U.S. v. BOWIE, CR 15-00564-VC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160113d84
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2015
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATED ORDER EXCLUDINGTIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . This Amended Stipulated Order Excluding Time Under the Speedy Trial Act is entered to correct an error with respect to the dates on the previously entered Stipulated Order Extending Time Under the Speedy Trial Act (ECF No. 15, Dec. 2, 2015). For the reasons stated by the parties on the record on December 2, 2015 , the Court excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act from December 2, 2015 t
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATED ORDER EXCLUDINGTIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . This Amended Stipulated Order Excluding Time Under the Speedy Trial Act is entered to correct an error with respect to the dates on the previously entered Stipulated Order Extending Time Under the Speedy Trial Act (ECF No. 15, Dec. 2, 2015). For the reasons stated by the parties on the record on December 2, 2015 , the Court excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act from December 2, 2015 to..
More
AMENDED STIPULATED ORDER EXCLUDINGTIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
LAUREL BEELER, Magistrate Judge.
This Amended Stipulated Order Excluding Time Under the Speedy Trial Act is entered to correct an error with respect to the dates on the previously entered Stipulated Order Extending Time Under the Speedy Trial Act (ECF No. 15, Dec. 2, 2015).
For the reasons stated by the parties on the record on December 2, 2015, the Court excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act from December 2, 2015 to December 10, 2015 and finds that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The Court makes this finding and bases this continuance on the following factor(s):
X Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
Further, defendant waives the time limits prescribed in Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1 for preliminary hearing, which is set for December 10, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. and the Court extends that deadline for good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
