Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., 09-cv-05235-MMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150226808 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2015
Summary: JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING DAMAGES RETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN VIEW OF FEB. 18, 2015 SCHEDULING TELECONFERENCE MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Following the Court's scheduling determinations and directions during the status conference held on February 18, 2015, Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. ("Power Integrations") and Defendants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation (collect
More

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING DAMAGES RETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN VIEW OF FEB. 18, 2015 SCHEDULING TELECONFERENCE

Following the Court's scheduling determinations and directions during the status conference held on February 18, 2015, Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. ("Power Integrations") and Defendants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation (collectively, "Fairchild") met and conferred and jointly submit the following schedule for the proceedings related to the forthcoming new trial on damages:

Event/Deadline Date Produce updated sales data through the end of 2014 March 4 ID fact witnesses to be called live at trial March 11 Complete fact witness discovery April 30 Disclose identity of experts and general subject(s) of their testimony April 30 Opening Expert Reports (incl. damages, technical, and any survey June 11 experts) Rebuttal Expert Reports July 7 Close of Expert Discovery July 15 Produce updated sales data through end of June 2015, to permit the July 31 parties to incorporate up-to-date figures in their presentations at trial Daubert Briefing Aug. 28 Sept. 11 Sept. 18 Daubert Hearing Oct. 2 Pretrial Order/MILs (per J. Chesney's standing order) Nov. 2 Pretrial hearing Nov. 17 Trial Dec. 7-11

The parties have also agreed that fact depositions will be capped at 2.5 hours for witnesses who have already been deposed, with regular (i.e., 7 hour) depositions for any newly-disclosed fact witnesses who have not been deposed to date. The parties also agree that the deposition of one Fairchild fact witness from Taiwan may be taken after the close of fact witness discovery to permit the deposition to be taken in the United States.

Fairchild reserves the right to serve a limited number of contention interrogatories after the close of fact discovery should fact witness discovery not fully delineate the basis for Power Integrations' new damages theories. Power Integrations reserves its objections to the service and substance of any such discovery.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Defendants.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer