Petitioner: BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Respondent: CURTIS TAYLOR WILES
Judges: DARREN A. SCHWARTZ
Agency: County School Boards
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Nov. 20, 2018
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, January 9, 2019.
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2024
THE BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, FLORIDA
ROBERT W. RUNCIE,
Superintendent of Schools,
Petitioner,
v.
CURTIS TAYLOR WILES,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, Robert W. Runcie, Superintendent of Schools of
Broward County, Florida (“Petitioner”), through his undersigned
counsel, files this Administrative Complaint against Respondent,
CURTIS TAYLOR WILES (“WILES”). The Petitioner seeks termination
of Respondent’s employment with the Broward County School Board
(“BCSB”) pursuant to Chapter 120 and Sections 1001.51,
1012.27(5), and 1012.33 Florida Statutes and Rule 6A-5.056 of the
Florida Administrative Code. The Petitioner alleges the
following:
zr. JURISDICTIONAL BASIS
am The agency is the School Board of Broward County, Florida,
located at 600 Southeast Third Avenue, Fort Lauderdale,
Broward County, Florida 33301.
am The Petitioner is Robert W. Runcie, who is the
Superintendent of Schools of Broward County, Florida.
3. The Petitioner is statutorily obligated to recommend the
placement of school personnel and to require compliance and
observance with all laws, rules, and regulations.
Petitioner is authorized to report and enforce any violation
thereof, together with recommending the appropriate
disciplinary action against any instructional personnel
employed by the BCSB, inclusive of WILES.
it. MATERIAL ALLEGATIONS
The District hired WILES on or about July 1, 2008, as a
Mathematics Teacher who was employed at Everglades High
School (hereinafter “EVERGLADES”) .
WILES is an employee of the Broward County School Board and
is currently employed as a teacher pursuant to a
Professional Services Contract, issued in accordance with
Section 1012.33(3) (a), Florida Statutes (2017).
The last known address of WILES is 2770 Old Orchard Road,
Davie, Florida 33328.
This recommendation is based upon conduct occurring during
the 2017-2018 school year.
On or about January 29, 2018, another faculty member
reported to Principal Haleh Darbar, (hereinafter Darbar)
that a strong odor of alcohol was resonating from WILES as
he walked from the faculty parking lot into the building
prior to the start of school.
10.
11.
Lhe
13.
14.
Darbar directed Assistant Principal, Anthony Smith,
(hereinafter “Smith”) to investigate.
At approximately, 8:20 am, Smith observed through the glass
opening in the classroom door that WILES was reclined in his
chair, with both feet on his desk and was guises while
students were in 1st period class.
Smith used his key to enter the classroom and WILES slowly
opened his eyes and asked, “Mr. Smith what can I help you
with?” Smith indicated that he needed to check on a
student’s grades and attendance on his computer and
requested to see WILES’ grade book.
After three (3) unsuccessful attempts, WILES was unable to
log into his gradebook. A Reasonable Suspicion incident
Report was filed.
Smith observed that WILES was very lethargic, had slurred
speech, seemed confusion and disorientated, and had an odor
of alcohol. Smith also noticed that WILES’ eyes were glassy
and he appeared drowsy and was slow or had inappropriate
reactions.
Smith reported his observation to Darbar and Darbar directed
William Truesdale, Security Specialist (hereinafter
‘“Truesdale”), to escort Wiles to her office while a
substitute teacher covered Wiles’ remaining classes.
L5is
16.
17.
18.
19...
20.
At approximately 10:10am, a breathalyzer test was
administered and WILES tested positive for alcohol with a
initial reading of .344
Fifteen minutes later, another breathalyzer test was
administered and WILES blew a reading of .364. Both
readings are more than quadruple the .08 legal limit for
driving under the influence in the State of Florida.
Based on the results of the breathalyzer tests, a cab was
called to transport WILES home.
The following day on or about January 30, 2018, Smith spoke
telephonically with Mr. Wiles, Sr., WILES’ father, who
informed Smith that there was possibly a bottle of vodka in
WILES’ classroom closet.
Upon receiving WILES’ classroom keys from his father, Smith
and Carlos A. Menendez, (hereinafter “Menendez”) a behavior
specialist at the school, inspected WILES’ classroom cabinet
which contained a bottle of Smirnoff, Triple Distilled
Vodka(1.75 ounces) that was three quarters (%) empty.
(Exhibit “A”).
III. PREVIOUS DISCIPLINE
On or about October 13, 2012, WILES received a summary memo
regarding his classroom management and delivery of
instruction.
21.
22.
23.
24,
25%
On or about November 18, 2013, WILES received a summary memo
indicating the expectation that WILES be engaged in bell-to-
bell instruction.
Additionally, WILES, was also instructed to monitor his
students both during the instructional portion of his class
and while they completed their independent seatwork.
Iv. ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES
Petitioner realleges and incorporates herein by reference
the allegations set forth in paragraphs one (1) through
twenty-two (22) above.
Just cause exists for the requested relief pursuant to Fla.
Stat. § 1012.33(1) (a), Section 6A-5.056 F.A.C., the
Respondent’s employment contract, School Board rules and
regulations, the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession,
and the Employee Disciplinary Guidelines promulgated by the
School Board.
“Just cause” means cause that is legally sufficient. “Just
cause” includes, but is not limited to:
kkk
B. “Misconduct in Office” means one or more of the
following:
Le A violation of the Code of Ethics of the Education
Profession in Florida as adopted in Rule 6A-
10.080, F.A.C.1;
' Repealed 3-23-16.
yan A violation of the Principles of Professional
Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida as
adopted in Rule 6A-10.081, F.A.C.;
as A violation of the adopted school board rules;
4. Behavior that disrupts the student's learning
environment; or
a Behavior that reduces the teacher's ability or his
or his colleagues' ability to effectively perform
duties.
C. “Incompetency” means the inability, failure or lack of
fitness to discharge the required duty as a result of
inefficiency or incapacity.
1. “Inefficiency” means one or more of the following:
Qs Failure to perform duties prescribed by law;
b. Failure to communicate appropriately with and
relate to students;
c. Failure to communicate appropriately with and
relate to colleagues, administrators,
subordinates, or parents;
a. Disorganization of his or his classroom to
such an extent that the health, safety or
welfare of the students is diminished; or
es Excessive absences or tardiness.
2. “Incapacity” means one or more of the following:
a. Lack of emotional stability;
b. Lack of adequate physical ability;
Gx Lack of general educational background; or
da. Lack of adequate command of his or his area
of specialization.
* ke *
E. “Willful neglect of duty” means intentional or reckless
failure to carry out required duties.
xk kek *
26%
27.
28.
Vv. JUST CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
A. JUST CAUSE
Based on the aforementioned allegations, Respondent’s
actions constitute just cause to terminate his employment.
B. MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE
Respondent’s actions constitute misconduct in office.
The Respondent, through his above-described conduct, has
violated Fla. Stat. §1012.33 Fla. Stat., and
6A-5.056(2) (a) through (e) of the Florida Administrative
Code, which defines “misconduct”.
(2) “Misconduct in Office” means one or more of the
following:
(a) A violation of the Code of Ethics of the Education
Profession in Florida as adopted in Rule 6B-1.001,
F.A.C.;
(b) A violation of the Principles of Professional
Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida as
adopted in Rule 6B-1.006, F.A.C.;
(¢) A violation of the adopted school board rules;
(d) Behavior that disrupts the student’s learning
environment; or
(e) Behavior that reduces the teacher’s ability or his
or her colleagues’ ability to effectively perform
duties.
c. INCOMPETENCY
Respondent’s actions constitute incompetency. The
Respondent, through his above-described conduct has violated
25s
30.
31.
Fla. State. §1012.33 and Rule 6A-5.056(3) (a) and (b) of the
Florida Administrative Code. His actions show an inability,
failure or lack of fitness to discharge the required duty as
a result of inefficiency or incapacity.
(a) “Inefficiency” means one or more of the following:
1. Failure to perform duties prescribed by law;
2. Failure to communicate appropriately with and
relate to students;
3. Failure to communicate appropriately with and
relate to colleagues, administrators,
subordinates, or parents.
(b) “Incapacity” means one or more of the following:
1. Lack of adequate physical ability.
D. WILLFUL NEGLECT OF DUTY
Respondent’s actions constitute willful neglect of duty.
Willful neglect of duty means intentional or reckless
failure to carry out required duties.
Respondent failed to perform his duties as an educator by
being at work under the influence of alcohol.
Respondent further failed to perform his duties as an
educator by sleeping during instructional time while
students were present in the classroom.
32.
33%
34,
35.
36.
E. SCHOOL BOARD POLICY 2400
Respondent is in violation of School Board Policy 2400 (1),
which prohibits “possession or use of a _ controlled
substance, including alcohol, on all school board property
and at school sponsored activities” ?.
Furthermore, Respondent is in violation of School Board
Policy 2400 (3), which states that “each School Board
employee must refrain from the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled
substance, including alcohol, in the workplace”.
Employees are strictly prohibited from reporting to work or
being on duty while under the influence of alcohol or a
controlled substance or possessing alcohol at the work site.
School Board Policy 2400 requires that an employee who tests
positive shall be recommended for disciplinary action up to
and including termination of employment.
F. SCHOOL BOARD POLICY 4008
Respondent is in violation of School Board Policy 4008,
which requires all employees who have been issued contracts
to comply with the provisions of the Florida School Code,
State Board Regulations and regulations and policies of the
Board.
2 Emphasis added.
37. Furthermore, School Board Policy 4008(B) requires that
“members instructional staff shall perform the following
functions:”
dee Comply with the Code of Ethics and the Principles
of Professional Conduct of the Education
Profession in Florida.
B. Infuse in the classroom, the District’s adopted
Character Education Traits of Respect, Honesty,
Kindness, Self-control, Tolerance, Cooperation,
Responsibility and Citizenship.
8. Conform to all rules and regulations that may be
prescribed by the State Board and by the School
Board.
G. SCHOOL BOARD POLICY 4.9
38. “The District expects each employee, instructional and non-
instructional, to be in conformance, both in and out of the
work place, with all laws, whether federal, state or local,
State board rules, and all School Board policies, rules, and
regulations” (Policy 4.9 I(e)).
39. Respondent is also in violation of subsection II, which
prohibits the “unlawful possession, use or being under the
influence of a controlled substance and alcohol related
offenses” 3? (Policy 4.9 II (B) (c)(e)).
DEMAND FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, Petitioner, Robert W.
Runcie, Superintendent of Schools, recommends that the School
3 Emphasis added.
10
Board terminate the Respondent, Curtis Taylor Wiles, based upon
the foregoing facts and legal authority.
> |4*
EXECUTED this “—— day of August 2018.
ROBERT W. RUNCIE,
Superintendent of Schools,
Broward County
Respectfully submitted:
Tria Lawton-Russell, Esq.
Administrative Counsel
ll
NOTICE
If you wish to contest the charges, you must, within 15 days
calendar after receipt of the written notice, submit a written
request for a hearing to Robert W. Runcie, Superintendent,
Broward County School District, 600 374 Ave., Ft. Lauderdale, FL,
33301. If timely requested, such hearing shall be conducted by
an administrative law judge assigned by the Division of
Administrative Hearings of the Department of Management Services.
The hearing shall be conducted within 60 days after receipt of
the written appeal in accordance with chapter 120, Florida
Statutes.
FAILURE TO TIMELY REQUEST A HEARING WILL RESULT IN A WAIVER
OF THE RIGHT TO CONTEST THE CHARGES.
IF YOU WANT TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE
REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY IN THIS MATTER.
12
EXHIBIT
“ A
Docket for Case No: 18-006214TTS
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jan. 17, 2019 |
Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
|
Jan. 09, 2019 |
Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Dec. 21, 2018 |
Notice of Unavailability filed.
|
Dec. 21, 2018 |
Motion to Withdraw of Appeal as well as Withdrawal as Counsel F.B. #236810 filed.
|
Dec. 19, 2018 |
Order Granting Continuance and Rescheduling Hearing (hearing set for March 19 and 20, 2019; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Dec. 18, 2018 |
Joint Motion for Continuance filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2018 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Dec. 07, 2018 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 15 and 16, 2019; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Dec. 04, 2018 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Dec. 04, 2018 |
Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Dec. 04, 2018 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Nov. 28, 2018 |
Order Granting Extension of Time.
|
Nov. 28, 2018 |
Joint Motion for Extension of Time filed.
|
Nov. 28, 2018 |
Letter from C. Michael Cornely Regarding Initial Order filed.
|
Nov. 26, 2018 |
Notice of Service of Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories, First Request for Production, and First Request for Admissions filed.
|
Nov. 21, 2018 |
Initial Order.
|
Nov. 20, 2018 |
Notice of Appearance and Request for Hearing filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2018 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2018 |
Agency action letter filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2018 |
Agenda Request Form filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2018 |
Referral Letter filed.
|