Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: LARGO ACLF, LTD., D/B/A THE HOMESTEAD OF LARGO
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Largo, Florida
Filed: May 08, 2003
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, August 11, 2003.
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE Certified Article Number
ADMINISTRATION,
7106 4575 4294 2050 0750
Petitioner, . SENDERS RECORD
ODd-1 ey
AHCA CASE NO. 2002049242
Vv. 2002049243
2002049132
LARGO ACLF, LTD., D/B/A
THE HOMESTEAD OF LARGO,
Respondent. Oc
/ sé
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT BS: zs oO
2)
q
*
COMES NOW THE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATIONS, Q
(hereinafter referred to as AHCA), by and through its .
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative
Complaint against LARGO ACLF, LTD., D/B/A THE HOMESTEAD OF
LARGO (hereinafter referred to as “Respondent”), pursuant
to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (2001),
and alleges the following:
Nature of the Action
1. This is an action to impose administrative fines
upon Respondent pursuant to Section 400.414, Florida
Statutes.
Jurisdiction And Venue
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Sections
120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes.
3. AHCA has jurisdiction over Respondent pursuant to
Chapter 400 Part III, Florida Statutes.
4. Venue vests pursuant to Rule 28-106.207, Plorida
Administrative Code.
Parties
5. Pursuant to Chapter 400, Part III, Florida
Statutes, and Rules 58A-5, Florida Administrative Code,
AHCA is the licensing and enforcing authority with regard
to assisted living facility laws and rules.
6. Respondent operates an assisted living facility
located at 750 Starkey Road, Largo, Florida 33771.
Respondent is and was at all times material hereto a
licensed facility under Chapter 400, Part III, Florida
Statutes and Chapter 58A-5, Florida Administrative Code,
with 168 beds and having been issued license number 7301.
COUNT I
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
SUBMIT A PRELIMINARY ADVERSE INCIDENT REPORT FOR A RESIDENT
WHO ELOPED ON 8/26/02. Section 400.423(3) Fla.Stat. (2002);
and Section 400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
7. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
8. On or about September 12, 2002, AHCA performed an
appraisal visit at Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited
Respondent based upon the findings below:
The facility did not submit a preliminary report of all adverse incidents within one
business day after the occurrence. The findings included an interview with the
nurse at approximately 12:00pm and review of adverse incident reports and
resident files. Resident #1 had two incidents of elopement on 8/26/02, and9/8/02
for which there was no documentation of an adverse incident reports on the day of
the appraisal visit.
9. On or about November 13, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its appraisal visit at Respondent’s facility.
AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
The facility did not submit a preliminary report of all adverse incidents within one
business day after the occurrence. The findings included:
Based upon an interview with the administrator and review of an adverse incident
report during this follow-up visit. Resident #1 had two incidents of elopement on
8/26/02, and 9/8/02. While an adverse incident report had been completed for the
incident of 9/8/02, there was no documentation of an adverse incident report for
the elopement occurring on 8/26/02.
Uncorrected from the visit of 9/12/02
10. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Section 400.423 Florida Statutes (2002), by reason of the
fact that Respondent failed to submit a preliminary adverse
incident report for a resident who eloped on 8/26/02.
11. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
12. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes
of October 12, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT ITI
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
SUBMIT A 15-DAY REPORT FOR A RESIDENT WHO ELOPED ON
8/26/02. Section 400.423(4) Fla.Stat.(2002); and Section
400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
13. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
14. On or about September 12, 2002, AHCA performed an
appraisal visit at Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited
Respondent based upon the findings below:
There was no documentation of a full report of the facility's investigation of two
incidents of elopement by resident #1. Review of facility records on the day of
the appraisal revealed no documentation of the facility's investigation of incidents
of elopement for resident #1 on 8/26/02 and 9/8/02.
15. On or about November 13, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its appraisal visit at Respondent’s facility.
AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
There was no documentation of a full report of the facility's investigation of an
incident of elopement by resident #1. Review of facility records on the day of this
follow-up visit of 11/13/02 revealed no documentation of the facility's
investigation of an incident of elopement for resident #1 on 8/26/02.
Uncorrected from the visit of 9/12/02.
16. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Section 400.423(4) Florida Statutes (2002), by reason of
the fact that Respondent failed to submit a 15 day report
for a resident who eloped on 8/26/02.
17. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
‘occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1){c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
18. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes
of October 12, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT IIT
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESIDENT SUPERVISION FOR A RESIDENT WHO
ELOPED ON 8/26/02. Rule 58A-5.0182 Fla. Admin. Code
(2002); and Section 400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
19. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
20. On or about September 12, 2002, AHCA performed an
appraisal visit at Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited
Respondent based upon the findings below:
The facility did not provide personal supervision as appropriate for each resident,
based on an interview with the nurse, and review of facility and resident records.
An interview with the nurse at approximately 12:00pm revealed that resident #1
had two incidents of elopement on 8/26/02 and 9/8/02. In the first incident, for
which there was an incident report, paramedics found the resident lying in a ditch
two blocks north of the facility. In the second incident, according to an interview
with the nurse at approximately 12:00pm, an alarm went on upstairs, and staff
went to look and found resident #1 missing. A second alarm went off downstairs
to an outside door, and staff notified the resident's family, who found the resident
lying in aditch. An interview with another investigator of the incident revealed
that staff did not leave the facility to search for the resident as it was dark out.
There was not adequate supervision of the resident to prevent either of the
elopements of the resident.
21. On or about November 13, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its appraisal visit at Respondent’s facility.
AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
The facility did not provide personal supervision as appropriate for each resident,
based on an interview with the nurse, and review of facility and resident records
during the appraisal visit of 9/12/02. On that date an interview with the nurse at
approximately 12:00 PM revealed that resident #1 had two incidents of elopement
on 8/26/02 and 9/8/02. In the first incident, for which there was an incident
report, paramedics found the resident lying in a ditch two blocks north of the
facility. In the second incident, according to an interview with the nurse (on
9/12/02 at approximately 12:00 PM) an alarm went on upstairs, and staff went to
look and found resident #1 missing. A second alarm went off downstairs to an
outside door, and staff notified the resident's family, who found the resident lying
in a ditch. An interview with another investigator of the incident (on 9/12/02)
revealed that staff did not leave the facility to search for the resident as it was dark
out. There was not adequate supervision of the resident to prevent either of the
elopements of the resident. During the follow-up visit of 11/13/02 it was
determined that documented evidence that the facility had initiated efforts to
ensure the above incident did not reoccur was not available. No changes in
procedures or staff training had occurred relative to this incident. The
administrator during interview on 11/13/02 indicated that in telephone
conversation with a corporate nurse, no changes had been made to
procedures/policies since this corporate person did not agree with the deficiency.
Uncorrected from the visit of 9/12/02
22. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Rule 58A-5.0182 Florida Administrative Code (2002), by
reason of the fact that Respondent failed to provide
adequate supervision for a resident who eloped on 8/26/02.
23. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
24. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes
of October 12, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT IV
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT’S STAFF
FAILED TO FOLLOW REQUIRED PROCEDURES WITH REGARD TO
MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION. Rule 58A-5.0185 Fla.Admin.Code
(2002); and Section 400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
25. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
26. On or about August 22, 2002, AHCA performed a
complaint investigation at Respondent’s facility. AHCA
cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based on observations of assistance with medication techniques and medication
observation records (MORs) documentation and record review it was determined
that staff assisting with self-administration of medications had not followed
required procedures to ensure that medications were given as prescribed for 5 of 9
residents sampled.
Findings include:
On the day of the investigation 08/22/02, based on observation, MOR
documentation and record review it was determined that, the steps trained staff
are to follow when assisting with medication were not being followed. The
following discrepancies were noted:
1, Observation of the medication pass for residents to include # 8 and 9 revealed
that centrally stored medication, in its dispensed, properly labeled containers were
being opened, the dosage was being placed in another container and this was
taken from the medication room to the resident for distribution.
2. Residents # 1, 2 and 7 had notations in the MOR for medications given on a
day or at a time when other documentation noted that no medication was available
for that resident. For resident # 1 Ocupress 1% eye drops were marked as given
on the morning of the investigation 08/22/02, it had not been available for several
previous days per MOR documentation and when the medication was requested
for verification it was not found.
3. Record review and observation determined that the medications for residents
to include # 2 and 8 were being marked as dispensed as they were placed in
alternate containers in central storage, not after they had been given. In the case
of resident # 8 the morning medications had been poured into an alternate
container in the moming, that container had been returned to the medication cart
and placed in another resident's drawer and distributed to the resident in the
dining room at 11:45.
4. Resident # 1 had medication which was administered in the form of a patch
which was to be placed on alternate arms each day. These patches had been
documented as not available for three days, on the day of the investigation
08/22/02 the patches were found in the medication cart in a drawer labeled
patches with 27 of 30 remaining. When asked about the patch staff indicated it
was not in the medication cart drawer labeled for the resident. The patch was
applied when brought to the attention of the Director of Nursing (DON).
5. Residents # 1, 2, 7, 8 and 9 had medication unavailable for days in June, July
and/or August for staff to distribute.
Failure to ensure that medication assistance follows the prescribed steps could
result in an adverse effect on the medical well-being of residents, confusion as to
what medications taken or not taken and a loss of dignity in the resident not being
as involved in the self-administration of medications process as they might
otherwise be able.
27. On or about November 13, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its complaint investigation at Respondent’s
facility. AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings
below:
On the day of this visit (11/13/02) based upon observation and review of the
medication observation records for four sampled residents, the facility did not
ensure that staff assisting residents with medications followed required
procedures in that medications were not available to distribute to one (1) of the
four (4) residents. Findings are.
The medication observation record (MOR) for resident identified as resident #2
was prescribed Risperdal .Smg. to be given 1 tab at the hour of sleep. The MOR
for November, 2002 did not include annotations that the resident received this
medication on the evening of 11/12/02. Further, this medication was not available
in the medication cart. During interview with the facility nurse, she stated that
documentation revealed that the pharmacy (Trellis) had been called for the
medication to be refilled on 11/11/02 but the facility had not received the refill as
of this date.
Uncorrected deficiency from the 8/22/02 visit.
28. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Rule 58A-5.0185 Florida Administrative Code(2002), by
reason of the fact that Respondent’s staff failed to follow
the required procedures when assisting residents with
administration of medication.
29. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
30. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Plorida Statutes
of September 22, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT V
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF AT LEAST ONE STAFF MEMBER, WITH
CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING, ON-DUTY AT ALL TIMES. Rule 58A-
5.019 Fla.Admin.Code(2002); and Section 400.414
Fla.Stat. (2002)
31. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
32. On or about September 16, 2002, AHCA performed an
annual survey at Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited
Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based on record review, it was determined that the facility had not ensured that at
least one staff member was in the facility at all times who was certified in first aid
and CPR.
Findings include:
On the day of the survey 09/16/02, based on record review and an interview with
the administrator it was determined that the facility had documentation available
showing that only one of eight employees reviewed was certified in first aid and
CPR and as a result it could not be ensured that a staff member certified in first
aid and CPR was in the facility at all times.
33. On or about November 21, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its annual survey at Respondent’s facility.
AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based on record review, it was determined that the facility had not ensured that at
least one staff member was in the facility at all times who was certified in first aid
and CPR.
Findings include:
On the day of the revisit survey of 11/21/02, based on record review and an
interview with the administrator it was determined that the facility did not have
documentation on file to verify that nine (9) of ten (10) employees were certified
in first aid and CPR. One (1) of the ten (10) employee records only had proof of
current valid 1st aid. As a result it could not be assured that there was a staff
member certified in first aid and CPR was in the facility at all times.
Uncorrected from survey of 9/16/02
34. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Rule 58A-5.0191(2002), by reason of the fact that
Respondent failed to provide verification of at least one
staff member with CPR/First Aid training, on-duty at all
times.
35. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
36. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes
of October 16, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT VI
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
ENSURE ALL MEDICATIONS WERE RE-FILLED IN A TIMELY MANNER.
Rule 58A-5.0185 Fla.Admin.Code (2002); and
Section 400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
37. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
38. On or about September 16, 2002, AHCA performed an
annual survey at Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited
Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based on record review the facility failed to make a reasonable effort to obtain
two medications on one of nine sampled residents (#6). Failure to obtain the |
prescribed medication places the resident at risk for deterioration of health.
Findings include:
Based on record review of the Medication Administration Record, resident #6 did
not receive her Colace or her Multivitamin for the period of 9/1/02 through
9/9/02.
This is a repeat deficiency from survey of 8/22/02.
39. On or about November 21, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its annual survey at Respondent’s facility.
AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based on review of the medication observation records for four sampled residents
on 11/13/02 and interview with the nurse the facility did not ensure that a
reasonable effort was made to obtain medications for one of the four residents
(#2). Failure to obtain the prescribed medication places the resident at risk for
deterioration of health.
Findings include:
Based on record review of the Medication Observation Record, resident #2 did
not receive his Resperdal .Smg. 1 Tab at the hour of sleep on 11/12/02 at 8pm.
According to interview with the facility nurse, the medication was ordered from
the pharmacy on 11/11/02 but had not been delivered. The nurse stated that
facility policy was for medications to be re-ordered seven to ten days prior to
running out. The policy had not been followed
Repeat deficiency from survey of 8/22/02 and uncorrected from survey of
9/16/02.
40. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Rule 58A-5.0185 Florida Administrative Code (2002), by
reason of the fact that Respondent failed to ensure
medications were re-filled in a timely manner.
41. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
42. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes
of October 16, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT VII
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
MAINTAIN ITS STRUCTURE IN SOUND AND GOOD REPAIR. Rule 58A-
5.023 Fla.Admin.Code (2002); and Section 400.414
Fla.Stat. (2002)
43. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
44. On or about July 17, 2001, AHCA performed a
complaint investigation at Respondent’s facility. AHCA
cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based upon a tour of the facility on the day of this complaint investigation all
areas were not maintained in good repair. Areas include but are not limited to the
following;
1. Room #214 had multiple small holes in the bathroom wall and the bathroom
vent was black with what appeared to be mold/mildew.
2. Room #102 had a large hole in the wall of the bathroom and the air
conditioning vent near the bedroom window was black with what appeared to be
mold/mildew.
3. The main shower area on the Personal Care Unit was observed to have ceiling
damage over the shower, and peeling wall board.
45. On or about September 16, 2002, AHCA conducted a
survey at Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited Respondent
based upon the findings below:
The facility's physical structure, including the interior and exterior walls, floors,
roof and ceilings were not ensured to be structurally sound and in good repair.
Findings include:
On the day of the survey 09/16/02, observation revealed that interior and exterior
walls, floors, roof and ceilings were not ensured to be structurally sound and in
good repair, in examples to include the following:
1. Areas of the outside walls on the south side of the building had holes in the
siding and pieces of siding were missing from the wall outside the kitchen.
2. A beam for the roof of the porch on the east side of the building had water
damaged or rotting wood.
3. Window screens throughout the facility to include the upstairs and the
courtyard were badly worn with some holes. Some screens had been removed to
place air conditioners in the windows but it could not be determined if the vents
for the old under the window air conditioners had been sealed.
4. The bathroom floor in rooms to include # 220 had badly scraped or stained
linoleum and the laundry floors, upstairs southwest was badly worn with tile
broken and pieces missing where dirt can accumulate.
5. The ceiling in rooms to include # 232 had water stains.
Repeat deficiency from survey of 7/17/01.
46. On or about November 13, 2002, Respondent
performed a follow-up to its annual survey at Respondent’s
facility. AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings
below:
The facility's physical structure, including the interior and exterior walls, floors,
roof and ceilings were not ensured to be structurally sound and in good repair.
Findings include:
On the day of the re-visit survey 1 1/13/02, observation revealed that interior and
exterior walls, floors, roof and ceilings were not ensured to be structurally sound
and in good repair, in examples to include the following:
1. Areas of the outside walls on the south side of the building had holes in the
siding and pieces of siding were missing from the wall outside the kitchen.
During interview with facility staff, the staff person stated that the facility was in
process of contracting with a company to do the repairs (the contract for repairs
was signed on 9/20/02, although not started yet. The facility did not request an
extension of time from the mandated date of correction of 10/16/02.
Repeat deficiency from survey of 7/17/01 and uncorrected from survey of
9/16/02.
47. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Rule 58A-5.023 Florida Administrative Code (2002), by
reason of the fact that Respondent failed to maintain its
structure in good and sound repair.
48. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
49. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes
of October 16, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT VIII
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
MAINTAIN ITS FURNISHINGS IN CLEAN AND GOOD REPAIR. Rule
58A-5.023 Fla.Admin.Code (2002); and Section 400.414
Fla.Stat. (2002)
50. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
51. On or about July 17, 2001, AHCA performed a
complaint investigation at Respondent’s facility. AHCA
cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based upon a tour of the facility on the day of this complaint investigation the
following furnishing were not maintained in clean and good condition.
1. The plastic dinner ware (glasses and plates) were observed to have chips,
scrapes and cracks and therefore, no longer provided a easily cleanable surface.
2. Two wheelchairs observed sitting vacant in hallways were dirty with an
accumulation of spills and caked debris on the seats.
3. The tile in the main shower area of the Personal Care Unit was observed to be
dirty with a residue build-up.
4. Soiled linen containers were stored in the main shower area of the Personal
Care Unit. One of the containers had what appeared to be soiled clothing thrown
on top of one of the container covers thereby creating a potential infection control
problem.
52. On or about September 16, 2002, AHCA conducted a
survey at Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited Respondent
based upon the findings below:
The facility did not ensure that all furniture and furnishings were clean,
functional, free-of-odors, and in good repair.
Findings include:
On the day of the survey 09/16/02, based on observation it was determined that
the facility did not ensure that all furniture and furnishings were clean, functional,
free-of-odors, and in good repair.
The sheets and spread or blanket on the bed nearest the window in the living room
area of room # 220, was urine soaked with an odor of urine from 9:45 am until
rechecked at 11:30 am. The mattress was not checked but did not appear to be
sealed in waterproof materials.
Repeat deficiency from survey of 7/17/01.
53. On or about November 13, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its survey at Respondent’s facility. AHCA
cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
The facility did not ensure that all furniture and furnishings were clean,
functional, free-of-odors, and in good repair.
Findings include:
On the day of the re-visit survey of 11/13/02, based on observation it was
determined that the facility did not ensure that all furniture and furnishings were
clean, functional, free-of-odors, and in good repair.
Although the sheets appeared clean on the bed of room 220, when the sheets were
pulled back, a very strong odor of urine appeared to emanate from the mattress.
Repeat deficiency from survey of 7/17/01 and uncorrected from the survey of
9/16/02.
54. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Rule 58A-5.023 Florida Administrative Code(2002), by reason
of the fact that Respondent failed to maintain its
furnishings in clean and good repair.
55. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
56. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes
of October 16, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT Ix
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT'S
PERSONNEL RECORDS FAILED TO INCLUDE DOCUMENTATION OF
REQUIRED TRAINING. Section 400.423 Fla.Stat.(2002); and
Section 400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
57. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
58. On or about September 16, 2002, AHCA performed a
survey at Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited Respondent
based upon the findings below:
The facility which provides special care for persons with Alzheimer's disease and
related disorders, did not ensure that facility staff who have regular contact with
or provide direct care to residents with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders,
obtained 4 hours of initial training within 3 months of employment.
Findings include:
On the day of the survey 09/16/02, a review of facility personal records revealed
that only two of eight records reviewed had documentation of the required
training.
59. On or about November 21, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its survey at Respondent’s facility. AHCA
cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
The facility which provides special care for persons with Alzheimer's disease and
related disorders, did not ensure that facility staff who have regular contact with
or provide direct care to residents with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders,
obtained 4 hours of initial training within 3 months of employment.
Findings include:
On the day of the re-visit survey 11/21/02, a review of facility personnel records
revealed that only three of ten records reviewed had documentation of the
required training.
Uncorrected from survey of 9/16/02
60. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Section 400.4178 Florida Statutes (2002), by reason of the
fact that Respondent’s personnel records failed to include
documentation of required training.
61. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
62. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes
of October 16, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT X
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD
LICENSURE. Section 400.407 Fla.Stat. (2002); and Section
400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
63. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
64. On or about September 16, 2002, AHCA performed an
extended congregate care survey at Respondent’s facility.
AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based on observation and record review the facility failed to meet the Assisted
Living license requirements.
Findings include:
Based on observation and record review on 9/16/02 the facility failed to meet the
requirements of an Assisted Living Facility. Deficiencies cited as a result of
9/16/02 visit.
65. On or about November 21, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its extended congregate care survey at
Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited Respondent based upon
the findings below:
Based on observation and record review the facility failed to meet the Assisted
Living license requirements.
Findings include:
Based on observation and record review on 11/21/02 the facility failed to meet the
requirements of an Assisted Living Facility. Deficiencies cited as a result of
9/16/02 survey and the re-visit of 11/21/02.
Uncorrected deficiency from the 9/16/02 survey
66. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Section 400.407 Florida Statutes (2002), by reason of the
fact that Respondent failed to maintain compliance with all
requirements of standard licensure.
67. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
68. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes
of October 16, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT XI
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
MAINTAIN DOCUMENTATION OF CONTINUING TRAINING FOR ITS ECC
SUPERVISOR. Section 400.4275 Fla.Stat. (2002); and Section
400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
69. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
70. On or about September 16, 2002, AHCA performed an
extended congregate care survey at Respondent’s facility.
AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based on record review the facility failed to provide documentation of continuing
education training for the Extended Congregate Care Supervisor.
Findings included:
The facility failed to provide personnel records of the Extended Congregate Care
Supervisor to document continuing education requirements.
71. On or about November 21, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its extended congregate care survey at
Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited Respondent based upon
the findings below:
Based on record review on 11/21/02 the facility failed to provide documentation
of continuing education training for the Extended Congregate Care Supervisor.
Findings included:
Record review of interview with the administrator on the date of this re-visit
revealed that there was no documentation available at the facility to verify that the
Extended Congregate Care supervisor met the required continuing education
requirements. The documentation available reflected that the ECC supervisor
only attended a core training on 2/26/99. No further training updates verification
was available for review.
Uncorrected from the survey of 9/16/02.
72. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Section 400.4275 Florida Statutes (2002), by reason of the
fact that Respondent failed to maintain documentation of
required continuing training for its ECC supervisor.
73. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class TII violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(1)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
74. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes
of October 16, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
COUNT XII
RESPONDENT DEPRIVED RESIDENTS OF THE FACILITY OF CIVIL OR
LEGAL RIGHTS, OF BENEFITS OR PRIVILEGES GUARANTEED BY LAW,
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. RESPONDENT FAILED TO
MAINTAIN DOCUMENTATION OF REQUIRED TRAINING FOR ITS ECC
STAFF. Section 400.407 Fla.Stat.(2002); and Section
400.414 Fla.Stat. (2002)
75. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs one (1) through six (6) above as if fully set
forth herein.
76. On or about September 16, 2002, AHCA performed an
extended congregate care survey at Respondent’s facility.
AHCA cited Respondent based upon the findings below:
Based on record review the facility failed to document the training of the
Extended Congregate Care staff.
Findings included:
Based on record review the facility had not provided in-service training or
documented any of the required in-service training for its Extended Congregate
Care staff.
77. On or about November 21, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up to its extended congregate care survey at
Respondent’s facility. AHCA cited Respondent based upon
the findings below:
Based on record review the facility failed to document the training of the
Extended Congregate Care staff.
Findings included:
Based on record review for ten sampled personnel records on the date of this
revisit, the facility had not provided in-service training or documented any of the
required in-service training for eight of ten Extended Congregate Care staff.
Uncorrected from the survey of 9/16/02.
78. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated
Section 400.407 Florida Statutes (2002), by reason of the
fact that Respondent failed to provide documentation or
evidence that its ECC staff had received the required
training.
79. The foregoing violation constitutes a Class III
violation. Class "III" violations are those conditions or
occurrences related to the operation and maintenance of a
facility or to the personal care of residents which the
agency determines indirectly or potentially threaten the
physical or emotional health, safety, or security of the
facility residents, other than class I or class II
violations. As a class III violation, and pursuant to
Section 400.419(i)(c), Florida Statutes, AHCA may give a
citation for the violation, which citation specifies the
time within which the violation is required to be
corrected. After the time for correction has expired, and
if the problem is not corrected, a class III violation is
subject to an administrative fine of not less than $500 and
of not more than $1000 for each violation. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
80. The facility was given a mandated correction date
in accordance with Section 400.419(1) (c), Florida Statutes
of October 16, 2002.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief:
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
Dated: January 23, 2003
Agency for Health Care Administration
es . pon
Senior Attorney
Fla. Bar. No. 0174629
NOTICE
Respondent, LARGO ACLF, LTD., D/B/A THE HOMESTEAD OF LARGO
hereby is notified that Respondent has a right to request
an administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes (2001). Specific options for
administrative action are set out in the attached Election
of Rights form and explained in the attached Explanation of
Rights form. All requests for a hearing shall be sent to
AHCA, Jodi C. Page, Esquire, Senior Attorney, Agency for
Health Care Administration, 2727 Mahan Drive, Building 3,
Mail Stop #3, Tallahassee, Florida, 32308.
In order to preserve your right to a hearing, your Election
of Rights in this matter must be received by AHCA within
twenty-one (21) days from the date you receive the
Administrative Complaint. If the election of rights form
with your selected option is not received by AHCA within
twenty-one (21) days from the date of your receipt of the
Administrative Complaint, a final order will be issued
finding the deficiencies and/or violations charged and
imposing the penalty sought in the Complaint.
Dated: January 23, 2003
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION
Jodi > Page, Toye
Senior Attorney
Fla. Bar. No. 0174629
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
Administrative Complaint has been sent by Certified Mail
(#71064575129420500750) to The Homestead of Largo, 750
Starkey Road, Largo, Florida 33771, this 23rd day of
January, 2003.
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION
Senior Attorney
Fla. Bar. No. 0174629
2727 Mahan Drive, MS#3
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(850) 921-6362 (office)
(850) 921-0158 (fax)
Docket for Case No: 03-001667
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 16, 2005 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel and Request for Service (filed by B. Mulligan, Esquire). |
Mar. 16, 2005 |
Motion to Re-open Formal Administrative Proceeding (filed by Petitioner). |
Aug. 11, 2003 |
Order Severing DOAH Case No. 03-1667 (from 03-1666).
|
Aug. 11, 2003 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Aug. 08, 2003 |
Joint Motion to Hold in Abeyance (Case 03-1666) filed via facsimile.
|
Aug. 08, 2003 |
Joint Motion to Reliquish Jurisdiction (Case 03-1667) filed via facsimile.
|
Aug. 06, 2003 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
May 21, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for August 13 and 14, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Largo, FL).
|
May 21, 2003 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
May 20, 2003 |
Order Granting Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 03-001666, 03-001667)
|
May 13, 2003 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
May 09, 2003 |
Initial Order issued.
|
May 08, 2003 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
May 08, 2003 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
May 08, 2003 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|