Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

District Court, N.D. California

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
BROWN v. STROUD, CV 08-02348 JSW (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 15, 2015 Citations: CV 08-02348 JSW, CV 13-01079 JSW

STIPULATED INJUNCTION AND ORDER THEREON JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . Plaintiff Steven Ames Brown ("Brown"), Plaintiff the Estate of Nina Simone, and Third-Party Defendant Orchard Enterprises NY, Inc. ("Orchard"), by and through their attorneys, stipulate that the Court may enter the following stipulated injunction in the above captioned matter: 1. For a period of ten years after December 11, 2015, Orchard agrees that Orchard, any subsidiary of Orchard, and/or any person, firm or...

# 1
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. PG & H COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 3:15-cv-00739-EMC. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 04, 2015 Citations: 3:15-cv-00739-EMC.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiffs Pacific Bell Telephone Company, BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc. (collectively referred to as the "AT&T ILECs") and Defendant PG & H Communications, Inc. ("PG & H") submit their...

# 2
ASTURIAS v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 3:15-cv-03861-RS. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 04, 2015 Citations: 3:15-cv-03861-RS.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [Removed from Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Francisco Case No. CGC-15-546996] RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . The Court, having received and reviewed the stipulation of plaintiffs Elena Asturias and Carlota Del Portillo and defendants Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Veriprise Processing Solutions LLC ("Defendants") to extend Defendants' time to respond to the...

# 3
CAREY v. CARGILL, INC., 3:15-cv-00922-WHO. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 04, 2015 Citations: 3:15-cv-00922-WHO.

PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND RELATED STIPULATION PER FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . STIPULATION TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: Plaintiff RITA CAREY, by and through her attorneys of record, hereby requests this Court to dismiss this action with prejudice. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Defendants CARGILL, INC. and CARGILL, INC. dba CARGILL SALT ("Defendants") by and through their attorneys of record, represent Defendants' non-...

# 4
SALISBURY v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, 3:12-cv-03260-CRB. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 22, 2015 Citations: 3:12-cv-03260-CRB.

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED f/k/a NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, INC. CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. All claims against Defendant HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED f/k/a NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, INC. are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

# 5
HARO v. THERM-X OF CALIFORNIA, INC., 15-cv-02123-JCS. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 29, 2015 Citations: 15-cv-02123-JCS.

STIPULATION TO DISMISS JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii). LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS By: Richard M. Rogers Attorneys for Plaintiff RAUL HARO Dated: November 16, 2013 FERBER LAW, A Professional Corporation By: Michelle R. Ferber Jonathan R. Babione...

# 6
GARDNER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, 3:14-cv-01082-TEH. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 15, 2015 Citations: 3:14-cv-01082-TEH.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL THELTON E. HENDERSON , District Judge . The current date for the hearing on the Motion for a New trial is February 22, 2016. (Document #113.) Due to the unavailability of counsel for the Defendant on that date, the parties agree to continue the hearing date in this matter. STIPULATION The parties hereby respectfully request that this Court continue the hearing date on the Motion for a New Trial in this...

# 7
M/A-COM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC. v. INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR SERVICE, INC., 3:15-cv-02423-EMC (KAW). (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 15, 2015 Citations: 3:15-cv-02423-EMC (KAW).

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Since the last Case Management Statement filed on November 18, 2015, plaintiff M/A Technology Solutions Inc. ("MACOM") and defendant Steven Collins ("Collins") have entered into a written settlement agreement, which includes a stipulation for entry of judgment if certain payments are not made. The agreement also provides that Judge Westmore will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and enter a stipulated...

# 8
FELIX v. ANDERSON, 3:14-cv-03809-HSG. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 28, 2015 Citations: 3:14-cv-03809-HSG.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Court Judge . Defendant Karin L. Anderson ("Defendant") and Plaintiffs Scott Emerson Felix and Patricia Lovehal Shuey (the "Plaintiffs") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby submit this proposed protective order, which, with two exceptions, is identical to that of the United States District Court Northern District of California's Stipulated Protective Order for Standard Litigation. First, this proposed...

# 9
MUSGRAVE v. ICC/MARIE CALLENDER'S GOURMET PRODUCTS DIVISION, 3:14-cv-02006-HSG. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 28, 2015 Citations: 3:14-cv-02006-HSG.

JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSAL OF CLASS CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM , District Judge . I. INTRODUCTION The parties, plaintiff Edward Musgrave ("Plaintiff") and defendant ICC/Marie Callender's Gourmet Products Division ("Defendant"), hereby jointly request dismissal of Plaintiff's individual claims with prejudice and dismissal of the putative class claims without prejudice. Plaintiff has settled and...

# 10
RUBINO v. HARRIS, C 14-05553 EJD (PR). (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 07, 2015 Citations: C 14-05553 EJD (PR).

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR REMAINING DEFENDANT; ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS (Docket Nos. 38, 69 & 75) EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . Robert Rubino, a state prisoner at R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego County, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On June 2, 2015, the Court screened Plaintiff's first amended complaint ("FAC") and ordered service on the United States, United States...

# 11
U.S. v. AGUAYO-SOLORZANO, 15cr2581-AJB. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 11, 2015 Citations: 15cr2581-AJB.

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL BARBARA L. MAJOR , Magistrate Judge . IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that: _____ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or _____ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or _____ the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or _____...

# 12
MARENTES v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 15-cv-05616-RS. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 14, 2015 Citations: 15-cv-05616-RS.

REFERRAL FOR RELATED CASE DETERMINATION RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), this action is hereby referred to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh for a determination as to whether it should be deemed related to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Marentes, 15-cv-02289-LHK. IT IS SO ORDERED.

# 13
MARENTES v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 15-cv-05616-RS. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 14, 2015 Citations: 15-cv-05616-RS.

REFERRAL FOR RELATED CASE DETERMINATION RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), this action is hereby referred to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh for a determination as to whether it should be deemed related to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Marentes, 15-cv-02289-LHK. IT IS SO ORDERED.

# 14
ELLISON v. AUTOZONE INC., C13-01149 CRB. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 14, 2015 Citations: C13-01149 CRB.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . On November 16, 2015, this Court ordered Plaintiff Lynetta Ellison to show cause by December 11, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., why her case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See OSC (dkt. 69). Plaintiff did not respond to the Court's order, nor did she appear at the show cause hearing held on December 11, 2015. See Minutes (dkt. 70). Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is...

# 15
JPMORGAN BANK, N.A. v. RENFRO, 5:15-cv-05744-PSG. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 29, 2015 Citations: 5:15-cv-05744-PSG.

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE TO A DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REMANDING SUA SPONTE AND DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Re: Docket Nos. 2, 4, 5) PAUL S. GREWAL , Magistrate Judge . This is the third time that Defendants David Renfro et al. have removed this unlawful detainer action to federal court. 1 The court ORDERS the Clerk of Court to reassign this case to a district judge and RECOMMENDS that the newly assigned judge REMAND the case for lack of subject matter...

# 16
LUXURYCATALOGS.COM, INC. v. MILLER, 14-cv-04952-TEH (MEJ). (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 28, 2015 Citations: 14-cv-04952-TEH (MEJ).

REPORT & RECOMMENDATION RE: MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 60 MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . On November 7, 2014, Plaintiff Luxurycatalogs.com, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed a Complaint seeking to recover damages it incurred after Defendant Daniel G. Miller ("Defendant") allegedly sold it certain rare books he had purportedly stolen. Compl. 1, Dkt. No. 1. On November 2, 2015, the parties and their respective counsel appeared before the undersigned for a...

# 17
TAPP v. SKYWEST, INC., 3:15-cv-05146-MMC. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 09, 2015 Citations: 3:15-cv-05146-MMC.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1404(A) AND THE "FIRST TO FILE" RULE MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On November 27, 2015, Defendants Sky West, Inc. and Sky West Airlines, Inc. ("Defendants") filed a Motion to Transfer Venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1404(a) and the "first to file" rule. Plaintiffs Cheryl Tapp, Renee Sitavich, Sarah Hudson, Brandon Colson, and Bruno Lozano ("Plaintiffs") do not oppose transfer...

# 18
U.S. v. BOWIE, CR 15-00564-VC. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 10, 2015 Citations: CR 15-00564-VC.

AMENDED STIPULATED ORDER EXCLUDINGTIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . This Amended Stipulated Order Excluding Time Under the Speedy Trial Act is entered to correct an error with respect to the dates on the previously entered Stipulated Order Extending Time Under the Speedy Trial Act (ECF No. 15, Dec. 2, 2015). For the reasons stated by the parties on the record on December 2, 2015 , the Court excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act from December 2, 2015...

# 19
U.S. v. LUU, CR 15-529 CRB. (2015)
District Court, N.D. California Filed:CA Dec. 10, 2015 Citations: CR 15-529 CRB.

STIPULATED ORDER EXCLUDINGTIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons stated by the parties on the record on Dec. 10 , 2015, the Court excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act from Dec. 10 , 2015 to Dec. 23 , 2015 and finds that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A). The Court makes this finding and bases this continuance on the...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer