Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: ARBOR LIVING CENTERS OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA AT LAKE WORTH
Judges: FLORENCE SNYDER RIVAS
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Lake Worth, Florida
Filed: Jul. 16, 2003
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, July 28, 2003.
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
An
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE in
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, AHCA No.: 2002045447
Return Receipt Requested:
Vv. 7000 1670 0011 4845 8141
7000 1670 0011 4845 8158
ARBOR LIVING CENTERS OF FLORIDA, 7000 1670 0011 4845 8165
INC. d/b/a INTEGRATED HEALTH -
SERVICES OF FLORIDA AT LAKE WORTH, Od- D5GR
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(hereinafter “AHCA”), by and through the undersigned
counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint against
Arbor Living Centers of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Integrated
Health Services of Florida at Lake Worth (hereinafter
“Integrated Health Services of Florida at Lake Worth”),
pursuant to Chapter 400, Part II, and Section 120.60,
Florida Statutes, (2001), and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose an administrative
fine of $8,000.00 pursuant to Section 400.23(8), Florida
Statutes (2001), for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2, AHCA has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 400,
Part II, Florida Statutes (2001).
3. Venue lies in Palm Beach County, pursuant to
Section Rule 28-106.207, Florida Administrative Code.
PARTIES
4. AHCA is the regulatory authority responsible for
licensure and enforcement of all applicable statutes and
rules governing skilled nursing facilities, pursuant to
Chapter 400, Part II, Florida Statutes (2001), and Chapter
59A-4 Florida Administrative Code.
5. Integrated Health Services of Florida at Lake
Worth operates a 120-bed skilled nursing facility located
at 1201 12 Avenue South, Lake Worth, Florida 33460.
Integrated Health Services of Florida at Lake Worth is
licensed as a skilled nursing facility under license number
SNF13010961. Integrated Health Services of Florida at Léke
Worth was at all times material hereto a licensed facility
“under the licensing authority of AHCA and was required to
comply with all applicable rules and statutes.
COUNT I
INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA AT LAKE WORTH FAILED
TO THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATE SUSPECTED ABUSE OF A RESIDENT WHO
HAD A PURPLE BRUISE TO CHEEK.
TITLE 42 CHAPTER 483.25(h) (2), CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATION
59A-4.1288 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
(STAFF TREATMENT)
CLASS III
6. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
7. Integrated Health Services of Florida at Léke
Worth participated in Title XVIII or Title XIX and
therefore must follow certification rules and regulations
found in Chapter 42 Code of Federal Regulation 482.
8. Integrated Health Services of Florida at Léke
Worth was cited with four (4) Class III deficiencies
pursuant to survey conducted on June 4, 2002.
9. Based on the survey conducted on May 1, 2002 énd
based upon staff interview and documentation review the
facility did not develop and implement policies and
procedures for abuse. Findings include the following.
10. On 4-29-02, 2 housekeepers and 1 certified
nursing assistant were asked about the abuse protocol.
None of the three were able to name the abuse coordinator
or what to do if abuse was witnessed. On 4-29-02 the
policies and procedures for the abuse program were
requested from administration. The policies and procedures
were reviewed, and revealed that the first paragraph
states, "To further enhance our commitment to excellence,
IHS has developed and implemented a training program that
educates our staff on how to protect and prevent abuse
from: Staff - Visitors - Other Residents" Under # 2, the
third bullet states, "In-servicing, training and
reinforcement for all new and present employees” that
identifies all aspects of abuse prohibition." Throughout
the rest of the survey, 8 staff members (1 licensed
practical nurse, 2 registered nurses, 1 maintenance person,
2 dietary staff and 2 certified nursing assistants) were
interviewed to reveal that 4 were not able to identify the
abuse coordinator and/or what to do if abuse is witnessed.
The seven individuals, who were not aware of the abuse
protocol, were not able to discuss what constitutes abuse,
neglect or misappropriation of resident property. The
correction date was designated as May 31, 2002.
11. During the follow-up survey conducted on June 4,
2002 based on observation, interview, and clinical record
review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure
that suspected abuse was thoroughly investigated for one
resident in the survey sample. Findings include che
following.
12. Clinical record review was conducted during the
revisit to the annual survey on June 06, 2002. Resident # 6
was observed on June 06, 2002, with a purple bruise to the
left cheek. The resident was sitting in his/her bed. The
resident was asked what had happened, but appeared confused
and was unable to tell the surveyor how he/she got the
bruise. Clinical record review revealed this resident was
admitted into the facility on April 14, 2002. Documentation
in the record, in the form of a pressure ulcer report/other
skin condition report documented a bruise on the residents
left cheek, and bruises on both arms. The date listed for
when the bruises were first noticed by staff was May 21,
2002. The nursing notes, physician notes, and social
service notes were reviewed, but no documentation could be
found about the bruises, how the resident received them, or
whether an investigation of the occurrence had taken place.
The nursing admission assessment does not list the resident
as having bruises to the face or arms. The Director of
Nursing was asked for an incident report and investigation
of the bruises, but none could be provided to the surveyor.
The social worker stated that the resident had the bruises
on admission, but no documentation cculd be found to
wn
support the statement. The facility did not investigate an
incident possibly related to abuse.
13. Based on the foregoing facts, Integrated Health
Services of Florida at Lake Worth violated Chapter 59A-
4.1288 Florida Administrative Code and 483.25(h) (2), Code
of Federal Regulation herein classified as a Class III
deficiency, which warrants a fine of $2,000.00.
COUNT II
INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA AT LAKE WORTH FAILED
TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE POST MORTEM CARE FOR ONE (1)
RESIDENT AND DID NOT PROVIDE PRIVACY DURING TREATMENT FOR
ANOTHER RESIDENT.
TITLE 42 CHAPTER 483.25(h) (2), CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATION
AS INCORPORATED BY RULE 59A-4.1288 FLA. ADMIN. CODE
SECTIONS 400.022(1) (a)& 400.022(1) (m), FLORIDA STATUTES
(QUALITY OF LIFE)
CLASS III
14. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
15. Integrated Health Services of Florida at Lake
Worth participated in Title XVIII or Title xXIx and
therefore must follow certification rules and regulations
found in Chapter 42 Code of Federal Regulation 482.
16. Based on survey conducted on May 1, 2002 and
based upon observation, interviews witn the resident's
group, individual resident interviews, and family
interviews, it was determined the facility did not promote
care for residents that maintains or enhances dignity and
respect for all of the residents in the facility. Findings
include the following.
17. During the group interview on 4-30-02 at
approximately 10:30 AM, 10 of 11 residents reported they
are emotionally upset that the members of the staff speak a
foreign language in their presence. It must be noted that
all units of the nursing home were represented at the group
meeting. The following are examples of incidents which
have happened in the last two or more months.
18. One resident reported that two or three certified
nursing assistants come into his/her room and speak a
language other than English. He/she said that" they laugh
and look at him". He/she said," it is very degrading and
that he/she feels "lousy" when this is done". He/she
stated," this happens often".
19. Two residents reported that the certified nursing
assistants speak in their native foreign language and point
at them as if the certified nursing assistants are talking
about them. The residents said," on many occasions the
certified nursing assistants laugh while they are pointing
at the residents". One of these residents said to the
surveyor, "how would you feel about that happening to you?"
These two residents reported that speaking in the foreign
language goes on daily.
20. Three residents reported that two or three
certified nursing assistants go into a room of a bed bound
resident and talk in their native foreign language and
laugh while in there. The residents reported that the
certified nursing assistants could be heard from the hall.
21. A resident in the group meeting stated, "It is
hard enough for us to listen to the foreign language, but
what about the people who can't speak for themselves. How
can we protect them?"
22. Several residents, who have been at the facility
for six months or more, reported that this has been going
on as long as they have been at the facility.
23. Resident group minutes were reviewed with the
permission of the president of the resicent council. For
the month of March, the residents addressed the issue of
staff speaking in a foreign language so it could be
addressed by administration. The residents reported that
this has been brought up many times in the past.
24. An interview with a resident who was oriented
times three revealed that he/she has personally asked the
certified nursing assistants to speak English. He/she
said," the request didn't do any good; they still speak
their own language".
25. On 4-29-02 during the noon meal, resident #8 was
brought into the dining room complaining that her foot was
cold. One foot had a sock on it and the other did not. She
reported that she wanted socks on both feet.
26. The family of resident # 9 was interviewed and
revealed that they requested, many times, to have their
loved one's finger nails cleaned. Every time when they
come to visit (2 times per week) the nails are always
dirty.
27. The family of resident # 9 reported that when
they come in to the facility to visit their loved one, they
always have to request the he/she be bathed because of the
body odor.
28. Based on observation on 4/29/02 at 12:45 PM in
room 251, it was determined that resident #2 had no
clothing hanging in the closet and was dressed in bed in a
hospital gown. Additionally, it was observed that this
resident was aphasic, cognitively impaired, contracted and
received nutrition via PEG tube. A subsequent record
review revealed resident #2 had no family other than a son
residing in Arizona. The following mornirg it was observed
that the resident was dressed in bed in a hospital gown.
An interview with the social worker at 10 AM revealed the
resident had no clothing in the room nor in the facility
laundry. At 10:15 AM the social worker found some unmarked
clothing with no name marked on the garments, and hung them
in the room 251 closet for resident #2. On the third cay
of the survey (05/1/02), it was observed by the surveyor
that this resident was still in bed dressed in a hospital
gown.
29. While touring the facility at 10:34 am on April
29, 2002 a surveyor noted that a C.N.A. on the second flcor
entered a resident room without knocking on the door or
waiting for the resident to respond. The L.P.N. who was
touring with the surveyor and the C.N.A. were informed of
this finding at the time of its occurrence.
30. While observing medication pass between 9:40 AM
and 9:45 AM on April 30, 2002 a surveyor noted that
Resident #4 was wearing a white sweater, which had a fist-
sized hole in the right arm. This finding was reviewed
with and substantiated by the Director of Social Services
at 9:53 AM on April 30, 2002, and the Director of Nursing
at 10:25 AM on April 30, 2002.
31. On 04/29/2002, during the initial tour of the c
Wing, Resident ID # 5 was heard calling for" help”. As the
initial tour continued, resident #5 was heard, continually,
10
calling for "help". Upon entering the resident's room with
the door ajar, the resident was observed lying on the floor
in front of the wheel chair, clad in an incontinent brief
and as blouse. When the facility staff (2) was questioned
as to why the resident was not wearing clothing on lower
part of the body, the 2 staff persons replied, "I dor't
know". The correction date was designated as May 31, 2002.
32. Based on follow-up survey conducted on June 4,
2002 and based upon observation and interviews with staff,
the facility did not maintain dignity and respect for 1
‘Resident #11) of 12 sampled residents and 2 (Residents #3
and #14) of 3 random residents. Findings include the
following.
33. During the tour on 6-4-02 at approximately 10:00
am the door to room 125 was open. A certified nursing
assistant was finishing shaving Resident #14 who resides in
the window bed. He was sitting in his wheel chair
approximately 4 feet out side of the bathroom. His head
was turned to the left facing the resident in the door bed.
When the surveyor knocked and entered the open door, she
passed Resident #14 and went to the bedside of resident #
ll whose privacy curtain was open to the bottom of the bed
on the side facing to door. The resident in the door bed
(resident # 11) had expired at approximately 6:00 am. The
ll
expired resident had not been transferred to a funeral home
during this time, as the spouse had not decided which
funeral home to use. A review of the facility's policy for
cost-mortem care was reviewed and _ the following was
determined.
34. The facility's policy for "The Care of the Body
After Death" states the following:
"Have body placed in a private room or have roommate
moved to another area as body is being prepared."
"Close room door or draw bedside curtain."
"Tf the person wore dentures, reinsert them. If mouth
fails to close, place a rolled-up towel urder the chin."
"Place small pillow or folded towel on the head or
elevate head of bed 10 to 15 degrees."
"Maintains dignity and respect for the client and
significant others."
None the above was executed in regards to Resident
#11, which allowed anyone entering the room to observe the
expired resident.
35. The expired resident and his roommate did not
have their dignity and respect maintained in death
(Resident #11) as well as in life (Resident #14).
36. During tour at approximately 10:15 am the door to
room 104 was closed. The surveyor knocked and was told to
enter. Resident #13 was sitting on the bed by the door in
his incontinent brief with his G-tubing exposed receiving
am care without the benefit of his cubicle curtain closed
12
for privacy and dignity. The roommate was in his wheel
chair on the side of his window bed observing the care
given to Resident #13.
37. Based on the foregoing facts, Integrated Health
Services of Florida at bake Worth violated Section
400.022(1) (a), Florida Statutes, herein classified as a
Class III deficiency, which warrants a fine of $2,000.00.
COUNT III
INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA AT LAKE WORTH FAILED
TO PROVIDE SOCIAL SERVICES TO TWO (2) RESIDENTS - ONE WITH
A ROOMMATE ISSUE AND ONE WITH FINANCIAL ISSUES.
TITLE 42 CHAPTER 483.25(h) (2), CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATION
59A-4.1288 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
SECTION 400.022(1) (n),(2), FLORIDA STATUTES
(QUALITY OF LIFE)
CLASS III
38. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
39. Integrated Health Services of Florida at Lake
Worth participated in Title XVIII or Title XIX and
therefore must follow certification rules and regulations
found in Chapter 42 Code of Federal Regulation 482.
40. Based on survey conducted on May 1, 2002 and
based upon on observations, record reviews and interviews,
it was determined the facility did not provide medically-
related social services for 2 of 21 sampled residents (#15,
#18), and 2 of 14 random residents (#25, #26), to meet the
psychosocial well-being of each resident. The findings
include the following.
41. During the initial tour of the facility on
4/29/02 at 10:45 am, the nursing staff touring with tae
surveyor reported that resident #18 was a "racist" and was
only 62 years old. In addition, the surveyor was informed
that resident #18 refused to get out of bed and complained
"all the time." Observations in room 249 during the tour
revealed the resident appeared to be alert, oriented and
was watching TV while in bed. Based on record review on
5/1/02 on the second floor, it was determined resident #18
was admitted 3/5/01, and readmitted on 12/22/01, and has
diagnoses of depressive disorder, anxiety, muscular
dystrophy, stroke and hypertension. A review of the most
recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed
the resident exhibited a sad, pained, worried expression,
resisted care, and could be abusive. Continued record
review revealed the resident received a psychiatric consult
on 2/2/02. At the time of this consult a diagnosis of
psychotic disorder was determined by the physician, and the
medication Risperdal was ordered. Review of this consult
also indicated resident #18 was "very paranoid and accused
staff of plotting to intentionally harm him/her." Nursing
progress notes on 3/14/02 document that resident #18 had an
incident with a nursing assistant at 8:45 pm, in which
he/she accused the staff of throwing water at him/her. A
review of the social services notes revealed there was no
counseling nor attempts at psychosocial intervention
provided to resident #18 after this incident. In fact,
15
there was no social work notes on resident #18 from 6/5/01
through 4/10/02 (ten months). A subsequent inquiry was made
to medical records to see if the resident's chart had been
thinned of social services notes. The surveyor was
informed by medical records staff that the "social services
notes were not thinned from the record." An interview with
the social worker revealed this employee had only worked at
the facility for approximately one week. Therefore, no
explanation could be offered why social services had rot
been intervening with resident #18's psychosocial needs
during this ten-month time span.
42. During the resident group meeting on 4-30-02,
three (3) residents reported that there have been so many
social service staff in the last several months that they
don't know who to talk to. The remaining eight (8)
residents agreed that this has been a problem.
43. Resident #26 asked to speak to the surveyor.
He/she complained that he/she cannot hear and that no one
is helping him/her. Additionally, the resident reported
that his/her eyeglasses do not fit right and that he/she
cannot wear them. As a result, the resident said, he/she
could not hear well nor see well. Review of the medical
record for resident #26 revealed that this resident had an
audiology appointment on 04-11-02 with no follow-up or
16
intervention. With regard to the eyeglasses, there has
been no intervention. This resident stated," he/she
believes he/she spoke with someone in the social service
department.
44. Resident # 15, who is oriented times three,
reported that he/she was abused. There was an in-house
investigation, which could not definitively substantiate
the abuse. However, the two alleged perpetrators were
removed from this resident's unit so as not to care for
him/her again. The resident reported that there has been
no intervention such as counseling or follow-up.
45. Resident #25, who is under 65 years of age, was
admitted in December of 2001 from a hospital following
surgery. During the resident group meeting, the resident
complained that he/she does not have any spending money.
The resident receives Medicaid and is entitled to $35.00
per month for spending money. During interview with the
social service designee, she admitted that she never
informed the resident that he/she was entitled to the
$35.00 per month. Further review revealed the resident, at
this time, does not meet the criteria for nursing hone
placement. According to the resident, who is oriented times
three, the social service designee told him/her that te
will have to leave the facility due to not meeting the
7
criteria for nursing home. He/she does not have a home and
does not have resources to help/her him live. The resident
further reported that Social Services has not helped
him/her find a place to live. He/she further reported that
he/she has not been able to sleep for the last two weeks
due to the worry that he/she will be homeless and "have to
live under a bridge somewhere." Review of the resident's
medical record revealed that there is no documentation that
Social Services has been intervening to help place this
resident in an appropriate setting. The correction date was
designated as May 31, 2002.
46. Based on the follow-up survey conducted on June
4, 2002, and based upon interviews and medical record
review, the facility did not provide medically-related
social services for 2 (residents # 10 and 12) of 12 sampled
residents. Findings include the following.
47. Interview with the family of Resident # 12
revealed that there were problems with a roommate
situation. Resident # 12 who is aphasic was extremely
upset because his roommate continually went though his
belongings. The roommate was moved but there was no follow
up with Resident #12. There were no notes indicating that
the roommate had been moved or that Resident #12 was even
having emotional issues. Interview with the administrator
18
revealed that she was aware of the situation and so was che
social service person who in fact arranged for the room
change. The wife of the resident and the administrator
reported that this resident was extremely upset. They both
reported that the resident was crying and the wife reported
that the resident was frustrated.
48. Resident #10 was interviewed and reported that he
doesn't know about his financial situation. He said that he
spoke with social service but nothing was resolved.
-nvestigation with the business office revealed that this
resident is “Medicaid pending”. After the resident was
informed of this by the surveyor, he reported that he
wished that he had known this before as he would have felt
much better.
49. Based on the foregoing facts, Integrated Health
Services of Florida at Lake Worth violated Section
400.022(1) (n), (2), Florida Statutes, Chapter 59A-4.1238
Florida Administrative Code and 483.25(h) (2), Code of
Federal Regulation herein classified as a Class III
deficiency which warrants an assessed fine of $2,000.00.
19
COUNT IV
INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA AT LAKE WORTH FAILED
TO PROVIDE PODIATRIC SERVICES TO A DIABETIC RESIDENT WHO
HAD REQUESTED THESE SERVICES.
TITLE 42 CHAPTER 483.25(h) (2), CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATION
59A-4.1288 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
59A-4.106(4) (u) FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
(QUALITY OF CARE)
50. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
Sl. Integrated Health Services of Florida at Lake
Worth participated in Title XVIII or Title XIX and
therefore must follow certification rules and regulations
found in Chapter 42 Code of Federal Regulation 482.
52. Based on survey conducted on May 1, 2002 and
based on direct observation, clinical record review, and
interview with facility staff on the c Wing, on 04/30/02,
it was determined the facility failed to ensure that
residents receive proper treatment and care for special
services in foot care, for one (#12) of 21 residents in the
sample selection. Findings include the following.
53. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on
04/14/02 with multiple wounds and cellulites to bilateral
extremities. On 04/30/02, during a dressing change
ooservation, the toenails on both feet were noted to he
long and thick, with a dark color substance under the
20
nails. The toenails, on the 3rd, 4th, and Sth toes of che
left foot, were noted to be reddish/ black in color.
Interview with the wound care nurse revealed that there
were "no orders for any type of treatment, and no
podiatrist has seen the resident since admission" ‘The
correction date was designated as May 31, 2002.
54, Based on the follow-up survey conducted on June
4, 2002 and based on interview, observation, and clinical
record review, it was determined that the facility did not
provide podiatry services to one resident in the survey
sample. Findings include the following.
55. A dressing change observation was conducted on
resident # 10 on June 04, 2002, during a revisit to an
annual survey. Observation of the resident's toenails
revealed them to be thick, yellow, and long, to the point
of curving inward. The resident is a diabetic and at risk
for developing infections. The resident is alert and
oriented, and able to communicate his/her needs. The nurse
doing the dressing change saw the toenails and stated
he/she needed them cut by a Podiatrist. The resident
expressed a desire to have them cut as well, and stated
he/she had been asking to see a Podiatrist. Review of the
resident's clinical record revealed no documentation that a
Podiatrist had been called. The resident was admitted into
21
the facility on January 10, 2002. The facility failed to
provide the services of a Podiatrist, pucting the resident
at risk of infection.
56. Based on the foregoing facts, Integrated Health
Services of Florida at Lake Worth violated Chapter 59A-
4,106(4) (u), Chapter 59A-4.1288 Florida Administrative Code
and 483.25 (h) (2), Code of Federal Regulation as
incorporated by Rule 59A-4.1288, Florida Administrative
Code, herein classified as a Class III deficiency which
warrants a fine of $2,000.00.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Agency requests the Court to order the
following relief:
1. Enter a judgment in favor of AHCA against
Integrated Health Services of Florida at Lake Worth on
Counts I, II, III and IV.
2. Assess against Integrated Health Services of
Florida at Lake Worth an administrative fine of $8,000.90
on Counts I, II, III and IV.
3. Assess costs related to the investigation and
prosecution of this matter, if applicable.
4, Grant such other relief as the court deems is
22
just and proper on Counts I, II, III and Iv.
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes (2002). Specific options for
administrative action are set out in the attached Election
of Rights and explained in the attached Explanation of
Rights. All requests for hearing shall be made to the
Agency for Health Care Administration, and delivered to the
Agency Clerk, Agency for Health Care Administration, 2727
Mahan Drive, MS #3, Tallahassee, Florida 32308.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO RECEIVE
A REQUEST FOR A HEARING WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF
THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL
ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
tad Ap Badges, ?
Assistant General Counsel
Agency for Health Care
Administration
8355 N. W. 53rd Street
Miami, Florida 33166
23
Copies furnished to:
Diane Reiland
Field Office Manager
Agency for Health Care
Administration
1710 East Tiffany Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33407
(U.S. Mail)
Jean Lombardi
Finance and Accounting
Agency for Health Care
Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
Skilled Nursing Facility Unit Program
Agency for Health Care
Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
24
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested to Barbara Yanez-Artiles, Administrator,
Integrated Health Services of Florida at Lake Worth, 1201
12 Avenue South, Lake Worth, Florida 33460; Arbor Living
Centers of Florida, Inc., 910 Ridgebreoke Road, Sparks
Glencoe, MD 21152; National Corporate Research Ltd. Inc.,
2406 Hays Street - Suite #2, Tallahassee, Florida 32301 on
this 3ed day of May, 2003.
toa,
Alba M. 2) 4a has git, 2
Docket for Case No: 03-002582