Arrant v. Richardson, CV 17-393-JVS (AGR). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200123856
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plainti
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintif..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to hold defense counsel in contempt is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
