Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: MANOR CARE OF BOYNTON BEACH, INC., D/B/A MANOR CARE HEALTH SERVICES
Judges: LAWRENCE P. STEVENSON
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Fort Myers, Florida
Filed: Mar. 18, 2003
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, August 4, 2003.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR ef
PMEMGS
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, O cor O72
AHCA NO: 2002048939
vs.
MANOR CARE OF BOYNTON BEACH, INC.,
d/b/a MANOR CARE HEALTH SERVICES,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(hereinafter “AHCA”), by and through the undersigned counsel,
and files this Administrative Complaint against MANOR CARE OF
BOYNTON BEACH, INC., d/b/a MANOR CARE HEALTH SERVICES
(hereinafter “Respondent”) and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose a conditional licensure
status effective October 17, 2002, pursuant to Sections
400.23(7) (b) and 400.23(8) (b). The original conditional license
is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
2. The Respondent was cited for the deficiency during the
annual survey conducted on or about October 14-17, 2002.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. The Agency has jurisdiction over the Respondent
pursuant to Chapter 400, Part II, Florida Statutes.
4. Venue lies in Lee County, Division of Administrative
Hearings, pursuant to 120.57 Florida Statutes, and Chapter 28-
106.207, Florida Administrative Code.
PARTIES
5. AHCA, is the enforcing authority with regard to
nursing home licensure law pursuant to Chapter 400, Part II,
Florida Statutes and Rules 59A-4, Florida Administrative Code.
6. Respondent is a nursing home located at 13881 Eagle
Ridge Drive, Fort Myers, Florida 33912. The facility is
licensed under Chapter 400, Part II, Florida Statutes and
Chapter 59A-4, Florida Administrative Code.
COUNT I
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 17, 2002, AHCA ASSIGNED A CONDITIONAL
LICENSURE STATUS TO THE RESPONDENT BASED UPON THE DETERMINATION
THAT THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH
APPLICABLE LAWS AND RULES DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF ONE (1) CLASS
II DEFICIENCY AT THE MOST RECENT SURVEY OF OCTOBER 14-17, 2002.
§400.23(7), Fl. Stat. (2002)
FIRST CLASS II DEFICIENCY
7. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates (1) through (6) as if
fully set forth herein.
8. On or about October 14-17, 2002 an annual survey was
conducted at the facility.
9. On that date, based on based on record review,
observations, and interviews with family member and facility
staff, the facility failed to provide necessary care and
services for Resident #7, (1 of 20 active, sampled residents),
who is severely cognitively impaired.
The findings include:
9.1 Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on
7/29/02 with diagnoses including S$/P (Status Post) Hip Fracture,
Alzheimer's disease, (UTI) Urinary Tract Infection, Atrial
Fibrillation, and Interstitial Lung Disease. The History and
Physical of 7/31/02 lists current meds to be Lanoxin, Aricept,
Zyprexia, and Nitropaste. The report stated that the resident
had no lower extremity edema. The report further confirmed that
this resident was upper "edentulous, lower few remaining teeth
and with oral mucosa pink, moist." Admission weight of this
resident was recorded to be 109 pounds. A physician's order of
8/04/02 specified the diet to be changed from Regular
Consistency to Ground Enhanced with House Supplement TID (three
times daily). During the months of August and September the
resident suffered from UTIs. Lab tests confirm these infections
on 8/14/02, 9/04/02, and 9/23/02. Appropriate ABT (antibiotic
therapy) was administered with each infection.
9.2 After admission to the facility the resident
encountered a severe weight loss of 14.7% of body weight (from
109 Pounds on 8/5 to 93 pounds on 10/09/02). Nursing notes
during this time frame describe the resident as resistive to
care with frequent refusals of medications, meals, fluids, and
showers. The resident's weight had increased to 98.8 pounds on
the third day of the survey when the surveyor requested a
current weight. Facility staff during interview on 10/16
attributed the weight gain to the resolution of the UTIs.
9.3 Laboratory values of 8/26/02 report a BUN
elevated at 22 (desirable range 7 to 17), Creatinine within
normal range at 0.8, a BUN/Creatinine Ratio of 27.5 (values
above 25 indicate possible dehydration), and a decreased
moderately depleted visceral protein status indicated by an
Albumin of 3.1 (desirable 3.5 to 5.0). Additional lab values of
9/17/02 documented an increased BUN of 31, a normal Creatinine
of 0.9, a BUN/Creatinine Ratio of 34.4 indicating possible
dehydration, and a still depleted Albumin of 3.0. At this time
a physician's order was obtained to encourage fluids: 600 cc
every 8 hours. Also on this date a problem of "At Risk for
Dehydration and UTI was added to the care plan. At an
undeterminable date the problem of At Risk for Dehydration had
been discontinued on the care plan when it was reviewed by the
surveyor and copied on 10/15/02. When the surveyor on 10/16/02
once again reviewed the care plan, the problem of "At Risk for
Dehydration" again appeared on the care plan with no indication
as to when this problem had again become a concern. In addition
the care plan, which was apparently updated, on 10/16/02
reflected the approach of "Provide assistance with reposition &
for comfort."
9.4 The RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument)
completed on 8/09/02 as an Admission Assessment coded the
resident to be severely cognitively impaired, resistive to care,
and requiring moderate to total physical assistance with ADLS
(Activities of Daily Living).
The most current RAI completed as a significant change on
10/07/02 coded the resident as severely cognitively impaired,
resistive to care, and requiring moderate to total care with
ADLs with the exception of eating which is coded as Independent
with Set-Up help only required. However, the October charting
by the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) document that with
eating, this resident requires, “hands on limited assistance
with one person physical assist at the evening meal for the days
of October 1 through October 14 while being independent
requiring set-up help only for breakfast and lunch on the same
dates. The offerings of food and hydration are documented as
"y" instead of number of offerings approximately 50% of the
time. Meal intake is recorded as varying between 0 and 25%. A
Diet Communication Form dated 8/12/02 specified that the
resident would eat in the Colony Dining Room at the second
seating as a part of the Restorative Dining Program. An undated
Diet Communication Form designates that the resident is to have
lunch and dinner meals in the Edison Dining Room. The staff
serving residents in this dining room related to the surveyor on
10/15/02 that Resident #7 was still on Restorative Dining even
though she was now designated to eat in the Edison Dining Room.
9.5 The Monthly Nursing Summary dated 10/13/02 states
that oral intake is 25 to 50% that she needs encouragement and
verbal cues when eating, and eats in the dining room. Dietary
notes of 10/08 and 10/10/02 document that the resident eats all
meals in her room because it is "her preference."
9.6 On 10/15/02, the surveyor observed this
resident's meal to be delivered to her room at approximately
8:10 A.M. The tray was left on the sleeping resident's over bed
table with the meal still covered, milk cartons (2) unopened, no
syrup or butter on the pancake, super cereals (2) remained
covered, orange juice unopened. At 8:25 A.M., the resident
remained sleeping with tray untouched. The roommate who was
eating her breakfast stated that the resident liked to sleep
late, that her tray was always left while she was sleeping in
the mornings, no care was rendered before Breakfast to either
resident, and that Resident #7 always has to wait for assistance
to be rendered - if ever rendered. At 9:10 A.M., no staff had
returned to the room to assist the resident with tray set-up or
with AM care. The resident was observed to have opened a carton
of chocolate milk and was drinking directly from the carton as
no straw was on the tray. The food was cold and remained
untouched. At 10:15 A.M., the resident was again sleeping,
still in hospital gown stained with chocolate with no apparent
AM care given. A peanut butter and jelly sandwich was observed
to be wrapped and on the over bed table along with a banana and
chocolate milk. The breakfast tray had been removed. At 11:15
A.M., the resident was observed to be eating the banana while
the sandwich remained wrapped. At 11:45 A.M., the resident was
sleeping, the sandwich was still wrapped, and * of the chocolate
milk had been drunk.
At 12:20 P.M., on the same day the resident's lunch tray was
delivered to her room. Staff left the tray with no interaction
with the resident and with no set-up. The resident was eating a
slice of bread she had removed from the sandwich. She remained
in a soiled hospital gown. Her hands were soiled with food
debris and her fingernails were long and encrusted with debris.
Lunch consisted of 2 containers of chocolate milk and a peanut
butter and jelly sandwich. At 12:50 P.M., a staff member was
observed to enter the room and take the roommate to the dining
room for the noon meal. The staff member did not acknowledge
Resident #7 in any fashion. The resident was eating the
sandwich and drinking from a carton on chocolate milk without
the benefit of a straw. This resident remained in a soiled
hospital gown and was eating with dirty fingers and dirty hands.
At 1:10 P.M., the resident's hands were soiled with peanut
butter and jelly, as was the hospital gown. The resident had
eaten the sandwich and consumed 1 carton of the milk. The other
carton remained unopened on the over bed table.
9.7 While reviewing the resident's clinical record
the surveyor noted that the resident was on a Restorative
Ambulation Program and had a physician order dated 9/30/02 for
ambulation 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Review of the form for
Restorative Ambulation revealed that the resident had been
ambulated on 4 occasions in October with 1 refusal. At 2:10
P.M. on 10/15/02, the Restorative Aide was interviewed. This
Aide stated that the resident was not usually combative and
enjoyed walking. At 2:30 P.M., the resident was observed to be
ambulating with the Aide. This resident was smiling, waving to,
and joking with staff members in the hallway.
9.8 The following day, 10/16/02, at the breakfast
meal at 8:35 A.M., the resident's tray was placed on the over
bed table. The resident was awakened and told that her
breakfast was here. The resident stated to the CNA that she was
still sleepy and wanted to eat later. The CNA stated that she
would come back in 10 minutes to assist with eating. The
resident stated, "Make that 15 minutes." The CNA said she would
return later and exited the room. However, she immediately came
back into the room and proceeded to set-up the tray and talk to
the resident. The resident was now asleep. The tray consisted
of scrambled eggs, 2 super cereals, a Danish, orange juice, 1
container of chocolate milk and a Nu Basic milkshake. The tray
card stated that the resident was to receive 2 containers of
chocolate milk and the Nu Basic had been discontinued by
physician order on 10/10/02 due to "poor intake. Too sweet."
Even though the supplement had been discontinued, it appeared as
an approach on the current care plan in the entries of chocolate
Nu Basic Plus with meals and Nu Basic three times daily. The
resident was observed to be sleeping at 8:45 A.M., at 8:55 A.M.
and at 9:20 A.M. At 9:20 A.M., the tray had been removed from
the room.
9.9 At 9:25 A.M., the CNA who had delivered the meal
was asked if she assisted the resident to eat. The CNA stated
that the resident had eaten a few bites. The tray was found on
a lateral cart in the hallway. The orange juice was unopened,
no chocolate milk had been drunk, and only a few bites of the
Danish were gone.
9.10 At 11:35 A.M., the resident was observed to be in
bed, but dressed. An unwrapped uneaten sandwich was present on
the over bed table along with a container of Nu Basic witha
straw, and a half-eaten banana. Upon seeing the surveyor, the
resident exclaimed, "I am ready to get up." When asked if she
would like to go to the dining room to eat her meal the resident
replied, "Yes, that would be nice. Would you take me?"
9.11 At 2:45 P.M., a sandwich, banana, and Nu Basic
were present on the resident's over bed table. The sandwich was
untouched and still wrapped. At 3:20 P.M., the snack remained
untouched.
Also enumerated on the care plan as approaches for the problem
of weight loss were:
Super foods at each meal, house supplements three times daily
(which were discontinued on 10/10/02), assist with meals,
encourage intake, peanut butter and jelly sandwich three times
daily, chocolate milk at 10 A.M., 2 P.M., and 8 P.M., peanut
butter and jelly sandwich for lunch and dinner, and banana at 10
A.M., 2 P.M., and HS (Hours of Sleep). The physician on 9/24/02
as a family request three times daily had ordered the peanut
butter and jelly sandwich. The peanut butter and jelly
sandwiches with soup for lunch and dinner per resident request
were added to the care plan on 10/01/02. The resident did not
receive the enhanced soup for lunch on the second day of the
survey, only the sandwich.
9.12 At 12:15 P.M., Resident #7 was observed to be up
in her wheelchair, dressed and ready to go to the dining room.
She stated, "I am as hungry as a sick kitten." She asked the
surveyor: "Do you have something to eat and drink?" No
combativeness was displayed and the resident appeared anxious to
go to lunch in the dining room. She remained in the hallway
outside the dining room until 12:30 P.M. At that time she
complained that her feet hurt. No footrests were present on her
wheelchair and her feet were dangling in the air. She proceeded
to place her feet on the wheels of the wheelchair in front of
her and stated, "That's better." She stated that she was tired
of waiting but continued to converse with passers-by. At 12:35
P.M., the doors to the dining room were opened and she pulled
herself by using the handrail to the doorway. At that point, an
aide came and ambulated her to a table. The place card on the
table was for another resident and no place card for Resident #7
was present in the room. After surveyor intervention, a place
card was placed in front of her and she stated to her tablemate,
"That's my name, look." At 12:41 P.M., an aide delivered two
containers of chocolate milk to her and poured them both into 2
glasses. She immediately started to drink the milk. When asked
what she wanted for lunch, her answer was, "I want it all." At
12:45 P.M., she was offered and accepted a clothing protector.
At 12:46 P.M., an aide was taking the order from her tablemate.
The Aide then looked at Resident #7 and pointed to the resident
while asking a nurse, "Is she new?" The nurse called out the
resident's name. The aide left without taking the resident's
lunch order.
9.12 At 12:55 P.M., no staff had returned to take
Resident #7's lunch order. The surveyor then asked the Dietary
Aide who previously had not known the name of the resident if
she was going to take the resident's order. The aide stated,
"She gets a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and soup for
lunch." The Surveyor requested that lasagna be offered to the
resident along with the sandwich. At 1:03 P.M., the lasagna and
Soup were served to the resident. She took a few bites of the
lasagna, garlic bread, and soup. She proceeded to dip crackers
into the soup and eat them. A sandwich was brought to her and
she proceeded to eat the entire sandwich and to drink 1 glass of
chocolate milk and 1 cup of coffee with cream and sugar. She
requested and ate a few bites of ice cream,
9.13 At 8:05 A.M. on 10/17/02, the surveyor contacted
a family member via telephone. The interview revealed that the
family had various concerns regarding the care and services
rendered to the resident. The member stated that enormous
resident. The family members had tried to communicate to staff
on numerous occasions that the resident must be approached in a
friendly, funny way, not with a demanding attitude. A demanding
attitude would result in resistance by the resident. The
resident should be coaxed rather than told she must do
something. The family member stated, "They either don't know
how to approach her or don't care." The family member related,
"She is always ina dirty hospital gown and frequently needs
showers. When I press the call bell it is always at least 15
minutes before someone comes to assist. I have gone over and
over with the aides how to get her to drink and eat. For a
while she drank nothing because they did not spend time trying
to coax her to drink. JI put a sign in her bathroom to remind
trying to get her medications in gel-form because she refuses to
swallow many of her meds. A nurse who works here told us the
gel-form might work better for her. I was hoping that Hope
Hospice could get the gel-form meds for us, but we had a consult
yesterday and she is not eligible for Hospice. I overheard one
aide, " ", making negative comments about the resident and
laughing and joking with other staff members about her. I
didn't appreciate that but I didn't say anything.”
9.14 During the afternoon of 10/16/02 at approximately
3:15 P.M., a conference was held with the DON (Director of
Nursing), the Administrator, and the Consultant RD (Registered
Dietitian) during which the concerns regarding the care of this
resident were communicated. One concern that was shared was why
this resident with Alzheimer's Disease was not living in Thalia
(Secured Unit). No answer was given except that the resident's
condition had not stabilized.
9.15 At noon on the last day of the survey the
resident was observed to be sitting in her wheelchair complete
with foot rests in the hallway across from the nurses' station.
She appeared to be enjoying watching the activity occurring and
smiled at the surveyor while eating a chocolate Magic Cup. She
was dressed in street clothes, stated she was ready to go to the
dining room for lunch, and told the surveyor, "Good-bye. Be
good, but if you can't be good, be careful."
10. The above actions or inactions constitute a violation
of 59A-4.106(4) (aa) and 59A-4.1288 Florida Administrative Code
incorporating by reference 42 CFR 483.25 Fl. Stat. (2002) which
defines a Class II as a situation that has compromised the
resident's ability to maintain or reach his or her highest
practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as
defined by an accurate and comprehensive resident assessment,
plan of care, and provision of services.
11. The Agency seeks to impose a Conditional Licensure
Status effective October 17, 2002, based on one Class II
deficiency Sections 400.23(7) (b), 400.23(8) (b) and 400.022(3),
Florida Statutes.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA requests this Court to order the following
relief:
A.
Make factual and legal findings in favor of the Agency
on Count I;
Recommend that the change of licensure status
effective October 17, 2002, from Standard to
Conditional be upheld; and
Assess costs related to the investigation and
prosecution of this case pursuant to § 400.121 (10)
Fl. Stat. (2002)
All other general and equitable relief allowed by law.
DISPLAY OF LICENSE
Pursuant to Section 400.062(5) and Section
400.23(7) (e), Florida Statutes, MANOR CARE OF BOYNTON
BEACH, INC., d/b/a MANOR CARE HEALTH SERVICES shall post
the license in a prominent place that is in clear and
unobstructed public view at or near the place where
residents are being admitted to the facility.
NOTICE
MANOR CARE OF BOYNTON BEACH, INC., d/b/a MANOR CARE HEALTH
SERVICES is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Section 120.569, Florida
Statutes. Specific options for administrative action are set
out in the attached Explanation of Rights (one page) and
Election of Rights (one page).
All requests for hearing shall be made to the attention of
Eileen O’Hara Garcia, Senior Attorney, Agency for Health Care
Administration, 525 Mirror Lake Drive, North, Sebring Building,
Suite 330D, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO REQUEST
A HEARING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT WILL
RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT AND
THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
Cobrece tut isGbmitted,
HO. iA < Aktle/
Eileen O'Hara Garcia, Esquire
AHCA ~- Senior Attorney
525 Mirror Lake Drive, North
Sebring Building, Suite 330D
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(727) 552-1439 (Office)
(727) 552-1440 (FAX)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy hereof has been furnished to
C T Corporation System, 1200 South Pine Island Road, Plantation,
Florida 33324, by U.S. Mail and to Administrator, Manor Care
Health Services, 13881 Eagle Ridge Drive, Fort Myers, Florida
33912 by U.S. Certified Mail Return Receipt No.7002 2030 0007
8499 5785, on January [eroos.
Copies furnished to:
C T Corporation System
Registered Agent for
Manor Care health Services
1200 South Pine Island Road
Plantation, Florida 33324
(U.S. Mail)
Administrator
Manor Care Health Services
13881 Eagle Ridge Drive
Fort Myers, Florida 33912
(U.S. Certified Mail)
Eileen O'Hara Garcia
AHCA - Senior Attorney
525 Mirror Lake Drive, North
Sebring Building, Suite 330D
Saint Petersburg, Florida 33701
A
|
fa
A\
| / -
J Ol Ye
MWD §fL- ahua
Eileen O’Ha¥a Garcia, Esquire
d
Docket for Case No: 03-000936
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Dec. 17, 2003 |
Final Order filed.
|
Aug. 04, 2003 |
Letter to L. McCharen, Agency Clerk, Agency for Health Care Administration from Judge Stevenson transmitting transcript and exhibits.
|
Aug. 04, 2003 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jul. 31, 2003 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed by A. Clark.
|
Jul. 29, 2003 |
Transcript filed. |
Jul. 07, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for August 15, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Myers, FL).
|
Jun. 27, 2003 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to |
Jun. 26, 2003 |
Unilateral Pre-hearing Stipulation filed.
|
Jun. 23, 2003 |
Respondent`s Exhibits 1-11 and Exhibit 13 filed by A. Clark.
|
Jun. 23, 2003 |
Unilateral Pre-hearing Stipulation filed by Respondent.
|
May 13, 2003 |
Notice of Service of Answers to Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Apr. 23, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Video Teleconference issued (video hearing set for June 27, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Myers and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Apr. 21, 2003 |
Agreed Motion to Reschedule Final Hearing (filed via facsimile).
|
Apr. 10, 2003 |
Respondent`s First Request for Production of Documents to Petitioner filed.
|
Apr. 10, 2003 |
Notice of Service of Respondent`s First Set of Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
|
Apr. 07, 2003 |
Notice and Certificate of Service of Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories to Respondent (filed via facsimile).
|
Apr. 01, 2003 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Apr. 01, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference issued (video hearing set for June 12, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Myers and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Apr. 01, 2003 |
Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 03-000935, 03-000936)
|
Mar. 27, 2003 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed by A. Clark.
|
Mar. 27, 2003 |
Agreed Motion to Consolidate (of case nos. 03-0936, 03-0935) filed by A. Clark.
|
Mar. 19, 2003 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Mar. 18, 2003 |
Conditional License filed.
|
Mar. 18, 2003 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Mar. 18, 2003 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Proceeding filed.
|
Mar. 18, 2003 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|