Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: NINTH STREET HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, LLC., D/B/A HERITAGE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER
Judges: LAWRENCE P. STEVENSON
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Naples, Florida
Filed: Apr. 01, 2003
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, October 23, 2003.
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION 93 Av? ! PH
R - .
Pak
STATE OF FLORIDA,
AGENCY FOR HEALTH
CARE ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, Or%r- Het
AHCA NO: 2002049119
vs. '
NINTH STREET HEALTH CARE
ASSOCIATES, LLC, d/b/a HERITAGE
HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT :
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(hereinafter “AHCA”), by and through the undersigned counsel,
and files this Administrative Complaint, against NINTH STREET
HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, LLC, d/b/a HERITAGE HEALTHCARE &
REHABILITATION CENTER, (hereinafter “Respondent”) and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose an administrative fine in
the total amount of nine thousand dollars ($9,000) pursuant: to
Sections 400.102(1) (a) and (d), 400.022(3), and 400.23 (8) (
Florida Statutes.
2. The Respondent was cited for the deficiencies set
forth below as a result of a revisit survey conducted on or
about November 26, 2002, as a follow-up to the annual heaith
licensure and recertification survey conducted on or about
October 21-24, 2002.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE '
3. The Agency has jurisdiction over the Respondent
pursuant to Chapter 400, Part II, Florida Statutes.
4. Venue lies in Collier County, Division of
Administrative Hearings, pursuant to Section 120.57 Florida
Statutes, and Chapter 28-106.207 F.A.C.
PARTIES | j
5. AHCA, is the enforcing authority with regard to
nursing home licensure law pursuant to Chapter 400, Part II,
Florida Statutes and Rules 59A-4, Florida Administrative Code.
6. Respondent is a nursing home located at 777 - 9%
Street North, Naples, Florida 34102. The facility is licensed
under Chapter 400, Part II, plorida Statutes and Chapter 59A-4,
Florida Administrative Code.
COUNT I
RESPONDENT FAILED TO ENSURE THAT NONFLAMMABLE MEDICAL GAS
SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT USED FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF INHALATION
THERAPY AND FOR RESUSCITIVE PURPOSES COMPLY WITH NFPA STANDARDS,
VIOLATING RULE 59A-4.130(1), FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
'
CLASS III DEFICIENCY
7. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates (1) through (6) as if
fully set forth herein.
8. Based on observations, the facility failed to ensure
that non-medical flammable medical gas is handled and stored in
accordance with NFPA 99, 13-5.1, 7-1.2, and NFPA 70.
9. Specifically:
(a) One unsecured E-tank oxygen cylinders was
observed in the oxygen storage room on the second
floor.
(b) The facility Plan of Correction stated that an
in-service of all facility employees on the handling
and storage on non-flammable medical gas would be
completed before the correction date of November 22,
2002.
(c) Interviews with the Administrator, Risk
Manager, Assistant Director of Nursing, and the
Maintenance Director revealed that the “in-service”
was not performed as required.
10. Based on the foregoing, HERITAGE HEALTHCARE &
REHABILITATION CENTER violated Rule 59A-4.130(1), Florida
Administrative Code that requires the facility to comply with
all life safety code requirements and building code standards.
11. The above referenced violation constitutes the grounds
for the imposed uncorrected Class III deficiency and for which a
fine of three thousand dollars ($3,000) is authorized pursuant
to Section 400.23(8)(c), Florida Statutes.
COUNT IT
RESPONDENT FAILED TO ENSURE THAT RESIDENTS CHOICES WERE HONORED
FOR TWO (2) RESIDENTS WHO WERE CARE PLANNED FOR FOOD
PREFERENCES, VIOLATING RULE 59A-4.1288, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE
CODE, INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE 42 CFR 483.15(b), FLORIDA
STATUTES, AND SECTION 400.022(1) (L), FLORIDA STATUTES. '
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
12. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates (1) through (6) as if
fully set forth herein.
13. Based upon observation, record review and interviews,
it was determined that the facility failed to assure that
resident choices were honored for two residents (residents #9
and #11) who were care planned for food preferences, including
but not limited to portion size choices. The facility also
failed to honor portion sizes for six residents (residents #21,
#48, #49, #51, #52 and #53) as indicated on the lunch meal tray
preference tickets.
14. Specifically,
# (a) Resident #9 had a significant change Minimum
Data Set (MDS) completed on 8/27/02. The Resident
Assessment Protocol (RAP) for Nutritional Status
revealed, "Name Omitted is receiving a NCS-NAS (No
Concentrated Sweets-No Added Salt) Diet. In addition
she is getting a small portion per her request. Her
food intake is poor, she receives dietetic snacks wit
meals." The resident's Care Plan for Nutrition dated
9/3/02 under approaches states, "Provide NCS-NAS Diet
with small portions per her request. Provide mashed
potato with Lunch and Dinner."
(bo) On 11/26/02 at approximately 12:49 P.M., a
surveyor spoke with the resident in her room and
observed the meal. The meal consisted of Fish, Butter
Beans, Hush Puppies, Apple Juice, Cheese Cake, and
Cole Slaw. The meal was observed to be a regular
portion meal and not a small portion per resident
‘request and care plan. Additionally the resident was
not served mashed potatoes. The resident's preference
card from Dietary stated the resident "liked" and
"disliked" mashed potatoes. The surveyor asked the
resident whether she liked mashed potatoes or not.
The resident stated she liked mashed potatoes.
(c) In an interview with the Director of Nurses
(DON), Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON), and
Registered Dietitian (RD) on 11/26/02 at approximately
4:00 P.M., the DON acknowledged the resident should
have received masked potatoes with her lunch. The RD
stated she had spoken with the resident last Friday
(November 22, 2002) and the resident indicated she
likes mashed potatoes. The RD stated to the surveyor
the facility failed to correct the resident's
preference card.
(d) Review of Resident #11's Care Plan on 11/26/02
at approximately 4:00 P.M., addressing "Weight
Fluctuation", revealed the resident was to be
"provided small portion, NAS (No Added Salt) diet per
request." Observation of Resident #11's meal ticket
during lunch on 11/26/02 at approximately 12:20 P.M.
revealed that the resident was to receive "small
portions." The resident received regular size
portions on her plate.
(e) During observation of the lunch meal tray line
on 11/26/02 at 11:30 A.M., it was observed that there
were no serving utensils on the tray line for serving
small portions. Review of the facility's printed menu
revealed that it did not list the amount of food to
give for small portions.
(£) During the meal service, small portions was
noted to be listed on the meal tickets as a resident
preference/choice for Residents #9 and #11 and RS
Residents #21, #48, #49, #51, #52 and #53. The cook
was observed serving regular size portions or larger
to these residents. The cook served approximately 3-4
ounces of fish (menu listed 2 ounces for regular
portion), #* cup of butter beans, 4% cup of coleslaw, 2
hush puppies and a regular portion of cheesecake for
residents on regular small portion diets. The pureed
small portion diets were served a #16 scoop (1/4 cup)
of pureed fish, #8 (1/2 cup) pureed butter beans, #8
(1/2 cup) of pureed hush puppies (menu listed #16
scoop or % cup for regular portion) and 4 ounces of
pureed fruit. The Mechanical Soft small portion diets
were served 4 ounces of chopped fish, * cup of butter
beans, 2 hush puppies and a regular serving of
cheesecake.
(g) Interview with the Dietary Manager on 11/26/C2
at 12:40 P.M., revealed that there was no written
policy regarding small portions. He stated that the
staff serves portions that are "a little smaller than
regular."
(h) Interview with the cook on 11/26/02 at 1:00
P.M., revealed that she had no written guidelines to
follow for small portions. She stated that she gave
"one small piece of fish, a'‘little less of the
vegetables and 2 hush puppies because the regular
serving was small to begin with." She confirmed that
she did not have smaller serving utensils on the tray
line to measure out a smaller portion. Observation of
the cook throughout the meal service from 11:30 A.M.
to 1:00 P.M. revealed that she did not serve small
portions as she had indicated.
15. Based on the foregoing, HERITAGE HEALTHCARE &
REHARILITATION CENTER violated Rule 59A-4.1288, Florida
Administrative Code, incorporating by reference 42 CFR
483.15(b), and Section 400.022(1) (1), Florida Statutes, which
requires the facility to give residents adequate and appropriate
health care and protective and support services consistent with
the resident’s care plan, and to provide residents with the
right to choose activities, schedules, and health care
consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plan of
care.
16. The above referenced violation constitutes the grounds
for the imposed uncorrected Class III deficiency and for which a
fine of one thousand dollars ($1, 000) is authorized pursuant to
Section 400.23(8) (c), Florida Statutes.
COUNT III
RESPONDENT FAILED TO ENSURE THAT CARE PLANS FOR TWO RESIDENTS
WERE IMPLMENTED BY STAFF, VIOLATING RULE 59A-4.1288, FLORIDA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE 42 CFR
483.20(k) (3) (ii), AND SECTION 400.022(1)(L), FLORIDA STATUTES.
UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
17. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates (1) through (6) as if
fully set forth herein.
18. Based on the observation, record review and staff
interview, the facility did not ensure that care plans for two
residents, (residents #46 and #9), were implemented by staff, as
evidenced by the following:
(a) Allowing a resident who needed assistance with
mobility to sit in a dining room for a duration
of 3 hours without providing assistance for
repositioning and pressure reduction;
(b) Failing to assist a resident who is dependerit on
staff for toileting needs; and
(c) Failing to provide a resident mashed potatoes
based on the resident’s request and devised plan
of care.
19. Specifically, the findings include:
(a) Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on
10/25/01 with multiple diagnoses including, not
limited to Organic Brain Syndrome, Osteoporosis, and
History of Hip Fracture.
(b) Review of Resident #46's nurses notes revealed
that on 11/01/02 at 2:00 P.M., it was indicated the
resident needed, "..limited to extensive assist..with
transfers and toileting..." On 11/11/02, nurses notes
document that the resident is "toileted by staff" and '
on 11/17/02 at 8:00 P.M., nurses notes revealed,
"requires assist times 1 (of one person) with
transfers and ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) ."
(c) Resident's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated
11/19/02 assessed the resident to.have both short and
long term memory problems. He/She was also assessed
as being non-ambulatory and requiring the physical
support of 1 person to assist him/her with transfers.
(d) Review of the resident's ADL Care Plan dated
11/26/02 revealed, "Assistance required in performance
of ADL tasks secondary to Mobility Limitations and
Vision Loss." Another Care Plan problem identified by
the facility on 11/26/02 stated, "Increased Risk of
Skin Breakdown Related to History of Pressure Area,
assistance required in bed mobility...” Approaches
listed for this plan of care: included, "Assist to turn
and reposition q (every) 2 hours for comfort and
pressure reduction" and "Check every two hours and prn
y(as needed) for toileting need."
(e) Observation of the resident on 11/26/02 at 9:20
A.M., revealed the resident sitting toward the back of
the dining room, in his/her wheelchair with head down,
eyes closed. The resident was leaning on his/her left
side with his/her left arm pressing against the arm of
the wheelchair. The resident remained in this
position through 12:15 P.M., a duration of 3 hours.
Two activity events had occurred while the resident
sat in the back of the room in this position without
receiving any assistance or intervention. At 12:20
P.M., a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) pushed the
resident, who remained in this position, to the lunch
table, with 2 other tablemates. The resident was
sitting at the table, head bent forward, eyes closed,
leaning to the left side. The resident was served
lunch and remained unassisted for 10 minutes until
‘surveyor intervention. At 12:30 P.M., the CNA walkec
over to the resident and shook the resident's right
shoulder to arouse the resident. Observation by the
surveyor revealed that from 9:20 A.M. through 1:00
P.M., the resident did not receive any assistance in
turning or repositioning for comfort and pressure
reduction, nor was the resident checked for toileting
needs, based on the devised plan of care.
(f) Resident #9 had a significant change,Minimum Data
Set (MDS) completed on 8/27/02. The Resident
Assessment Protocol (RAP) for Nutritional Status
revealed, "Name Omitted is receiving a NCS-NAS (No
Concentrated Sweets-No Added Salt) Diet. In addition
she is getting a small portion per her request. Her
food intake is poor, she receives dietetic snacks wit
meals." The resident Care Plan dated 9/3/02, under
approaches states, "Provide NCS-NAS Diet with small
portions per her request. Provide Mashed Potato with j
Lunch and Dinner."
(g) On 11/26/02 at approximately 12:49 P.M., a
surveyor spoke with the resident in her room and
observed the meal. The meal consisted of Fish, Butter
Beans, Hush Puppy, Apple Juice, Cheese Cake, and Cole
Slaw. The meal was observed to be a regular portion
and not a small portion per resident request and Care
Plan. Additionally the resident was not served mashed
potatoes. The resident's preference card from Dietary
stated the resident "liked" and "disliked" mashed
potatoes. The surveyor asked the resident whether she
liked mashed potatoes or not. The resident stated she
like mashed potatoes.
(h) In an interview with the Director of Nurses
(DON), Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON), and
Registered Dietitian (RD) on 11/26/02 at approximately
4:00 P.M., the DON acknowledged the resident should
have received masked potatoes. The RD stated she had
spoken with the resident last Friday (November 22,
2002) and the resident indicated she likes mashed
potatoes. The RD stated to the surveyor the facility
failed to correct the resident's preference card.
20. Based on the foregoing, HERITAGE HEALTHCARE &
REHABILITATION CENTER violated Rule 59A-4.1288, Florida
Administrative Code, incorporating by reference 42 CFR
483.20 (k) (3) (11), and Section 400.022(1) (1), Florida Statutes,
which requires the facility to provide residents with adequate
and appropriate health care and protective and support services
consistent with the resident’s care plan.
21. The above referenced violation constitutes the grounds
for the imposed uncorrected Class III deficiency and for which a
fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) is authorized pursuant to
Section 400.23(8) (c), Florida Statutes.
' COUNT IV
RESPONDENT FAILED TO ENSURE MENUS MET THE NUTRITIONAL NEEDS OF
RESIDENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDED DIETARY ALLOWANCES
OF THE FOOD AND NUTRITION BOARD OF THE NATIONAL RESEARCH
COUNCIL, NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES; BE PREPARED IN ADVANCE;
AND BE FOLLOWED, VIOLATING RULE 59A~-4.1288, FLORIDA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE 42 CFR
483.35(c¢) (1)-(3), AND SECTION 400.022(1) (L), FLORIDA STATUTES.
# UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
22. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates (1) through (6) as if
fully set forth herein.
23. Based on observation of the tray line and meal service
in the dining room, review of the facility’s printed menu and
alternate menu and dietary staff interviews, the facility failed
to follow their cycle and alternate menus for three (3)
residents, (residents #9, #50 and #51), and for those resicents
who were prescribed pureed, mechanical soft, low cholesterol, no
concentrated sweets and finger food diets. This was evidericed
by:
(a) Food was not prepared with correct portion sizes
and for each resident’s diets in accordance’ with
the menu;
(b) Food was not prepared in accordance with the pre-
planned alternate menu; and
(c) Adequate amounts of food to follow the menu for
all residents needing to be served the meal were
not provided.
24. Specifically, the findings include:
(a) During observation of the lunch meal tray line on
11/26/02 at 11:20 A.M., the cook was observed
preparing grilled cheese sandwiches. Tomato soup and
stewed tomatoes were observed on the steam table.
Interview with the cook revealed that these items were
the alternate menu items for the meal.
(b) Review of the facility's pre-planned alternate
menu revealed that the grilled cheese and tomato soup
was planned for Monday and the Tuesday alternate lunch
meal was veal patty with gravy, mashed potatoes and
carrots. None of these menu items were observed on
the tray line.
(c) Further interview with the cook at 11:35 A.M.,
revealed that there were no veal patties in stock to
prepare. She stated that she had not prepared the
carrots because there were no canned carrots in the
stock room so she prepared stewed tomatoes instead.
The cook also stated that she had not checked if there
were any frozen carrots. She confirmed that she had
prepared the same alternate meal on Monday because the
residents "always ask for grilled cheese sandwiches."
(d) Interview with the Dietary Manager on 11/26/02 at
11:45 A.M., revealed the veal was in the freezer and
he instructed the cook to prepare the veal for the
lunch meal. The cook checked the freezer and stated
that there was no veal. The Dietary Manager checked
11
the freezer and told the cook to prepare hotdogs and
frozen carrots.
(e) Review of the facility's approved printed menu
for Week III, Day 2, Tuesday (Fall and Winter 2002-
2003), xvevealed that residents on pureed diets were to
be servéd 1 T of lemon butter sauce with their pureed
fish, a second #8 (1/2 cup) serving of pureed
vegetables to replace the coleslaw, a #16 (1/4 cup)
serving of pureed Hushpuppies and slurried cheesecake
with garnish.
(£) Observation of the lunch meal tray line on
11/26/02 at 11:30 A.M. revealed that the cook was
serving plain pureed fish without the sauce, a #8
serving of pureed butterbeans without a second
vegetable serving, a #8 serving of the pureed
Hushpuppies instead of a #16, and: pureed peaches
instead of the slurried cheesecake.
(g) Interview with the dietary aides at noon revealed
that they had not made a slurried cheesecake for the
meal and they had decided to serve the pureed fruit in
its place. Interview with the Dietary Manager
revealed he was not aware that the staff had not made
the slurried cheesecake. They also confirmed that
they had not made the #8 serving of pureed vegetable
as listed on the menu to substitute for the coleslaw.
The cook was observed serving only one vegetable
serving, a #8 scoop of pureed butterbeans.
(h) Further review of the facility's approved menu
yvevealed that residents on mechanical soft diets were
to receive a #16 (1/4) cup of chopped fish with 1 T of
lemon butter sauce and a second #8 serving of a soft
vegetable to replace the coleslaw. Observation of the
lunch rinOimeal tray line on 11/26/02 at 11:30 A.M.
revealed that the cook was serving a plain chopped
fish without the additional sauce and a #8 serving of
butterbeans. There was. no second soft vegetable on
the steam table to replace the serving of coleslaw as
listed on the menu. The lemon butter sauce was on the
stove, but the cook never put it on the line to use or.
the pureed and mechanical soft fish. At 12:45 P.M.,
the cook ran out of chopped fish, so she began taking
a whole fillet of fish and chopping it up on the
resident's plate. She did not measure it after it was
chopped and served the 4-ounce fillet.
‘(i) Interview with the dietary aides and cook
revealed that they were not aware that a second
vegetable was listed on the menu for the residents or.
the pureed and mechanical soft diets. They stated
that they had not prepared a second vegetable for
either of the diets. The staff did not correct the
error once it was identified and continued to serve
the residents only one vegétable serving.
(j) Review of the menu revealed that residents on a
Low Cholesterol diet ‘were to follow the low fat menu
extension. Review of.the extension revealed that
residents on this diet were to receive plain baked
fish without the lemon butter sauce and a roll instead
of the Hushpuppies. Observation of the tray line
revealed that there were no rolls to serve on this
diet and no plain fish fillets. One resident who was
prescribed this diet received a regular diet with fish
that was coated with the butter sauce and breaded ,
Hushpuppies.
(k) Review of the menu for the extension for the
Finger Food diet revealed that residents on this diet
were to receive 2 ounces of fish strips, lemon butter
sauce for dipping, a #8 scoop of butterbeans, cucumber
sticks, 2 Hushpuppies and a #8 (1/2 cup) serving of
fruit instead of the cheesecake with the strawberry
glaze. Observation of the tray line at 12:45 P.M.
revealed that RS Resident #51 was served a chopped
hotdog on a bun, diced cooked carrots, cucumber sticks
and a square of strawberry cheesecake. Review of the
resident's meal ticket revealed that the resident did
not have dislike of fish. The resident was not served
the fish strips, butterbeans, Hushpuppies or fruit as
listed on the menu. The menu also stated that
sandwiches for the Finger Foods diet should be cut up
into 2 to 4 parts. The staff served the chopped
hotdog on a whole bun. The cook was not observed
checking the menu to determine what other foods should
be served on this diet.
(1) Interview with the dietary aide at 12:45 P.M.,
revealed that the fish strips had not been prepared
for the meal so they had to give hotdogs.
13
(m) Observation of the resident in the first floor
dining room at 1:10 P.M. revealed that she was having
a difficult time eating the chopped hotdog on the bun.
The meat was falling off of the bun as the resident ‘
was eating it. The staff had not cut up the
cheesecake into bite-size pieces that the resident
could pick up with her fingers.
(n) Interview with the RD at 2:00 P.M., confirmed
that the chopped hotdog was not an appropriate
substitute for the residents on the finger food diet.
(0) Further review of the tray line at 12:45 P.M.
revealed that RS Resident #50 was prescribed a High
Calorie Full Liquid diet. The staff was observed
serving her mashed potatoes with gravy. Review of the
resident's meal ticket revealed that mashed potatoes
were not listed on the menu for this resident.
(p) Interview with the dietary aide revealed that he
thought the mashed potatoes were allowed on this diet
since one other resident on this diet received them.
(q) Resident #9 was prescribed a No Concentrated
Sweets, 'No Added Salt diet with small portions.
Review of the resident's tray ticket for lunch on
11/26/02 revealed that she had a food preference for
mashed potatoes. Mashed potatoes were also listed
under the dislikes. The dietary staff setting up the
resident's tray were observed to be confused regarding
whether to serve rinOithe resident mashed potatoes or
ynot. The staff did not check with the Dietary Manager
and decided among themselves to serve the resident
Hushpuppies instead of the potatoes. Review of the
NCS menu extension revealed that the residents on this
diet were to be served 2 ounces of baked fish and a
diet version of the cheesecake that had a fruit
garnish. Observation of the steam table revealed that
the cook was serving various size fillets of fish from
3 to 4 ounces. She did not weigh a portion of the
fish prior to starting the tray line to determine the
correct portion size. The diet cheesecake on the tray
line was plain without a fruit garnish. These
incorrect items were served to Resident #9.
(rv) Interview with the RD at 2:00 P.M., revealed that
there were many errors on the meal tickets and she
would have to check the computer entries for each
resident to verify that they were receiving the
correct food items.
(s) At 12:55 P.M., the staff ran out of cheesecake
for the regular and No Concentrated Sweets diets. The
aide stated, "I'm three desserts short." The aides
did not check with the Dietary Manager and began
serving sliced oranges. The surveyor notified the
Dietary Manager who questioned the staff regarding the
lack of cheesecake. The aide stated that,they "made
what we had." The manager instructed the staff to
served diced peaches.
(t) Review of the Production Sheets for the Week III
(Day 2 - Tuesday) menu revealed that the fish strips
were listed as an item that needed to be prepared for
the lunch meal. The pureed and soft vegetables were
also listed under the coleslaw as the items to make
for the pureed and mechanical soft diets. The ;
slurried cheesecake, fruit and diet cheesecake with
fruit garnish were listed as items that needed to be
prepared for dessert.
25. Based on the foregoing, HERITAGE HEALTHCARE &
REHABILITATION CENTER violated Rule 59A-4.1288, Florida
Administrative Code, incorporating by reference 42 CFR
483.35(c)(1)-(3), and Section 400.022 (1) (1), Florida Statutes,
which requires that facility menus meet the nutritional needs of
residents in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances
of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research
Council, National Academy of Sciences; be prepared in advance;
and be followed, and to provide residents with adequate and
appropriate health care and protective and support services
consistent with the resident’s care plan.
26. The above referenced violation constitutes the crounds
for the imposed uncorrected Class III deficiency and for which a
fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) is authorized pursuant to
Section 400.23(8) (c), Florida Statutes.
COUNT V
RESPONDENT FAILED TO STORE, PREPARE, DISTRIBUTE, AND SERVE FOOD
UNDER SANITARY CONDITIONS, VIOLATING RULE 59A-4.1288,
INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE 42 CFR 483.35(h) (2), RULE 59A-4.122,
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, AND SECTION 400.022(1) (L), FLORIDA
STATUTES. ;
_ UNCORRECTED CLASS III DEFICIENCY
27. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates (1) through (6) as if
fully set forth herein. |
28. Based on observations and interviews with dietary
staff, the facility failed to prepare, hold and serve food under
sanitary conditions to prevent the development of harmful
micr@organisms that can cause food borne illness and failed to
maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent
the spread of harmful microorganisms, as evidenced by:
(a) Cold food not held proper temperature below 41
degrees F.;
(b) Hot food not cooked to proper holding temperature
prior to serving to residents;
(c) Unsanitary food handling practices and use of
contaminated gloves for handling resident food
and plates;
(da) Freezer gasket and air vents covered with black
mildew and dust;
16
(e) Improper food thawing practices;
(£) Unsanitary handling of sanitized dishes; and
(g) The kitchen had dirty air vents and freezer
gaskets and there was no cleaning schedule for
the kitchen.
29. Specifically, the findings include:
(a) During the initial tour of the kitchen on
11/26/02 at 9:15 A.M., the mixer blade on the large
‘mixer was coated with a white substance; 2 large
packages of frozen fish were in the sink in a bowl
partially covered with water. The water was not
running. Most of the fish was not in the water. A
pan labeled "cheesecake", dated 11/25/02, was observed
on a rack next to the steam table.
(b) During observation of the food preparation for
the lunch meal at 11:20 A.M., the second cook was
observed making sandwiches for the lunch meal. A ham
and cheese sandwich and 2 plates of sliced cheese were
observed on the counter next to the tray line. ‘The
sandwiches and cheese were not refrigerated and had no
means to maintain a cold temperature. A package of
frozen Hushpuppies was observed sitting on the counter
next to the steam table. The label on the package
stated, "Keep frozen until ready to use." The package
sat on the counter throughout the entire meal service.
Temperature check of the Hushpuppies at 12:40 P.M.
revealed that they were 55 degrees F. and completely
thawed. The Hushpuppies remained on the counter at
the end of the tray line at 1:00 P.M.
(c) During the observation of the meal service at
11:30 A.M., the cook took the temperature of some of
the hot foods and did not check the temperature of the
cold foods. The staff put out 2 trays of cheesecake
and a tray of coleslaw at 11:40 A.M. onto a rack
without means of refrigeration to keep the cheesecake
or coleslaw cold. Temperature check of the regular
and diet cheesecake and the coleslaw revealed they
were 60 degrees F. at the beginning of the tray line.
Temperature check of the diet cheesecake at 12:30 P.M.
revealed it was 70 degrees F. and at 12:40 P.M. the
diet cheesecake was 80 degrees F. The staff continued
to serve the diet cheesecake to the residents
17
‘
throughout the entire meal without monitoring the
temperature.
(d) The staff also placed out two pans on the tray
line that contained yogurt, ice cream, magic cups and
shakes. Ice was put around the items. The staff did
not check the temperature of these cold food items
before beginning the tray line. The yogurt was
stacked three deep in the pans and was not covered by
the ice. Temperature check of the yogurt at the end
of the tray line at 1:00 P.M. revealed it was 48
degrees F. The aide asked what the temperature was
and put the yogurt back into the walk-in refrigerator.
(e) The pan of cheesecake dated 11/25 observed at
9:15 A.M. was still on the rack at 11:55 A.M.
Temperature check of the cheesecake revealed it was 80
degrees F.
(£) Interview with the Dietary Manager revealed that
he did not know why the cheesecake had not been
refrigerated and remained un-refrigerated all morning
on the rack.
(g) At 11:55 A.M., the cook was observed opening the
steamer to check the temperature of the carrots. She
was observed placing her gloved finger in the carrots,
putting the gloved finger in her mouth and returning
to the steam table. The carrots were left in the
steamer and later served to the residents. The cook
did not change her gloves or wash her hands and
continued to handle resident plates, food and serving
Yutensils. The cook did not change her gloves
throughout the entire meal service even though she was
touching un-sanitized items throughout the kitchen
while she was serving the meal.
(h) At 11:55 A.M., a pan of pureed squash was
observed uncovered on the counter in front of the
steamer. The squash had been taken off of the tray
line due to lack of space. Temperature check of the
squash revealed it was. 120 degrees F. The pan sat on
the counter and was later put in the steamer and
served to the residents. The pans on the steam table
were not properly placed so that all of the pans were
placed down into the hot water to maintain the
temperature. The temperature of the pureed alternate
meat was checked at 12:05 P.M. and found to be 115
degrees F. The staff continued to serve it to the
residents.
(1) At 11:55 P.M., the cook removed 2 hotdogs from
the steamer and served them to a resident without
first verifying that they were fully heated and at
proper serving temperature. . Temperature check of the’
hotdogs with the Dietary Manager revealed that they
were 115 degrees F.
(j) At 12:10 P.M., the second cook was observed
rinsing the blender in the food preparation sink. She
did not wash or sanitize the blender before preparing
the next pureed food, item.
(k) Observation at 12:25 P.M., revealed an aide
washing dishes in the three-compartment sink. ‘The
aide put the dishes on the side of the sink after they
were removed from the sanitizer solution. She then
wiped them with a towel before putting them on the
rack. Interview with the Dietary Manager and the aide
at 12:30 P.M., revealed that she was not aware that
the pans needed to be air dried and not wiped with a
cloth.
(1) Observation of the ceiling vents in the food
preparation area at 12:40 P.M. revealed that they were
covered with a black substance that was extended out
onto the ceiling from the corners of the vent.
Observation of the air vents in the remainder of the
kitchen at 4:35 P.M. revealed that the vents were
dusty and dirty with a black substance covering the
vents. The gasket and rim of the walk-in freezer was
coated with black mildew.
(m) Interview with the Dietary Manager revealed that
the vents had not been cleaned. He stated that the
mildew was "hard to keep it off" on the rubber gaskets
and sides of the freezer door and rim. Earlier
interview with the Dietary Manager at 9:15 A.M.
revealed that there was no pre-planned cleaning
schedule for the kitchen. He stated that he had told
the staff to "clean as you go."
30. Based on the foregoing, HERITAGE HEALTHCARE &
REHABILITATION CENTER violated Rule 59A-4.1288, Florida
Administrative Code, incorporating by reference 42 CFR '
483.35(h) (2), Rule 59A-4.122, and Section 400.022(1) (1), Florida
Statutes, which requires the facility to prepare, store,
distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions, provide a
safe, clean, and sanitary environment, and to provide residents
with adequate and appropriate health care and protective and
support services.
31. The above referenced violation constitutes the grounds
for the imposed uncorrected Class III deficiency and for which a
fine of three thousand dollars ($3,000) is authorized pursuant
to Section 400.23(8) (c), Florida Statutes.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA requests this Court to order the
following relief:
HA. Make factual and legal findings in favor of the Agency
on Counts I, II, III, IV and Vv;
B. Impose a fine of nine thousand dollars ($9,000) for
the violations cited in Counts I, II, III, IV and Vv against: the
respondent as authorized under Sections 400.102(1) (a,d), and
400.23(8)(c), Florida Statutes;
c. Attorney’s fees and costs and
D. All other general and equitable relief allowed by law.
NOTICE
The Respondent is notified that it has a right to request
an administrative hearing pursuant to Section 120.569, Florida
Statutes. Specific options for administrative action are set
out in the attached Explanation of Rights (one page) and
Election of Rights (one page).
All requests for hearing shall be made to, the attention of
Michael P. Sasso, Senior Attorney, Agency for Health Care
Administration, 525 Mirror Lake Dr., Suite 330K, St. Petersburg,
Florida, 33701.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT A REQUEST FOR HEARING
MUST BE RECEIVED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT OR
WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE
COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
Respectfully submitted,
che [_Xfeee—
Michael P. Sasso, Esquire
AHCA ~- Senior Attorney
Fla. Bar No. 0167363
525 Mirror Lake Drive North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original Administrative Complaint
has been furnished via U.S. Certified Mail Return Receipt No.
21
7002 2030 0002 7109 5776 to CT Corporation System, Registered
Agent for Heritage Healthcare, 1200 South Pine Island Road,
Plantation, Florida 33324 and a copy of the foregoing has been
furnished via U.S. Certified Mail, Return Receipt No. 7002 2030
0002 7109 5783, to Laurence Reed, Administrator, Heritage
Healthcare, 777 - 9° street North, Naples, Florida 34102, on
January 3/7, 2003.
qwckill Pr. schecor
Michael P. Sasso, Esquire
COPIES TO:
CT 'Corporation System
Registered Agent for :
Heritage Healthcare &
Rehabilitation Center
1200 South Pine Island Road
Plantation, FL 33324
(U.S. Certified Mail)
Laurence Reed, Administrator
Heritage Healthcare &
Rehahilitation Center
777 - 9° Street North
Naples, FL 34102
(U.S. Certified Mail)
Michael P. Sasso, Esquire
Agency for Health Care Administration
525 Mirror Lake Drive North, Suite 330K
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
22
Docket for Case No: 03-001167
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Oct. 23, 2003 |
Response to Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Oct. 23, 2003 |
Order Closing Files. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 22, 2003 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction and Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Compel (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Oct. 17, 2003 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories (filed via facsimile)
|
Sep. 30, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for November 13 and 14, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Naples, FL).
|
Sep. 29, 2003 |
Unopposed Motion to Continue (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Sep. 24, 2003 |
Order. (Petitioner`s motion to compel is denied)
|
Sep. 15, 2003 |
Response to Petitioner`s Motion to Compel (filed by J. Adams via facsimile).
|
Sep. 03, 2003 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Compel Proper Answers from Respondent to Petitioner`s Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 28, 2003 |
Response to Request for Admissions (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Jul. 17, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for October 8 and 9, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Naples, FL).
|
Jul. 14, 2003 |
Motion to Continue filed by Petitioner.
|
Jun. 26, 2003 |
Petitioner`s First Set of Request for Admissions, Interrogatories, and Request for Production of Documents (filed via facsimile).
|
Jun. 09, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for August 26 and 27, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Naples, FL).
|
Jun. 06, 2003 |
Motion for Continuance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Apr. 18, 2003 |
Motion to Consolidate(of case nos. 03-1167, 03-1168, 03-1169) filed by Petitioner via facsimilie).
|
Apr. 18, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for June 17 and 18, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Naples, FL).
|
Apr. 14, 2003 |
Motion to Reschedule Final Hearing (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Apr. 11, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for June 11 and 12, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Naples, FL).
|
Apr. 11, 2003 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Apr. 11, 2003 |
Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 03-001167, 03-001168, 03-001169)
|
Apr. 02, 2003 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Apr. 01, 2003 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2003 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2003 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|