. 28, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing issued. (hearing set for November 17, 2000, 9:00 a.m., Miami, FL.)
|
Sep. 28, 2000 |
Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 00-003862PL, 00-003863PL)
|
Sep. 26, 2000 |
Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 25, 2000 |
Response to Initial Order filed by Respondent.
|
Sep. 18, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Sep. 18, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2000 |
Agency referral filed.
|