Filed: Oct. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10016 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cr-08011-SPL-1 v. MEMORANDUM* ABDUL SABOOR, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 26, 2020** Before: McKEOWN, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. Abdul Saboor appeals fr
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10016 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cr-08011-SPL-1 v. MEMORANDUM* ABDUL SABOOR, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 26, 2020** Before: McKEOWN, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. Abdul Saboor appeals fro..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10016
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cr-08011-SPL-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ABDUL SABOOR,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 26, 2020**
Before: McKEOWN, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Abdul Saboor appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for conspiracy, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Saboor’s
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Saboor the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Saboor waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our
independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson,
582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
the appeal. See
id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2 20-10016