M/A-COM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC. v. INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR SERVICE, INC., 3:15-cv-02423-EMC (KAW). (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160121d47
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2015
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Since the last Case Management Statement filed on November 18, 2015, plaintiff M/A Technology Solutions Inc. ("MACOM") and defendant Steven Collins ("Collins") have entered into a written settlement agreement, which includes a stipulation for entry of judgment if certain payments are not made. The agreement also provides that Judge Westmore will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and enter a stipulated ju
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Since the last Case Management Statement filed on November 18, 2015, plaintiff M/A Technology Solutions Inc. ("MACOM") and defendant Steven Collins ("Collins") have entered into a written settlement agreement, which includes a stipulation for entry of judgment if certain payments are not made. The agreement also provides that Judge Westmore will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and enter a stipulated jud..
More
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Since the last Case Management Statement filed on November 18, 2015, plaintiff M/A Technology Solutions Inc. ("MACOM") and defendant Steven Collins ("Collins") have entered into a written settlement agreement, which includes a stipulation for entry of judgment if certain payments are not made. The agreement also provides that Judge Westmore will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and enter a stipulated judgment, if necessary. The last payment under this settlement agreement is to be made on December 31, 2016.
Because co-defendant Integrated Semiconductor Service Inc. ("ISS") is a suspended corporation, is not represented, is not a party to the settlement agreement and has not responded to the complaint, MACOM will be filing a request to take its default. However, if Collins makes all the payments under the settlement agreement there will be no reason to have a judgment entered against ISS.
Accordingly, the parties request that the Court keep jurisdiction over this matter until either judgment is entered against both ISS and Collins because Collins fails to make a payment under the settlement agreement, or the parties dismiss the action after the last payment is made on or before December 31, 2016. In light of this, MACOM and Collins respectfully request that the Court vacate the December 17, 2015 status conference.
Source: Leagle
