Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Shirhashirim v. Gibson, 5:19-cv-11-DPM-JJV. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190703a36 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . 1. On de novo review, the Court partly adopts and partly declines without prejudice the recommendation, No. 26. FED. R. CIV. P.72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The Court adopts the recommendation as to any due process claim against Defendant Gibson. As to the claim against Defendant Washington, though, the Court would appreciate further development. In a belated response to the motion for summary judgment, Shirhashirim argues
More

ORDER

1. On de novo review, the Court partly adopts and partly declines without prejudice the recommendation, No. 26. FED. R. CIV. P.72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The Court adopts the recommendation as to any due process claim against Defendant Gibson. As to the claim against Defendant Washington, though, the Court would appreciate further development. In a belated response to the motion for summary judgment, Shirhashirim argues that he submitted a timely appeal on grievance VSM18-2682 but that the ADC truck mail did not deliver it promptly. No. 27; cf. Lewis v. Carswell, No. 69 & No. 84 in E.D. Ark. No. 5:15-cv-254-DPM. In light of this new wrinkle, the Court returns that piece of the case to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings and a new recommendation in due course.

2. Motion for status update, No. 28, denied as moot.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer