Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF FUNERAL DIRECTORS AND EMBALMERS
Respondent: JOHN RICHARD KNAPIK
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Nov. 20, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, February 23, 2001.
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA spy
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ea 38
BOARD OF FUNERAL DIRECTORS AND ENpAKOERS
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
vs. Case Number 99-05927
JOHN RICHARD KNAPIK,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
(Petitioner), files this Administrative Complaint against JOHN RICHARD KNAPIK,
(Respondent), and says:
1. The Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of funeral
directing and embalming, operation of funeral establishments, and regulation of direct
disposition and cinerator operation, pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and
Chapters 455 and 470, Florida Statutes.
2. The Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a licensed funeral .
director and embalmer in the State of Florida, having been issued license number FE
0002490.
3. The Respondent's last known mailing address is 57 Cayuga Road, Sea Ranch
Lakes, FL 33308-2928,
4. At all times material hereto the Respondent was a funeral director and embalmer and
the operator in charge of Gulf Crematory.
5. At all times material hereto Gulf Crematory was a licensed cinerator facility, licensed
pursuant to license number FC 0000181, and located at or about 410 Whitney Avenue, Lantana,
FL 33462. |
6. As the operator in charge of the cinerator facility, the Respondent was responsible for .
making sure the facility, its operations, and all persons employed in the facility complied with all
applicable state and federal laws and rules. |
7. Gulf Crematory's functions involved picking up dead human bodies, having the bodies
cremated, and then returning them to the funeral home that requested the cremation.
8. On or about the late evening of June 1, 1999, Gulf Crematory was damaged by fire.
9. The fire damaged the refrigeration and electrical capacity of the cinerator facility, and
as a result the Respondent shipped the approximately 49 dead human bodies that were at Gulf
Crematory at the time of the fire, to another crematory, Allen and Shaw, on or between June 2-4,
1999, for purposes of cremation.
10. Between June 2, 1999, and September of 1999, the Respondent and/or Gulf
Crematory kept accepting dead human bodies for cremation, and took-the bodies to other
licensed facilities for cremation. Following the cremation, Gulf Crematory and/or the
Respondent would return and retrieve the cremains of the dead human bodies, and transport them
back to the funeral home that hired them for cineration purposes.
Allen and Shaw Crematory
11. Between June 2, 1999, and September of 1999, the Respondent and/or Gulf
Crematory transported hundreds of bodies to Allen and Shaw Crematory, and also transported
some remains to ABCO Crematory.
12. Allen and Shaw is a licensed cinerator facility, located at or about 13931 N.W. 20"
Court, Opa-Locka, Miami, Dade County, Florida, and is owned by Verl Shaw.
13. When the initial 49 bodies were delivered to Allen and Shaw on or between June 2-4,
1999, four of the bodies were either unidentified or inadequately identified, and did not have a
transit permit accompanying the body during shipment and/or delivery.
14. Mr. Shaw tried throughout June of 1999 to get the bodies identified properly, but had
no success. .
15. On or about July 21, 1999, Department of Business and Professional Investigation
(D.B.P.R.) Investigator (Inv.) Matthew Drummet, met the Respondent at Allen and Shaw to look
at the bodies that were not properly identified, and observed the following deficiencies in
identification of the bodies, and/or failure to have a burial transit permit:
a) Human remains of infant Keyonta Weaver- The body of this infant was ina box,
that stated only: MeWhite, 11/28/98, Plantation General. The infant did have an identifying tag
around its waist, stating only "Weaver". There was no burial transit permit with the body, nor
was there a burial transit permit with the body when it was delivered by the Respondent and/or
Gulf Crematory to Allen and Shaw.
b) Human remains later identified as Efrain Castro- The remains of Mr. Castro
were not identified in any manner, or with any type of tag affixed, and the box that the remains
were in only stated: Henry Julme, Emanual F.H., 3/18. Henry Julme was the name of the
decedent's physician, and Emanual F.H. was the name of the funeral home handling the final
arrangements. There was no burial transit permit with Mr. Castro's remains when they were
delivered by the Respondent and/or Gulf Crematory to Allen and Shaw.
c) Human remains of Florence Baginski- The remains of Florence Baginski were
not marked in any manner, or with any identifying tag affixed to her remains. Her name was
written on the end of the box she was transported in, and there was no burial transit permit
accompanying the body at the time it was delivered by the Respondent and/or Allen and Shaw.
d) Human remains of Robert Princilus- The remains of Mr. Princilus were not
marked in any manner, but a toe tag was later found, not with the body. There was no burial
transit permit accompanying the body at the time it was delivered by the Respondent and/or
Allen and Shaw.
16. None of the four bodies were accompanied by a required completed burial-transit
permit, issued in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 382, Florida Statutes, at they time
they were transported and delivered to Allen and Shaw.
17. The four human remains did not have a tag or other means of proper identification
that was encased in or consisted of durable and long-lasting material containing the name, date of
birth, date of death, and social security number of the deceased.
18. At the time of removal and/or transportation of the four dead human bodies to Allen
and Shaw, the Respondent failed to ensure that the remains were identified by a tag or other
means of identification affixed to the ankle or wrist of the deceased.
Additional Improperly Identified Bodies at Allen and Shaw
19, In or around July and August of 1999, three additional dead human bodies were
. transported to Allen and Shaw by the Respondent and/or Gulf Crematory.
20. The three dead human remains were transported to Allen and Shaw for cremation.
21. None of the three dead human remains were accompanied by a burial transit
permit.
22. None of the three dead human remains were marked by use of a tag or other
appropriate marking.
23. Instead, the three dead human remains were marked by the Respondent and/or by
Gulf Crematory by means of having their respective names and the name of the funeral
establishment that they were taken from written on their legs in black marker, as follows:
a) the dead human remains of Marian Blackburn were identified by black marker on her
left leg stating "MARIAN BLACKBURN", and marker writings on her right leg stating "ALL
FAMILY." The remains had no other identifying markings upon arrival at Allen and Shaw.
b) The remains of Dorothy Kaplon were identified by black marker on the decedent's left
leg stating "DOROTHY KAPLON", and on the right leg by "ALL FAMILY 7/29/99". The
remains also had an identifying anklet.
c) The remains of Hyman Buslo were received on July 15, 1999. His remains were
identified by means of black magic marker on his left leg stating "HYMAN BUSLO" and
markings on his right leg stating funeral home information.
FACTS ON INSURANCE FRAUD
24, The Respondent agreed to pay Verle Shaw, owner of Allen and Shaw, $100.00 for
each dead human body that was cremated by Allen and Shaw on behalf of the Respondent and/or
Gulf Crematory. |
25. The Respondent had an insurance policy on Gulf Crematory, which for business
purposes was also sometimes referred to by the Respondent, as Palm Beach Funeral Services,
Inc., pursuant to policy number 0035385151 with Great Northern Insurance Company (Chubb
Group), that included a business income and/or extra expense coverage.
26. This coverage provided that Great Northem Insurance would pay for expenses
incurred by Gulf Crematory to continue to operate their business through other means while the
damaged location was inoperable
27. After Allen and Shaw had cremated approximately 100 dead human bodies for the
Respondent, and/or Gulf Crematory, the Respondent asked Verle Shaw to lie about the amount
he was charging for the cremations, so that the Respondent could obtain additional money from
his insurance company.
28. The Respondent asked Mr. Shaw to submit false bills to the Respondent and/or Gulf
Crematory, falsely inflating the charge per cremation from the $100.00 agreed upon between the
parties, to $150.00 per cremation.
29. The Respondent told Mr. Shaw that he needed Mr. Shaw to submit the false and
inflated bills, so that the Respondent could obtain the extra $50.00 per cremation from his
insurance company, and keep this extra money to pay off bills.
30. On or about June 23, 1999, the Respondent told Mr. Shaw that unless he submitted
the falsely inflated bills, that the Respondent would not be able to pay him at all for the
cremations.
31. Mr. Shaw initially refused to submit false paperwork. Subsequently, in July of
1999, the Respondent contacted the State of Florida Division of Insurance Fraud (Division), and
after consulting with the Division, he complied with the Respondent's request that he submit
falsely inflated bills. |
32. On or about Tune 29, 1999, the Respondent and Mr. Shaw discussed the submission
of falsely inflated invoices during a telephone call that was tape recorded by the Division, and
the Respondent admitted that the submission of false invoices would be fraudulent.
33. In July of 1999, Mr. Shaw submitted copies of invoices (13 pages) for the period
beginning June 2, 1999 and ending July 10, 1999 to Gulf Crematory and/or the Respondent. The
invoices falsely stated that the cost per body for cremation was $150.00 and reflected a total of
165 bodies cremated at the request of the Respondent and/or Gulf Crematory, for a total cost of
$24,750.00.
34. After receiving the invoices from Mr. Shaw, the Respondent and/or Gulf Crematory,
and/or the Respondent's wife, Gloria Knapik, acting with the knowledge of the Respondent,
submitted the falsely inflated invoices to Great Northern Insurance with a request for payment of
$24,750.00.
35. The invoices submitted to Great Norther reflected an inflated cost of $8,250.00.
36. Subsequent to the submission of the invoices for the $24,950.00, Mr. Shaw, again
acting at the request of the Respondent, submitted additional false invoices for cremation charges
for an additional 97 cremations performed by Allen and Shaw at the request of the Respondent.
37. The additional false invoices were for approximately $14,625.00, with an inflated
amount of approximately $4,850.00 (fifty dollars inflation per cremation).
PREMIER FUNERAL SERVICES REMAINS
38. On or about July 20, 1999, The Respondent met Inv. Drummet at licensed funeral
establishment, Premier Funeral Services, Inc., where the Respondent had taken two dead human
bodies for storage and/or embalming.
39. Neither body was identified, neither were accompanied by burial transit permits and
one of the decedents, Ronald Williams was in a dirty and/or used body bag, which was labeled
with a tag identifying the remains as "William C. Massey".
40. The remains were not of William C. Massey, but of Ronald Williams.
41. Neither of the two dead human bodies were accompanied by a required completed
burial-transit permit, issued in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 382, Florida Statutes.
42. The two dead human remains did not have a tag or other means of proper
identification that was encased in or consisted of durable and long-lasting material containing the
name, date of birth, date of death, and social security number of the deceased.
43. At the time of removal and/or transportation of the two dead human bodies, the
Respondent failed to ensure that the remains were identified by a tag or other means of
identification affixed to the ankle or wrist of the deceased.
ABCO CREMATORY
44. On or between July 19, 1999, and July 21, 1999, the Respondent transported several 7
bodies to a licensed crematory, ABCO Crematory, for the purpose of having them cremated. On
several occasions he delivered bodies without the required burial transit permits.
45. On several occasions in July of 1999, the Respondent delivered dead human bodies
to ABCO Crematory for the purpose of having them cremated, and the bodies that were
delivered were only marked with a toe tag, and no other identifying marking.
46. The Respondent would send the burial transit permits by facsimile over to ABCO
Crematory within a few days after the bodies were delivered.
COUNT I
47. The Petitioner incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one through
forty-six as though fully set forth in this Count I.
48. Section 470.0315, Florida Statutes, provides that a dead human body may be
transported only when accompanied by a properly completed burial-transit permit issued in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 382, Florida Statutes.
49. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of having violated Section
470.036(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by violating a provision of Chapter 470, Florida Statutes, to wit:
violation of Section 470.0315, Florida Statutes by failing to have burial transit permits on
Keyonta Weaver, Efrain Castro, Florence Baginski, and/or Robert Princilus, and/or other dead
human bodies transported to Allen and Shaw crematory.
COUNT
50. The Petitioner incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one through
forty-six as though fully set forth in this Count II.
51. Section 470.0355(1), Florida Statute, requires that the licensee or registrant in
charge of the final disposition of dead human remains shall, prior to final disposition of such
dead human remains, affix on the ankle or wrist of the deceased, or in the casket or
alternative container or cremation container, proper identification of the dead human
remains. The identification or tag shall be encased in or consist of durable and long-lasting
material containing the name, date of birth, date of death, and social security number of the
deceased, if available Ifthe dead human remains are cremated, proper identification shall be
placed in the container or urn containing the remains. |
52. Section 470.0355(2), Florida Statutes, provides that any licensee or registrant
responsible for removal of dead human remains to any establishment, facility, or location
shall ensure that the remains are identified by a tag or other means of identification that is
affixed to the ankle or wrist of the deceased at the time the remains are removed from the
place of death or other location.
53. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of having violated Section
470.036(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by violating a provision of Chapter 470, Florida Statutes, to
wit: violation of Section 470.0355(1) and/or 470.0355(2), Florida Statutes by failing to
properly identify the remains of Keyonta Weaver, Efrain Castro, Florence Baginski, and/or.
Robert Princilus.
COUNT OI
54.. The Petitioner incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one through
forty-six as though fully set forth in this Count III.
55. Section 470.0315, Florida Statutes, provides that a dead human body may be
transported only when accompanied by a properly completed burial-transit permit issued in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 382, Florida Statutes.
56. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of having violated Section
470.036(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by violating a provision of Chapter 470, Florida Statutes, to
wit: violation of Section 470.0315, Florida Statutes by failing to have burial transit permits
accompanying dead human bodies that were transported to Premier Funeral Services, Inc.
COUNT IV
57. The Petitioner incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one through
forty-six as though fully set forth in this Count IV.
58. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of having violated Section
470.036(1)(g), Florida Statutes, by committing fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetency, or
misconduct in the practice of funeral directing.
COUNT V
59. The Petitioner incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one through
forty-six as though fully set forth in this Count V.
10
60. Section 455.227(1)(m), Florida Statutes, provides that the following acts shall
constitute grounds for which the disciplinary actions specified in subsection 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, may be taken: making deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations in
or related to the practice of a profession or employing a trick or scheme in or related to the
practice of a profession
61. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of having violated Section
470.036(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by violating a provision of Chapter 455, Part I, Florida
Statutes, to wit: violation of Section 455.227(1)(m), Florida Statutes, by committing
insurance fraud.
COUNT VI
62 The Petitioner incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one through
forty-six as though fully set forth in this Count VI.
63. Section 470.0315(4), Florida Statutes, requires that all dead human remains that
are transported or stored must be completely covered and at all times treated with dignity
and respect. .
64. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 470.036( 1)(h),
Florida Statutes, by violating a provision of Chapter 455, Part I, to wit: violation of Section
470.0315(4), Florida Statutes by failing to treat dead human remains with dignity and
respect as evidence by writing, and/or permitting and/or authorizing writing on the legs of
decedent's Marian Blackburn, Dorothy Kaplon, and/or Hyman Buslo, as a means of marking
their bodies.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of Funeral Directors
and Embalmers enter an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: revocation
11
or suspension of the Respondent’s license, restriction of the Respondent’s practice,
imposition of an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per violation, issuance of a
reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, assessment of costs associated with -
investigation and prosecution, imposition of any or all penalties delineated within Sections
455.227(2) and 470.036(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is
authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 455, and/or 470, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules
Signed this / Y day of Me 2000..
ae
y+ ‘THOMAS’G. THOMAS
Chief Attorney
promulgated thereunder.
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Elizabeth Masters, Senior Attorney
Florida Bar Number 401640
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
1940 N. Monroe Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
Case #99-07547 F | LED
P Dote ! a-1D- Department of Business and Professional Regulation
2c | te a 1-00 ’ DEPUTY CLERK ,
Rosiee ¥ Coleman
DATE A- Aq -2000
12
Docket for Case No: 00-004723PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 27, 2001 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel (filed by C. Tunnicliff via facsimile).
|
Feb. 23, 2001 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Feb. 22, 2001 |
Emergency Agreed Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
|
Feb. 14, 2001 |
Amended Notice of Video Teleconference issued. (hearing scheduled for February 27, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale and Tallahassee, FL, amended as to video and location).
|
Jan. 25, 2001 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for February 27, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Jan. 12, 2001 |
Agreed Motion for Continuance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Dec. 01, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Dec. 01, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for January 30, 2001; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Nov. 30, 2000 |
Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Nov. 22, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Nov. 20, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2000 |
Agency referral filed.
|