Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: NICOLAS & SHERRI CICCARELLO, D/B/A SHARICK`S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: St. Petersburg, Florida
Filed: Jun. 17, 2003
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, September 19, 2003.
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, AHCA No.: 20020%45089 4
Return Receipt Requested: aa
Vv. 7000 1670 0011 4849 3265 \
7000 1670 0011 4849 3272
NICOLAS & SHERRI CICCARELLO (OWNERS) 7 a
d/b/a SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT O%>- DIY
RANCH,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(hereinafter “AHCA” or the “Agency”), by and through the
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint
against Nicolas & Sherri Ciccarello, Owners of Sharick’s Deck
Retirement Ranch (hereinafter “Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch” or the “facility”), pursuant to Chapter 400, Part IIT,
and Section 120.60, Florida Statutes, (2001), and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose and maintain the
Agency’s administrative fine of $8,000.00, pursuant to Section
400.419, Florida Statutes (2001), for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Sections
120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 28-166,
Florida Admiristrative Code.
3. Venue lies in Hillsborough County, pursuant to
Section 120.57, Fla. Stat. and Rule 28-106.207, Florida
Administrative Code.
PARTIES
4. AHCA is the regulatory authority responsible for
licensure and enforcement of all applicable statutes and rules
governing assisted living facilities, pursuant to Chapter 400,
Part III, Florida Statutes (2001), and Chapter 58A-5, Florida
Administrative Code.
5, Sharick’s Deck Retirement Ranch operates a 25-bed
assisted living facility located at 4506 Bruton Road, Plant
City, Florida 33565. Sharick‘s Deck Retirement Ranch is
licensed as an assisted living facility license number AL5335,
with an expiration date of September 3, 2003. Sharick’s Deck
Retirement Ranch was at all times material hereto a licensed
facility under the licensing authority of AHCA and was
required to comply with all applicable rules and statutes.
COUNT I
SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH WAS PROVIDING SERVICES AT A
LOCATION THAT IS NOT LICENSED/NOT INCLUDED IN IT’S LICENSE.
Rule 58A-5.016(3),(4),(5), Florida Administrative Code, and/or
400.407(1), Fla. Stat.
(GENERAL LICENSE STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
6. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
7. During the complaint investigation conducted on May
3, 2002 and based on a tour of the facility, on a review of
available documentation and on interview with two employees,
the Agency found that Sharick’s Deck Retirement Ranch was
providing services at a location that is not licensed/not
included in it’s license. The facility is providing personal
care services for one individual who is living in = an
unlicensed building on the facility grounds. A review of the
facility's Medication Observation Record (MOR) indicated that
28 residents are receiving supervision with their medications;
however, the facility is only licensed for 25 residents. When
the whereabouts of these 28 individuals was discussed with two
facility employees on 05/03/02 at 1:20 p.m., it was revealed
that one individual for whom the facility is supervising
medications lives in a "shed" or "apartment" on the facility
grounds. This building is not a licensed portion of the ALF,
however. Time given for correction: 05/13/02.
8. During a follow-up survey conducted on 6/14/02 ard
based on a tour of the facility, on interview with two
employees and on interview with one resident, the Agency again
found that Sharick’s Deck Retirement Ranch was providing
services at a location that is not licensed/not included in
it’s license. The facility is providing personal care
services for one individual who is living in an unlicensed
building on the facility grounds. During a review of
medications in the medication cart on 06/14/2002, medications
prescribed for one resident were noted to be in the medication
cart but no corresponding pages were in the Medication
Observation Record. An employee stated that the medications
were kept there for one individual who lives in an unlicensed
"apartment" on the facility grounds. During an interview with
the resident, SB, on 06/14/2002 at 8:30 a.m., the resident
stated that when it is time for his medications, he goes to
the main building where staff take the medications out of the
medication cart and "give them to (him.)" Because a personal
care service is being provided to this individual, he must
reside in a licensed portion of the facility. This is an
uncorrected violation.
9. Based on the foregoing, Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch violated Rule 58A-5.016(3), (4), (5), F.A.C., and/or
Section 400.407(1), Fla. Stat, an uncorrected Class III
violation pursuant to Section 400.419(1) (c), Fla. Stat., which
carries, in this case, an assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT II
SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH EXCEEDED THE LICENSED CAPACITY
400.407(3), Fla. Stat. and /or 58A-5.0181(2) (g), F.A.C.
(GENERAL LICENSE STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
10. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
11. During the complaint investigation conducted by the
Agency on 5/03/02 and based on a review of resident records
and on interviews with two facility staff, the Agency found
that the number of residents at the facility exceeded its
licensed capacity. A review of the pages in the facility
Medication Ooservation Record indicated that medications were
being supervised by facility staff for 29 residents. However,
the facility is licensed for only 25 residents. This was
discussed at length with the two staff members on 05/03/02 at
1:30 p.m.; the names of the residents were discussed
individually to determine if the residents were, in fact,
residents of the facility or if personal services (such as
supervision of medications) were being performed by facility
staff. It was indicated that one resident had been in the
hospital since 04/20/02, but that he had not been given a
discharge notice and was expected to return; and that one
an
resident did not live in the licensed ALF but on the grounds
and that he received no services except for his supervision cf
medication. The other 27 residents were confirmed by the two
employees as currently residing within the licensed facility.
Time given for correction: 05/03/02.
12. When a follow-up visit was conducted on 6/14/02 and
based on a tour of the facility, on interview with two
employees and on interview with one resident, the Agency again
found that the number of residents at the facility exceeded
its licensed capacity. The facility is providing personal
care services for one individual who is living in an
unlicensed building on the facility’s grounds. During a
review of medications in the medication cart on 06/14/2002,
medications prescribed for one resident were noted to be in
the medication cart but no corresponding pages were in the
Medication Observation Record. An employee stated that tare
medications were kept there for one individual who lives in an
unlicensed "apartment" on the facility grounds. During an
interview with the resident, SB, on 06/14/2002 at 8:30 a.m.,
the resident stated that when it is time for his medications,
he goes to the main building where staff take the medications
out of the medication cart and "give them to (him.)" Because
a personal care service is being provided to this individual,
he must reside in a licensed portion of the facility, and be
counted as a resident. Including this resident, the facility
exceeded its licensed capacity of 25 residents. This is an
uncorrected violation.
13. Based on the foregoing, Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch violated Chapter 400.407(3), Fla. Stat, and/or Rule 58A-
5.0181(2) (g), Florida Administrative Code, an uncorrected
Class III violation pursuant to Section 400.419(1)(c), Fla.
Sctat., which carries, in this case, an assessed fine of
$1,000.00.
COUNT III
SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH FAILED TO MAINTAIN AND/OR
DOCUMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE.
400.4275(3), Fla. Stat. and/or 58A-5.021(8) and 58A-
5.024(1)(g), F.A.C.
(FACILITY RECORDS STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
14. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
15. During the complaint investigation conducted by the
Agency on 5/03/02 and based on 4 review of available
documentation, the Agency found that the facility failed to
maintain and/or document liability insurance coverage, as the
facility does not currently have a liability insurance policy
in place. A review of the most recent policy available
indicated that the insurance coverage expired 05/02/02, the
day preceding the visit to the facility. Time given for
correction: 06/03/02.
16. When the follow-up visit was conducted on 6/14/02
and based on a review of available documentation, the Agency
again found that the facility failed to maintain and/or
document liability insurance coverage, as the facility does
not currently have a liability insurance policy in place
and/or does not have documentation of liability insurance. A
review of the most recent policy available indicated that the
insurance coverage expired 05/02/02. Despite a diligent
search by one employee, no replacement policy was located. In
telephone conversation with the Administrator on 06/19, he
indicated that liability insurance had been obtained and
indicated he would fax a copy to the surveyor. As of the
writing (of the form 3020), no such insurance verification has
been received. This is an uncorrected violation.
17. Based on the foregoing, Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch violated Chapter 400.4275(3), Fla. Stat, and/or Rules
58A-5.021(8), and 58A-5.024(1)(g), Florida Administrative
Code, an uncorrected Class III violation pursuant to Section
400.419(1) (c), Fla. Stat.,, which carries, in this case, an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT IV
SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH FAILED TO MAINTAIN A DAILY UP-
TO-DATE MEDICATION OBSERVATION RECORD (MOR) FOR EACH RESIDENT.
58A-5.0185(5) (b), F.A.C.
(MEDICATION STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
18. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
23. During the complaint investigation conducted by the
Agency on 5/03/02 and based on a review of the Medication
Ooservation Record for 29 residents, the Agency found that the
facility failed to maintain a daily up-to-date Medication
Observation Record (MOR) for each resident. The MOR was not
up-to-date for one resident. One resident had been admitted
to the hospital on 04/20/02, according to staff members;
however, his chart had been marked through 05/04/02, the day
after the survey, to indicate he was still in the hospital.
When asked why such a "future entry" had been made, the
employee in charge of the daily med pass stated, on 05/03/92
at 11:15 a.m., that she had made the entry "so that the other
staff wouldn't write anything there." Time given for
Correction: 5/13/02.
24, When the follow-up visit was conducted on 6/14/02
and based on a review of the Medication Observation Record for
26 residents, the Agency again found that the facility failed
to maintain a daily up-to-date Medication Observation Record
(MOR) for each resident. The MOR was not up-to-date for 25
residents. A review of the MOR on 06/14/02 at 11:00 a.m.
revealed that no entries were made for any resident for any
administraticn of morning meds. When asked why the MOR was
left blank for these entries, one employee stated that she
didn't know, that the meds were administered before she
arrived at work that morning. Interviews with three residents
indicated that the morning medications had, in fact, been
given to the residents. This is an uncorrected violation.
25. Based on the foregoing, Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch violated Rule 58A-5.0185(5) (b), Florida Administrative
Code, an uncorrected Class III violation pursuant to Section
400.419(1) (c}, Fla. Stat., which carries, in this case, an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT V
SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH FAILED TO KEEP CENTRALLY
STORED MEDICATIONS IN A LOCKED AREA
58A-5.0185(6) (b)2., F.A.C.
(MEDICATION STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
26. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as of fully set forth herein.
27. During a complaint investigation conducted by the
Agency on 5/03/02 and based on a tour of the facility, the
Agency found that the facility failed to keep centrally stored
medications in a locked area, locked away from residents eét
all times. Upon entry to the facility on 05/03/02 at 10:45
a.m., a review was made of the facility's med cart, where the
residents' medications are kept. The cart was locked;
however, placed on top of the med cart, within reach of any
passing individual, was a pill organizer; this pill organizer
contained medications for two residents. Time given for
correction: 5/03/02.
28. When the follow-up visit was conducted on 6/14/02
and based on a tour of the facility, the Agency again found
that the facility failed to keep centrally stored medications
in a locked area, locked away from residents at all times.
Upon entry to the facility on 06/14/02 at 10:45 a.m., a review
was made of the facility's med cart, where the residents!
medications are kept. The cart was not locked, and a cabinet
in which extra medications are kept had an open lock hanging
from the door-- the lock was not "locked." This is an
uncorrected violation.
29, Based on the foregoing, Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch violated Rule 58A-5.0185(6) (b)2., Florida Administrative
Code, an uncorrected Class III violation pursuant to Section
400.419(1) (c), Fla. Stat., which carries, in this case, an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT VI
SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH FAILED TO HAVE SCHEDULED
ACTIVITIES FOR RESIDENTS
58A-5.0182(2) (c), F.A.C.
{RESIDENT CARE STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
30, AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
31. During the complaint investigation conducted on
5/03/02 and based on observation and on interviews with a
facility employee and with two residents, the agency found
that the facility failed to have scheduled activities for the
residents. During the survey, residents were observed to be
sleeping, watching television or outside smoking; there were
no "activities" observed. When asked what was available for
residents to do, two residents replied, "nothing" and
"watching TV". When asked on 05/03/02 at 12:35 p.m. whether
the facility had any scheduled activities for the residents,
one employee stated, "no. Time given for correction:
5/13/02.
) 32. During the follow-up visit conducted on 6/14/02 and
based on observation and on interviews with a facility
employee and with two residents, the Agency again found that
the facility does not have scheduled activities for the
residents. During the survey, residents were observed to be
12
sleeping, watching television or outside smoking; there were
no "activities" observed. When asked what was available for
residents to do, two residents replied "nothing" and "watch
Ty". When asked on 06/14/02 at 10:00 a.m. whether the
facility had any scheduled activities for the residents, one
employee stated replied in the negative. The employee stated
that she had recently purchased and brought to the facility
some games and puzzles for the residents, that a volunteer was
helping with activities and that "a couple" of the residents
did handicrafts, but she acknowledged that there were no
scheduled activities. This is an uncorrected violation.
33. Based on the foregoing, Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch violated Rule 58A-5.0182(2)(c), Florida Administrative
Code, an uncorrected Class III violation pursuant to Section
400.419(1) (c), Fla. Stat., which carries, in this case, an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT VII
SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH FAILED TO POST AN ACTIVITIES
CALENDAR IN COMMON AREAS WHERE RESIDENTS NORMALLY CONGREGATE .
58A-5.0182(2) (c), F.A.C.
(RESIDENT CARE STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
34, AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
36. During the complaint investigation conducted on
5/03/02 and based on a tour of the facility and on interview
with one employee, the Agency found that the facility failed
to post an activities calendar in common areas where residents
normally congregate. When asked whether the facility had ary
scheduled activities for the residents, on 05/03/02 at 12:35
p.m., or if there was an activities calendar somewhere showing
what activities the facility had scheduled for the residents,
one staff member stated, "no." Time given for correction:
05/13/02.
37. When a follow up was conducted on 6/14/02 and based
on a tour of the facility and on interview with one employee,
the Agency again found that the facility failed to post an
activities calendar in common areas where residents normally
congregate. When asked whether the facility had any scheduled
activities for the residents, on 06/14/02 at 10:00 a.m., or if
there was an activities calendar somewhere showing what
activities the facility had scheduled for the residents, one
staff member stated, "no," but that she had intended to make
cne that morning, prior to the survey. This is an uncorrected
violation.
38. Based on the foregoing, Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch violated Rule 58A-5.0182(2) (c), Florida Administrative
Code, an uncorrected Class III violation pursuant to Section
14
400.419(1) (c), Fla. Stat., which carries, in this case, an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
COUNT VIII
SHARICK’S DECK RETIREMENT RANCH FAILED TO HAVE/DOCUMENT ANNUAL
TUBERCULOSIS TESTS FOR ALL EMPLOYEES.
58A-5.019(2) (a), F.A.C.
(STAFF RECORDS STANDARDS)
UNCORRECTED CLASS III VIOLATION
39, AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
40. During the complaint investigation conducted on
5/03/02 and based on a review of two employee files, the
Agency found that the facility failed to have/document annual
tuberculosis test for all employees. Neither file contained
documentation of the employee's freedom from tuberculosis,
obtained on an annual basis. The file of one long-time
employee contained a TB statement dated 08/22/00; the file of
one other employee, date of application 12/04/01, did not
contain any documentation to ensure that the employee was free
from Tuberculosis. Time given for correction: 06/03/02.
41. During the follow-up visit conducted on 6/14/02 and
based on a review of two employee files, the Agency again
found that the facility failed to have/document annual
tuberculosis test for all employees. Neither file contained
documentation of the employee's freedom from tuberculosis,
Cc. Grant such other relief as this Court deems is
just and proper.
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes (2001). Specific options for
administrative action are set out in the attached Election of
Rights and explained in the attached Explanation of Rights.
All requests for hearing shall be made to the Agency for
Health Care Administration, and delivered to the Agency for
Health Care Administration, Manchester Building, First Floor,
8355 N. W. 53rd Street, Miami, Florida, 33166; Attn: Kathryn
F. Fenske.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO REQUEST A
HEARING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT WILL
RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT
AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
Respectfully submitted,
Kathryn F. Fenske, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel
Agency for Health Care
Administration
Florida Bar # 0142832
8355 N. W. 53 Street
Miami, Florida 33166
(305) 499-2165
17
obtained on an annual basis. The file of one long-time
employee contained a TB statement dated 08/22/00; the file cf
one other employee, date of application 12/04/01, did not
contain any documentation to ensure that the employee was free
from Tubercu_osis. In an interview conducted on 06/14/02 at
12:00 p.m., one employee stated that a home health agency had
been contacted by the facility and was scheduled to come to
the facility and perform TB tests on the staff on 06/26/02.
This is an uncorrected violation.
42. Based on the foregoing, Sharick’s Deck Retirement
Ranch violated Rule 58A-5.019(2) (a), Florida Administrative
Code, an uncorrected Class III violation pursuant to Section
400.419(1) (c), Fla. Stat., which carries, in this case, an
assessed fine of $1,000.00.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner, State of Florida Agency for
Health Care Administration requests the following relief:
A. Make factual and legal findings in favor of tne
Agency on Counts I through VII.
B. Assess and maintain the Agency’s administrative
fine totaling $8,000.00 against Sharick’s Deck Retiremeat
Ranch on Counts I through VIII for the uncorrected Class III
violations, pursuant to 400.419(1) (c), Fla. Stat.
16
Copies furnished to:
Patricia Reid Caufman
Field Office Manager
Agency for Health Care Administration
525 Mirror Lake Drive
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
(U.S. Mail)
Jean Lombardi
Finance and Accounting
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #14
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Inter-office Mail)
Assisted Living Facility Unit Program
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #30
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested to Nicolas Antonio Ciccarello,
Administrator, Sharick’s Deck Retirement Ranch, 4506 Bruton
Road, Plant City, Florida 33565, and to Nicolas & Sherri
Ciccarello, 4806 Lonesome Dove Court, Plant City, Florida
33565 on _ Cipedl , 2003.
KatKhryn F. Fenske, Esq.
Docket for Case No: 03-002248
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Nov. 18, 2004 |
Motion to Re-open Formal Administration Proceeding filed by Petitioner.
|
Sep. 19, 2003 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 18, 2003 |
Joint Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Sep. 17, 2003 |
Order Denying Continuance.
|
Sep. 11, 2003 |
Motion for Continuance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Aug. 21, 2003 |
Notice and Certificate of Service of Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories to Respondent and Request for Production (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 09, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 22 and 23, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg, FL).
|
Jul. 09, 2003 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jul. 09, 2003 |
Order Granting Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 03-002248, 03-002249, 03-002250)
|
Jul. 03, 2003 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel and Request for Service (filed by W. Knight, Esquire, via facsimile).
|
Jul. 01, 2003 |
Joint Response to Initial Order and Motion to Consolidate (cases requested to be consolidated 03-2248, 03-2249, 03-2250) (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jun. 18, 2003 |
Initial Order.
|
Jun. 17, 2003 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jun. 17, 2003 |
Election of Rights for Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jun. 17, 2003 |
Notice of Appearance/Amendment to the Request for Hearing (filed by C. O`Rourke, Esquire).
|
Jun. 17, 2003 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|