Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ORQUIZA v. WALLDESIGN, INC., 2:11-CV-1374 JCM (CWH). (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20141113f95 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN District Judge. Presently before the court is defendant D.R. Horton's motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' FLSA and N.R.S. 608.150 claims. (Doc. # 270). Plaintiffs did not file a response and the deadline to do so has passed. Also before the court is defendant D.R. Horton's separate motion for summary judgment regarding cross-claims against defendants Bello and Imperial Building Group. (Doc. # 273.) Defendant Michael Bello filed a response. (Doc. # 291). Defendant I
More

ORDER

JAMES C. MAHAN District Judge.

Presently before the court is defendant D.R. Horton's motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' FLSA and N.R.S. 608.150 claims. (Doc. # 270). Plaintiffs did not file a response and the deadline to do so has passed.

Also before the court is defendant D.R. Horton's separate motion for summary judgment regarding cross-claims against defendants Bello and Imperial Building Group. (Doc. # 273.) Defendant Michael Bello filed a response. (Doc. # 291). Defendant Imperial Building Group did not file a response and the deadline to do so has passed.

On October 3, 2014, defendant D.R. Horton and plaintiffs filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice as to all claims by plaintiffs against D.R. Horton. (Doc. # 304). The court granted this stipulation on the same day, (doc. # 305), thereby mooting defendant D.R. Horton's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's FLSA and N.R.S. 608.150 claims (doc. # 270).

On October 29, 2014, defendants D.R. Horton and Bello filed a stipulation dismissing with prejudice all cross-claims by D.R. Horton against defendants Bello and Imperial Building Group.1 The court granted this stipulation on November 10, 2014, (doc. # 309), thereby mooting defendant D.R. Horton's motion for summary judgment regarding cross-claims against defendants Bello and Imperial Building Group, (doc. # 273).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant and cross-complaintant D.R. Horton's motions for summary judgment (docs. ## 270 and 273) be, and the same hereby, are DENIED as moot. The motions are denied with prejudice.

FootNotes


1. Imperial Building Group is currently unrepresented by counsel in this matter.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer