Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tucker v. Cowell, 1:18CV00035-JM-JTR. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20191008l95 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Tucker is allowed to proceed with his claim that Brenda Bridgeman provided inadequate medical care related to his prosthetic leg between September 2016 and Jul
More

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Tucker is allowed to proceed with his claim that Brenda Bridgeman provided inadequate medical care related to his prosthetic leg between September 2016 and July 6, 2017.

2. The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Bridgeman, Billy Cowell, Sheila Armstrong and Correct Care Solutions LLC (Document #40) is granted. All other claims against Bridgeman are dismissed without prejudice. All claims against Cowell, Armstrong and Correct Care Solutions LLC are dismissed without prejudice.

3. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Dr. Leland Felix (Document #58) is granted, and all claims against him are dismissed without prejudice.

4. Tucker's ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims are dismissed without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer